Comparison of super-mini PCNL (SMP) versus Miniperc for stones larger than 2 cm: a propensity score-matching study

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 36 - Trang 955-961 - 2018
Yang Liu1, Jad AlSmadi1, Wei Zhu1, Yongda Liu1, Wenqi Wu1, Junhong Fan1, Yu Lan1, Wayne Lam2, Wen Zhong1, Guohua Zeng1
1Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, Guangzhou, China
2Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

Tóm tắt

To compare the efficacy and safety of Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP, F12-F14) and Miniperc (F18) in the treatment of renal stones of 2–4 cm in size. A prospective comparative analysis of outcomes of patients who underwent SMP and Miniperc for treatment of 2–4 cm renal stones was conducted between July 2014 and January 2017. Demographic data, stone criteria, operative technique, complications, blood transfusion, hemoglobin decrease, stone-free rate (SFR) and length of hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis was performed to further compare the outcomes between the two groups. 79 and 257 patients underwent SMP and Miniperc, respectively. After matching, 73 patients in each group were included. The stone burden was comparable for both groups (3.0 ± 1.1 vs 3.2 ± 0.7 cm, p = 0.577). Mean operation time was not significant different between two groups (p = 0.115), while the hospital stay of SMP was much shorter than Miniperc (2.6 ± 1.4 vs 5.2 ± 1.8, p < 0.0001). Both groups had similar SFRs in postoperative 1 day and at 1 month follow-up (p = 0.326, p = 0.153), while SMP achieved a markedly higher tubeless rate than Miniperc (84.9 vs 47.9%, p < 0.0001). The total complication rate was significantly lower in SMP (16.4 vs 41.1%, p = 0.0001), and the SIRS rate was markedly lower in SMP group (1.4 vs 12.3%, p = 0.009). SMP is equally effective as Miniperc in the treatment of moderate renal calculi, and has the significant advantage in hospital duration and tubeless rate.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K et al (2016) EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69(3):475–482 Ozturk U, Sener NC, Goktug HN, Nalbant I, Gucuk A, Imamoglu MA (2013) Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy, shock wave lithotripsy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi 10–20 mm. Urol Int 91(3):345–349 De S, Autorino R, Kim FJ et al (2015) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 67(1):125–137 Bader MJ, Gratzke C, Seitz M, Sharma R, Stief CG, Desai M (2011) The “all-seeing needle”: initial results of an optical puncture system confirming access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 59(6):1054–1059 Dede O, Sancaktutar AA, Dagguli M, Utangac M, Bas O, Penbegul N (2015) Ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric nephrolithiasis: both low pressure and high efficiency. J Pediatr Urol 11(5): 253 e251-256 Desai J, Zeng G, Zhao Z, Zhong W, Chen W, Wu W (2013) A novel technique of ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: introduction and an initial experience for treatment of upper urinary calculi less than 2 cm. Biomed Res Int 2013:490793 Silay MS, Tepeler A, Atis G et al (2013) Initial report of microperc in the treatment of pediatric nephrolithiasis. J Pediatr Surg 48(7):1578–1583 Ganpule AP, Bhattu AS, Desai M (2015) PCNL in the twenty-first century: role of microperc, miniperc, and ultraminiperc. World J Urol 33(2):235–240 Abdelhafez MF, Wendt-Nordahl G, Kruck S et al (2016) Minimally invasive versus conventional large-bore percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of large-sized renal calculi: surgeon’s preference? Scand J Urol 50(3):212–215 Mishra S, Sharma R, Garg C, Kurien A, Sabnis R, Desai M (2011) Prospective comparative study of miniperc and standard PNL for treatment of 1 to 2 cm size renal stone. BJU Int 108(6):896–899 (discussion 899–900) Sabnis RB, Ganesamoni R, Sarpal R (2012) Miniperc: what is its current status? Curr Opin Urol 22(2):129–133 Liu Y, Wu W, Tuerxun A et al (2017) Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of pediatric nephrolithiasis: evaluation of the initial results. J Endourol 31(S1):S38–S42 Zeng G, Wan S, Zhao Z et al (2016) Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP): a new concept in technique and instrumentation. BJU Int 117(4):655–661 Zeng G, Zhu W, Liu Y, Fan J, Zhao Z, Cai C (2017) The new generation super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) system: a step-by-step guide. BJU Int 120(5):735–738 Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K et al (2008) Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol 53(1):184–190 Bandi G, Best SL, Nakada SY (2008) Current practice patterns in the management of upper urinary tract calculi in the north central United States. J Endourol 22(4):631–636 Knoll T, Wezel F, Michel MS, Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G (2010) Do patients benefit from miniaturized tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? J Endourol 24(7):1075–1079 Yamaguchi A, Skolarikos A, Buchholz NP et al (2011) Operating times and bleeding complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparison of tract dilation methods in 5,537 patients in the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study. J Endourol 25(6):933–939 Sabnis RB, Ganesamoni R, Doshi A, Ganpule AP, Jagtap J, Desai MR (2013) Micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for the management of small renal calculi: a randomized controlled trial. BJU Int 112(3):355–361 Datta SN, Solanki R, Desai J (2016) Prospective outcomes of ultra mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a consecutive cohort study. J Urol 195(3):741–746 Cheng F, Yu W, Zhang X, Yang S, Xia Y, Ruan Y (2010) Minimally invasive tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones. J Endourol 24(10):1579–1582 Giusti G, Piccinelli A, Taverna G et al (2007) Miniperc? No, thank you! Eur Urol 51(3):810–814 (discussion 815) Guohua Z, Wen Z, Xun L et al (2007) The influence of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal pelvic pressure in vivo. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 17(4):307–310 Istanbulluoglu MO, Ozturk B, Gonen M, Cicek T, Ozkardes H (2009) Effectiveness of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients: a prospective randomized study. Int Urol Nephrol 41(3):541–545