Comparison of different rheological parameters for rutting susceptibility of SBS + WMA modified binders
Tóm tắt
It is important to understand rutting susceptibility of asphalt binders at laboratory scale to ensure a long lasting pavement. Researchers have reported applicability of four rheological parameters: (1) Superpave parameter—G*/sinδ (2) Shenoy’s parameter—G*/(1−(1/tanδsinδ)), (3) non-recoverable creep compliance—J
nr, measured from multiple stress creep recovery test and (4) zero shear viscosity (ZSV) to evaluate rutting resistance of binders. However, comparison of these rutting parameters for warm mix additives (WMA) modified asphalt binders have not been reported in open literature. Thus, this study was undertaken to evaluate rutting performance of a SBS co-polymer modified binder (PMB40) containing three WMA additives using four rheological parameters listed above. Three different WMA additives: wax based (Sasobit®), water based (Advera®) and surfactant based (Rediset®) were selected in this study. Based on three parameters (Superpave, Shenoy and J
nr), it was found that addition of Sasobit® and Advera® help to improve rut resistance of PMB40 binder while Rediset® decreases rut resistance of the binder. The ZSV showed rut resistance improvement for all the additives, which is contrary to the results obtained from other three parameters. Both the Superpave and Shenoy parameters showed a similar trend in rutting resistance of the binder. The optimum dosage of Advera® and Sasobit® was determined based on the Superpave, Shenoy and J
nr parameters. Since, the addition of Rediset® resulted in decrease in rutting behavior, optimum dosage of Rediset® could not be ascertained. A good correlation was found between the Superpave rutting parameter (G*/sinδ) and other three parameters (G*/(1 − (1/tanδsinδ)), ZSV, and J
nr). The outcome of this study showed that, J
nr may be considered as a reliable rut parameter due to realistic test conditions associated with it. The Superpave parameter is more conservative compared to Shenoy parameter, and thus it may still be considered as an important rutting parameter in the absence of J
nr. The ZSV needs further validation to comment on its applicability.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Domingos MDI, Faxina AL (2015) Susceptibility of asphalt binders to rutting—literature review. ASCE J Mater Civ Eng 28 (2)
Dreessen S, Planche JP, Gardel V (2009) A new performance related test method for rutting prediction: MSCRT. In: Loizos A, Partl M, Scarpas T, Al-Qadi IL (eds) Advanced testing and characterisation of bituminous materials, vol 2. CRC Press/Balkema, Leiden, pp 971–980
Bahia HU, Anderson DA (1995) Strategic highway research program binder rheological parameters: background and comparison with conventional properties. Transportation Research Record 1488, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp 32–39
Sybilski D (1996) Evaluation of validity of conventional test methods in case of polymer-bitumens. Am Chem Soc Div Fuel Chem 41(4):1302–1306
Roberts FL, Kandhal PS, Brown ER, Lee D-Y, Kennedy TW (1996) Hot mix asphalt materials, mixture design and construction, 2nd edn. National Asphalt Pavement Association Research and Education Foundation, Lanham
D’Angelo JA (2009) The relationship of the MSCR test to rutting. Road Mater Pavement Design 10(sup1):61–80
Tabatabaee N, Tabatabaee H (2010) Multiple stress creep and recovery and time sweep fatigue tests: crumb rubber modified binder and mixture performance. Transp Res Record J Transp Res Board 2180:67–74
Wasage TLJ, Stastna J, Zanzotto L (2011) Rheological analysis of multi-stress creep recovery (MSCR) test. Int J Pavement Eng 12(6):561–568
Biro S, Gandhi T, Amirkhanian S (2009) Determination of zero shear viscosity of warm asphalt binders. Constr Build Mater 23(5):2080–2086
Bouldin MG, Dongré R, D’Angelo J (2001) Proposed refinement of Superpave high-temperature specification parameter for performance-graded binders. Transportation Research Record 1766, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp 40–47
