Compensation and Overcoming of Historical Injustice
Res Publica - Trang 1-18 - 2024
Tóm tắt
On the basis of Waldron’s supersession thesis, this article discusses the historical injustice argument and contends that in order to evaluate moral claims for restitution of territorial titles it is important to consider the legitimate expectations of citizens that have been formed historically and have been sanctioned by the state through institutional mechanisms of stabilization of expectations. The legitimate expectations of citizens form normative demands that cannot be disregarded when rectifying historical injustices. In his arguments in favour of the supersession thesis, Waldron does not give sufficient attention to the concept of ‘legitimate expectation’, even though the thesis is reinforced by this reference. Unlike exclusively restitutive and rectificatory measures, this paper relies on present considerations of the consequences of past injustices, all within the framework of a theory of justice. In this sense, compensation deals with the past, but in a forward-looking way.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Allen, Buchanan. 1991. Secession: The morality of political divorce from Fort Sumter to Lithuania and Quebec. Colorado: Westview Press.
Barry, Brian. 2001. Culture and equality. Cambridge: Policy Press.
Bauer, Otto. 1907. Die Nationalitätenfrage und die Sozialdemokratie. Wien: Verlag.
Sánchez Botero, Esther. 2009. La realización del pluralismo jurídico de tipo igualitario en Colombia. Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas UNAM. https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/na/v22n71/v22n71a3.pdf. Accessed July 2023.
Braude, Benjamin, and Bernard Lewis. 1982. Christian and Jews in the Ottoman Empire: The functioning of a plural society. New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers.
Buchanan, Allen. 1975. Distributive justice and legitimate expectations. Philosophical Studies 28: 419–425.
Butt, Daniel. 2013. Inhering rights to reparation: Compensatory justice and the passage of time. Ethical Perspectives 20 (2): 245–269.
Calabresi, Guido. 1990. Ideale, Überzeugungen, Einstellungen und ihr Verhältnis zum Recht. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
de Vitoria, Francisco. 2021. Doctrina sobre los Indios (De indis). Chile: San Esteban Editorial, Colección Core Curriculum, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking rights seriously. US: Harvard University Press.
Feldman, Fred. 2010. Pleasure and the good life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Furnivall, John Sydenham. 1948. Colonial policy and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Galanter, Marc, and Jayanth Krishnan. 2001. Personal law systems and religious conflict: A comparison of India and Israel. In Religion and personal law in secular India, ed. Gerald James Larson. Delhi: Social Science Press.
Ivison, Duncan. 2006. Historical injustice. In The Oxford handbook of political theory, ed. John S. Dryzek, Bonnie Honig, and Anne Phillips. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ivison, Duncan. 2020. Can liberal states accommodate indigenous peoples? Cambridge: Policy Press.
Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Locke, John. 2000. The second treatise of government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Loewe, Daniel. 2022. Fronteras, propiedad, e intrusión: Libertarios e inmigración. Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofía 87: 171–186.
Loewe, Daniel. 2023. Multiculturalismo, identidad, plurinacionalidad y todas esas cosas. Santiago: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Loewe. Daniel. 2005. Konsoziationaler Föderalismus und die Identitätspolitik. In Globale Gerechtigkeit, ed. Jean-Christophe Merle, Fromman-Holzboog.
Lu, Catherine. 2017. Justice and reconciliation in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lukas, Meyer, and Sanklecha Pranay. 2014. How legitimate expectations matters in climate justice. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 13 (4): 369–393.
Lyon, David. 1977. New Indian claims and rights to land. Social Theory and Practice 4 (3): 249–272.
Marx, Karl. 1968. Das Kapital. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.
Mascareño, Aldo. 2022. Abandonar la modernidad: Discurso y praxis decolonial en la Convención Constitucional Chilena. Puntos de Referencia. Centro de Estudios Públicos. https://c22cepchile.cl/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/PDF-597.pdf.
Meyer, Lukas, and Santiago Truccone-Borgogno. 2022. Legitimate expectation: Assessing policies of transformation to a low-carbon society. Environmental Values 31 (6): 701–720.
Meyer, Lukas, and Timothy Waligore. 2022. Superseding historical injustice? New Critical Assessment, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 25 (3): 319–330.
Moore, Margaret. 2017. Legitimate expectations and land. Moral Philosophy and Politics 4 (2): 229–255.
Nine, Cara. 2008. Superseding historical injustice and territorial rights. Critical Review of International and Political Philosophy 11 (1): 79–87.
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, state, and utopia. US: Basic Books.
Okin, Susan. 1999. Is multiculturalism bad for Women? In Is multiculturalism bad for women? Susan Moller Okin with respondents, ed. Joshua Cohen, Matthew Howard, and Martha Nussbaum. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, John. 1993. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Raz, Joseph. 1986. The morality of freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schwember, Felipe, and Daniel Loewe. 2021. No empeorar la situación de los otros: La estipulación de Locke y las apropiaciones originarias en la teoría del título válido de Nozick. Eidos 35: 374–403.
Sharp, Andrew. 1997. Justice and the Maori. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sher, George. 1981. Ancient wrongs and modern rights. Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (1): 3–17.
Simpson, Audra. 2014. Mohawks interruptus. Political life across the borders of settler states. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Smith, Michael Garfield. 1965. The plural society in the British West Indies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Spinner-Halev, Jeff. 2012. Enduring injustice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steiner, Hillel. 1992. Libertarianism and the transnational migration of people. In Free movement, ed. Brian Barry and Robert Goodin, 87–94. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Truccone, Santiago. 2022. The supersession thesis, climate change, and the rights of future people. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 25 (3): 364–378.
Waldron, Jeremy. 1992. Superseding historic injustice. Ethics 103 (1): 4–28.
Waldron, Jeremy. 2002. Redressing historic injustice. University of Toronto Law Journal 52 (1): 135–160.
Waldron, Jeremy. 2004. Settlement, return, and the supersession thesis. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 5 (2): 237–268.
Waldron, Jeremy. 2022. Supersession: A reply. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 25 (3): 443–458.
Waldron, Jeremy. 2013. Supersession and sovereignty. New York University School of Law, Public Law & Legal Theory Research, Paper Series, Working Paper No. 13–33.
Waligore, Timothy. 2017. Legitimate expectations, historical injustice, and perverse incentives for settlers. Moral Philosophy and Politics 4 (2): 207–228.
Weber, Eugene. 1976. Peasants into Frenchman. The modernization of rural France, 1870–1914. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Wenar, Leif. 2006. Reparations for the future. Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (2): 396–404.
Ypi, Lea. 2013. What’s wrong with colonialism. Philosophy and Public Affairs 41 (2): 158–191.