Competitive interactions in somatosensory cortex for concurrent vibrotactile stimulation between and within hands

Biological Psychology - Tập 110 - Trang 91-99 - 2015
Cheuk Yee Pang1, Matthias M. Mueller1
1Institute of Psychology, University of Leipzig, 04109 Leipzig, Germany

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adler, 2009, Shift of attention to the body location of distracters is mediated by perceptual load in sustained somatosensory attention, Biological Psychology, 81, 77, 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.02.001 Alvarez, 2005, Independent resources for attentional tracking in the left and right visual hemifields, Psychological Science, 16, 637, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01587.x Alvarez, 2012, Anatomical constraints on attention: Hemifield independence is a signature of multifocal spatial selection, Journal of Vision, 12, 9, 10.1167/12.5.9 Appelbaum, 2008, Figure–ground interaction in the human visual cortex, Journal of Vision, 8, 8, 10.1167/8.9.8 Beck, 2009, Top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in biasing competition in the human brain, Vision Research, 49, 1154, 10.1016/j.visres.2008.07.012 Biermann, 1998, Interaction of finger representation in the human first somatosensory cortex: A neuromagnetic study, Neuroscience Letters, 251, 13, 10.1016/S0304-3940(98)00480-7 Boynton, 2009, A framework for describing the effects of attention on visual responses, Vision Research, 49, 1129, 10.1016/j.visres.2008.11.001 Breitwieser, 2012, Stability and distribution of steady-state somatosensory evoked potentials elicited by vibro-tactile stimulation, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 50, 347, 10.1007/s11517-012-0877-9 Breitwieser, 2011, 6373 Delorme, 2004, EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis, Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9, 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 Desimone, 1998, Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B – Biological Sciences, 353, 1245, 10.1098/rstb.1998.0280 Desimone, 1995, Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention, Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193, 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 Franconeri, 2013, Flexible cognitive resources: Competitive content maps for attention and memory, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 134, 10.1016/j.tics.2013.01.010 Friedman, 1981, Hemispheres as independent resource system: Limited-capacity processing and cerebral specialization, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1031 Fuchs, 2008, Attentional bias of competitive interactions in neuronal networks of early visual processing in the human brain, NeuroImage, 41, 1086, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.040 Gandevia, 1983, Convergence in the somatosensory pathway between cutaneous afferents from the index and middle fingers in man, Experimental Brain Research, 50, 415 Giabbiconi, 2004, Selective spatial attention to left or right hand flutter sensation modulates the steady-state somatosensory evoked potential, Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 58, 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.01.004 Giabbiconi, 2007, Sustained spatial attention to vibration is mediated in primary somatosensory cortex, NeuroImage, 35, 255, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.022 Goltz, 2013, Sustained spatial attention to vibrotactile stimulation in the flutter range: Relevant brain regions and their interaction, PLoS ONE, 8, e84196, 10.1371/journal.pone.0084196 Gundlach, 2013, Perception of illusory contours forms intermodulation responses of steady state visual evoked potentials as a neural signature of spatial integration, Biological Psychology, 94, 55, 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.04.014 Hillyard, 1998, Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 781, 10.1073/pnas.95.3.781 Hillyard, 1998, Sensory gain control (amplication) as a mechanism of selective attention: Electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B – Biological Sciences, 353, 1257, 10.1098/rstb.1998.0281 Hoechstetter, 2001, Interaction of tactile input in the human primary and secondary somatosensory cortex – A magnetoencephalographic study, NeuroImage, 14, 759, 10.1006/nimg.2001.0855 Hou, 2003, Development of the spatial organization and dynamics of lateral interactions in the human visual system, Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 8630, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-25-08630.2003 Hsieh, 1995, The interaction of the somatosensory evoked potentials to simultaneous finger stimuli in the human central nervous system. A study using direct recordings, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 96, 135, 10.1016/0168-5597(94)00251-9 Ishibashi, 2000, Differential interaction of somatosensory inputs in the human primary sensory cortex: A magnetoencephalographic study, Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 1095, 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00266-2 Junghöfer, 2000, Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies, Psychophysiology, 37, 523, 10.1111/1469-8986.3740523 Keitel, 2013, Independent effects of attentional gain control and competitive interactions on visual stimulus processing, Cerebral Cortex, 23, 940, 10.1093/cercor/bhs084 Kelly, 1999, EEG evidence of stimulus-directed response dynamics in human somatosensory cortex, Brain Research, 815, 326, 10.1016/S0006-8993(98)01087-7 Kelly, 1997, Periodic microstimulation of single mechanoreceptive afferents produces frequency-following responses in human EEG, Journal of Neurophysiology, 77, 137, 10.1152/jn.1997.77.1.137 Luck, 1997, Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex, Journal of Neurophysiology, 77, 24, 10.1152/jn.1997.77.1.24 Nangini, 2006, Magnetoencephalographic study of vibrotactile evoked transient and steady-state responses in human somatosensory cortex, NeuroImage, 33, 252, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.045 Pang, 2014, Test–retest reliability of concurrently recorded steady-state and somatosensory evoked potentials in somatosensory sustained spatial attention, Biological Psychology, 100, 86, 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.05.009 Reardon, 2009, Bilateral attentional advantage on elementary visual tasks, Vision Research, 49, 691, 10.1016/j.visres.2009.01.005 Regan, 1989 Regan, 1987, Nonlinearity in human visual responses to two-dimensional patterns, and a limitation of Fourier methods, Vision Research, 27, 2181, 10.1016/0042-6989(87)90132-5 Reynolds, 2004, Attentional modulation of visual processing, Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 611, 10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131039 Reynolds, 1999, Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4, Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 1736, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-05-01736.1999 Reynolds, 2009, The normalization model of attention, Neuron, 61, 168, 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.002 Sereno, 1991, Discrimination within and between hemifields: A new constraint on theories of attention, Neuropsychologia, 29, 659, 10.1016/0028-3932(91)90100-M Severens, 2010, Transient and steady-state responses to mechanical stimulation of different fingers reveal interactions based on lateral inhibition, Clinical Neurophysiology, 121, 2090, 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.05.016 Snyder, 1992, Steady-state vibration evoked potentials: Description of technique and characterization of responses, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 84, 257, 10.1016/0168-5597(92)90007-X Soto-Faraco, 2004, Tactile selective attention and body posture: Assessing the multisensory contributions of vision and proprioception, Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1077, 10.3758/BF03196837 Stormer, 2014, Within-Hemifield competition in early visual areas limits the ability to track multiple objects with attention, Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 11526, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0980-14.2014 Tanosaki, 2002, Neural mechanisms for generation of tactile interference effects on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields in humans, Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 672, 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00052-4 Tobimatsu, 1999, Steady-state vibration somatosensory evoked potentials: Physiological characteristics and tuning function, Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 1953, 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00146-7 Walter, 2014, Competitive interactions of attentional resources in early visual cortex during sustained visuospatial attention within or between visual hemifields: Evidence for the different-hemifield advantage, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 938, 10.1162/jocn_a_00547 Witelson, 1974, Hemispheric specialization for linguistic and nonlinguistic tactual perception using a dichotomous stimulation technique, Cortex, 10, 3, 10.1016/S0010-9452(74)80034-1 Witelson, 1976, Sex and the single hemisphere: Specialization of the right hemisphere for spatial processing, Science, 193, 425, 10.1126/science.935879 Womelsdorf, 2008, Receptive field shift and shrinkage in macaque middle temporal area through attentional gain modulation, Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 8934, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4030-07.2008 Zemon, 1982, Visual evoked potentials: Evidence for lateral interactions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 79, 5723, 10.1073/pnas.79.18.5723 Zemon, 1984, Intermodulation components of the visual evoked potential: Responses to lateral and superimposed stimuli, Biological Cybernetics, 50, 401, 10.1007/BF00335197