Comparison of rigid and flexible obturation for surgical cleft of the soft palate

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry - Tập 54 - Trang 548-552 - 1985
Dorsey J. Moore1, Janice R. Pishney1, Timothy B. Welch1
1University of Missouri, School of Dentistry, Kansas City, Mo., U.S.A.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aramany, 1972, Effect of nasal extension sections on the voice quality of acquired cleft palate patients, J Prosthet Dent, 27, 194, 10.1016/0022-3913(72)90198-9 Walter, 1973, Concepts of soft palate prosthesis, J Dent, 1, 281, 10.1016/0300-5712(73)90109-7 Beumer, 1979, Maxillofacial Rehabilitation: Prosthodontic and Surgical Considerations, 267 Shalit, 1946, Obturator of choice for congenital cleft palate, Am J Orthod, 32, 688 Beery, 1983, Pharyngeal wall motion in prosthetically managed cleft palate adults, Cleft Palate J, 20, 7 Lubker, 1969, Nasal airflow as an index of success of prosthetic management of cleft palate, J Dent Res, 48, 368, 10.1177/00220345690480030801 Warren, 1964, A pressure-flow technique for measuring velopharyngeal orifice area during continuous speech, Cleft Palate J, 1, 52 Warren, 1965, A physiologic approach to cleft palate prosthesis, J Prosthet Dent, 15, 770, 10.1016/0022-3913(65)90051-X Warren, 1979, PERCI: A method for rating palatal efficiency, Cleft Palate J, 16, 279 Smith, 1983, Velopharyngeal orifice area prediction during aerodynamic simulation of fricative consonants, Cleft Palate J, 20, 1 Plank DM, Weinberg B, Chalian VA: Evaluation of speech following prosthetic obturation of surgically acquired maxillary defects.J Prosthet Dent45:626.