Comparison of current tonometry techniques in measurement of intraocular pressure

Journal of Current Ophthalmology - Tập 29 - Trang 92-97 - 2017
Behrooz Kouchaki1, Hassan Hashemi2,1, Abbasali Yekta3, Mehdi khabazkhoob4,1
1Noor Research Center for Ophthalmic Epidemiology, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran
2Noor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye hospital, Tehran, Iran
3Department of Optometry, School of Paramedical Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
4Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Tài liệu tham khảo

Babalola, 2009, A comparison of the Goldmann applanation and non-contact (Keeler Pulsair EasyEye) tonometers and the effect of central corneal thickness in indigenous African eyes, Ophthalmic Physiol Opt, 29, 182, 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00621.x Ogbuehi, 2006, Assessment of the accuracy and reliability of the Topcon CT80 non-contact tonometer, Clin Exp Optom, 89, 310, 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2006.00068.x Kniestedt, 2008, Tonometry through the ages, Surv Ophthalmol, 53, 568, 10.1016/j.survophthal.2008.08.024 ElMallah, 2008, New ways to measure intraocular pressure, Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 19, 122, 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3282f391ae Tonnu, 2005, The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, non-contact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry, Br J Ophthalmol, 89, 851, 10.1136/bjo.2004.056622 Pache, 2005, Dynamic contour tonometry versus goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study, Ger J Ophthalmol, 243, 763 Martinez-de-la-Casa, 2006, Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry, Ophthalmology, 113, 2156, 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.016 Kaufmann, 2004, Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 45, 3118, 10.1167/iovs.04-0018 Kotecha, 2010, Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers, Ophthalmology, 117, 730, 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.09.020 Lee, 2009, Comparison between dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry, Korean J Ophthalmol, 23, 27, 10.3341/kjo.2009.23.1.27 Medeiros, 2006, Evaluation of the influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurements using the ocular response analyzer, J Glaucoma, 15, 364, 10.1097/01.ijg.0000212268.42606.97 Martinez-de-la-Casa, 2006, Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 47, 4410, 10.1167/iovs.06-0158 Mollan, 2008, Accuracy of goldmann, ocular response analyser, pascal and tonopen XL tonometry in keratoconic and normal eyes, Br J Ophthalmol, 92, 1661, 10.1136/bjo.2007.136473 Ang, 2008, Corneal biomechanical properties in primary open angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma, J Glaucoma, 17, 259, 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31815c3a93 Touboul, 2008, Correlations between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, and corneal central pachymetry, J Cataract Refract Surg, 34, 616, 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.11.051 Detry-Morel, 2010, Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the reichert ocular response analyzer, Eur J Ophthalmol, 21, 138, 10.5301/EJO.2010.2150 Bayoumi, 2010, Ocular response analyzer and goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study of findings, J Glaucoma, 19, 627, 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181ca7e01