Comparison of the Micronucleus and Chromosome Aberration Techniques for the Documentationof Cytogenetic Damage in Radiochemotherapy-Treated Patients with Rectal Cancer

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 187 - Trang 52-58 - 2010
Hendrik Andreas Wolff*1, Steffen Hennies1, Markus Karl Alfred Herrmann1, Margret Rave-Fränk1, David Eickelmann1, Patricia Virsik2, Klaus Jung3, Markus Schirmer4, Michael Ghadimi5, Clemens Friedrich Hess1, Robert Michael Hermann1,6, Hans Christiansen1,7
1Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Medicine Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
2Department of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, University Medicine Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
3Department of Medical Statistics, University Medicine Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
4Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medicine Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
5Department of Surgery, University Medicine Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
6Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, Ärztehaus an der Ammerlandklinik, Westerstede, Germany
7Department of Radiotherapy and Radiooncology, University Medicine Goettingen, Göttingen, Germany

Tóm tắt

The goal of the interdisciplinary Clinical Research Unit KFO179 (Biological Basis of Individual Tumor Response in Patients with Rectal Cancer) is to develop an individual Response and Toxicity Score for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. The aim of the present study was to find a reliable and sensitive method with easy scoring criteria and high numbers of cell counts in a short period of time in order to analyze DNA damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes. Thus, the cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) assay and the chromosome aberration technique (CAT) were tested. Peripheral blood lymphocytes obtained from 22 patients with rectal cancer before (0 Gy), during (21.6 Gy), and after (50.4 Gy) radiochemotherapy were stimulated in vitro by phytohemagglutinin (PHA); the cultures were then processed for the CBMN assay and the CAT to compare the two methods. A significant increase of chromosomal damage was observed in the course of radiochemotherapy parallel to increasing radiation doses, but independent of the chemotherapy applied. The equivalence of both methods was shown by Westlake’s equivalence test. The results show that the CBMN assay and the CAT are equivalent. For further investigations, we prefer the CBMN assay, because it is simpler through easy scoring criteria, allows high numbers of cell counts in less time, is reliable, sensitive, and has higher statistical power. In the future, we plan to integrate cytogenetic damage during radiochemotherapy into the planned Response and Toxicity Score within our interdisciplinary Clinical Research Unit.

Tài liệu tham khảo