Desmazes C, Lecomte M, Lesueur D, Phillips M (2000) A protocol for reliable measurement of zero-shear-viscosity in order to evaluate the anti-rutting performance of binders. 2nd eurasphalt & eurobitume Congress. European Asphalt Pavement Association and European Bitumen Association, Brussels, pp 203–211
D’Angelo J, Kluttz R, Dongré R, Stephens K, Zanzotto L (2007) Revision of the Superpave high temperature binder specification: the multiple stress creep recovery test. J Assoc Asphalt Paving Technol 76:123–162
Morea F, Agnusdei JO, Zerbino R (2010) Comparison of methods for measuring zero shear viscosity in asphalts. Mater Struct 43(4):499–507
Shenoy A (2001) Refinement of the Superpave specification parameter for performance grading of asphalt. J Transp Eng 127(5):357–362
Chen J-S, Tsai C-J (1999) How good are linear viscoelastic properties of asphalt binder to predict rutting and fatigue cracking? J Mater Eng Perform 8(4):443–449
Shenoy A (2004) A comprehensive treatise of the high temperature specification parameter G*/(1 − (1/tanδsinδ)) for performance grading of asphalts. Appl Rheol 14(6):303–314
Shenoy A (2004) High temperature performance grading of asphalts through a specification criterion that could capture field performance. J Transp Eng 1(132):132–137. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2004)130
Shenoy A (2008) Nonrecovered compliance from dynamic oscillatory test vis-à-vis nonrecovered compliance from multiple stress creep recovery test in the dynamic shear rheometer. Int J Pavement Eng 9(5):329–341
De Visscher J, Vanelstraete A (2004) Practical test methods for measuring the zero shear viscosity of bituminous binders. Mater Struct 37(5):360–364
Phillips MC, Robertus C (1996) Binder rheology and asphaltic pavement permanent deformation; the zero-shear-viscosity. In: eurasphalt & eurobitume Congress, Strasbourg, 7–10 May 1996. vol 3. paper E&E. 5.134
Van Rooijen RC, de Bondt AH (2004) Experience with the zero-shear viscosity concept to characterise rutting. In: proceeding of the 3rd Eurasphalt and Eurobitume congress held Vienna, 2004 (vol 2)
Divya PS, Gideon CS, Murali Krishnan J (2012) Influence of the type of binder and crumb rubber on the creep and recovery of crumb rubber modified bitumen. J Mater Civ Eng 25(4):438–449
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (2013) Standard specification for performance-graded asphalt binder, AASHTO designation: MP 19
Kataware AV, Singh D (2015) Rheological performance of asphalt binders under different creep and recovery periods in MSCR test. Int J Pavement Res Technol 8(6):410
Zapata P, Gambatese JA (2005) Energy consumption of asphalt and reinforced concrete pavement materials and construction. J Infrastruct Systems 11(1):9–20
Toraldo E, Brovelli C, Mariani E (2013) Laboratory investigation into the effects of working temperatures on wax-based warm mix asphalt. Constr Build Mater 44:774–780
Gandhi T, Akisetty C, Amirkhanian S (2009) Laboratory evaluation of warm asphalt binder aging characteristics. Int J Pavement Eng 10(5):353–359
Hurley GC, Prowell BD (2005) Evaluation of Sasobit for use in warm mix asphalt. NCAT report 5(06)
Merusi F, Giuliani F (2011) Rheological characterization of wax-modified asphalt binders at high service temperatures. Mater Struct 44(10):1809–1820
Akisetty CK, Gandhi T, Lee SJ, Amirkhanian SN (2010) Analysis of rheological properties of rubberized binders containing warm asphalt additives. Can J Civ Eng 37(5):763–771
Sampath A (2010) Comprehensive evaluation of four warm asphalt mixture regarding viscosity, tensile strength, moisture sensitivity, dynamic modulus and flow number. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Iowa
Rubio MC, Martínez G, Baena L, Moreno F (2012) Warm mix asphalt: an overview. J Clean Prod 24:76–84
Behl A, Chandra S, Aggarwal VK, Gangopadhyay S (2014) Zero shear viscosity of bitumen-filler mastics of warm-mix binders. J Mater Civ Eng