Comparison of the FLOTAC technique with the McMaster method and the Baermann technique to determine counts of Dictyocaulus eckerti L1 and strongylid eggs in faeces of red deer (Cervus elaphus)

Parasitology Research - Tập 107 - Trang 555-560 - 2010
Benjamin U. Bauer1, William E. Pomroy1, Julien Gueydon1, Samuel Gannac1, Ian Scott1, Kurt Pfister2
1Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
2Institute of Comparative Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, Ludwig-Maximillians-University, Munich, Germany

Tóm tắt

The FLOTAC flotation technique has been introduced as a new diagnostic tool to detect parasitic elements from faeces. Samples from naturally infected young deer were used for counting Dictyocaulus larvae and strongylid eggs. The FLOTAC technique, using 11 different flotation solutions with specific gravities (sg) between 1.20 and 1.45, was compared with the Baermann technique and the saturated sodium chloride (sg 1.20)-based McMaster method. In addition, a comparison was made between the FLOTAC technique with magnesium sulphate (sg 1.28) and the Baermann technique for larval recovery from faeces that were examined on the day of collection or after 7 days storage at 4°C. On the whole egg counts between the FLOTAC using different flotation solutions and the McMaster were unremarkable. In contrast, variations of larval counts were detected between different flotation solutions as well as with the Baermann technique. Most flotation solutions with a specific gravity of 1.20 floated significantly fewer lungworm larvae (p < 0.05) compared to flotation solutions with a higher specific gravity. Magnesium sulphate (sg 1.28) consistently produced the highest mean larval counts in all conducted experiments. Larval counts using magnesium sulphate (sg 1.28) were higher than with the Baermann technique both on the day of collection and after 7 days. Overall, the use of magnesium sulphate (sg 1.28) with FLOTAC for larval counts resulted in higher counts than the Baermann recovery technique and was the better choice of those flotation solutions examined. Furthermore, magnesium sulphate (sg 1.28) was also reliable for strongylid egg detection with the FLOTAC apparatus.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bowman DD (2009) Georgis' parasitology for veterinarians, 9th edn. Saunders, St. Louis Cringoli G (2006) FLOTAC, a novel apparatus for a multivalent faecal egg count technique. Parassitologia 48:381–384 Cringoli G, Rinaldi L, Veneziano V, Capelli G, Scala A (2004) The influence of flotation solution, sample dilution and the choice of McMaster slide area (volume) on the reliability of the McMaster technique in estimating the faecal egg counts of gastrointestinal strongyles and Dicrocoelium dendriticum in sheep. Vet Parasitol 123:121–131 Dunn AM (1978) Veterinary helminthology, 2nd edn. William Heinemann Medical Books Ltd, London Eysker M (1997) The sensitivity of the Baermann method for the diagnosis of primary Dictyocaulus viviparus infections in calves. Vet Parasitol 69:89–93 Gaglio G, Cringoli G, Rinaldi L, Brianti E, Giannetto S (2008) Use of the FLOTAC technique for the diagnosis of Aelurostrongylus abstrusus in the cat. Parasitol Res 103:1055–1057 Gordon HM, Whitlock HV (1939) A new technique for counting nematode eggs in sheep faeces. J Counc Sci Ind Res 12:50–52 Johnson M, Mackintosh CG, Labes RE, Taylor MJ, Wharton DA (2003) Dictyocaulus species: cross infection between cattle and red deer. N Z Vet J 51:93–98 Lyons ET, Drudge JH, Labore DE, Tolliver SC (1972) Field and controlled test evaluations of levamisole against natural infections of gastrointestinal nematodes and lungworms in calves. Am J Vet Res 33:65–71 Lyons ET, Patterson DJ, Johns JT, Giles RC, Tolliver SC, Collins SS, Stamper S (1995) Survey for internal parasites in cattle in Kentucky (1993). Vet Parasitol 58:163–168 MAFF (1986) Manual of veterinary parasitological laboratory techniques. HMSO Publications Centre, London Rode B, Jørgensen RJ (1989) Baermannization of Dictyocaulus spp. from faeces of cattle, sheep and donkeys. Vet Parasitol 30:205–211 Samuel WM, Trainer DO (1969) A technique for survey of some helminth and protozoan infections of white-tailed deer. J Wildl Manag 33:888–894 Stafford KJ, West DM, Pomroy WE (1994) Nematode worm egg output by ewes. N Z Vet J 42:30–32 Taylor MA, Coop RL, Wall RL (2007) Veterinary parasitology, 3rd edn. Blackwell, Oxford Watson PG, Charleston WAG (1985) The significance of parasites in farmed deer. In: Fennessy PF, Drew KR (eds) Biology of Deer Production, Bulletin 22. Royal Society of New Zealand, Wellington, pp 105–117 Whitlock HV (1948) Some modifications of the McMaster helminth egg-counting technique and apparatus. J Counc Sci Ind Res 21:177–180 Williams JC, Broussard SD (1995) Comparative efficacy of levamisole, thiabendazole and fenbendazole against cattle gastrointestinal nematodes. Vet Parasitol 58:83–90 Zajac AM, Conboy GA (2006) Veterinary clinical parasitology, 7th edn. Blackwell, Ames