Comparison of an inertial sensor system of lameness quantification with subjective lameness evaluation

Equine Veterinary Journal - Tập 44 Số 6 - Trang 652-656 - 2012
Megan J. McCracken1, Joanne Kramer1, Kevin G. Keegan1, Marco A. F. Lopes1, David A. Wilson1, Shannon K. Reed1, Alison M. LaCarrubba1, Michael E. Scharf1
1Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA

Tóm tắt

Summary

Reasons for performing study:Subjective evaluation of mild lameness has been shown to have poor interobserver reliability. Traditional methods of objective lameness evaluation require specialised conditions and equipment. Wireless inertial sensor systems have been developed to allow for simple, rapid, objective lameness detection in horses trotted over ground.

Objective:The purpose of this study was to compare the sensitivities of an inertial sensor system and subjective evaluation performed by experienced equine practitioners at detecting lameness in horses. We hypothesised that the inertial sensor system would identify lameness at a lower level of sole pressure than a consensus of 3 experienced equine veterinarians.

Methods:Fifteen horses were fitted with special shoes that allowed for lameness induction via sole pressure. Horses were simultaneously evaluated by 3 equine veterinarians and a wireless inertial sensor system. Horses were subjected to multiple trials: 1) before inserting the screw; 2) after inserting the screw to just touch the sole; and 3) after tightening the screw in half turn increments. The number of screw turns required for lameness identification in the correct limb by the inertial sensors and by consensus of 3 equine veterinarians was compared using the Wilcoxon test.

Results:The inertial sensor system selected the limb with the induced lameness after fewer screw turns than did the 3 veterinarians (P<0.0001). The inertial sensor system selected the correct limb before the 3 veterinarians in 35 trials (58.33%), the evaluators selected the correct limb before the inertial sensors in 5 trials (8.33%), and in 20 trials (33.33%) they selected the correct limb at the same time.

Potential relevance:The inertial sensor system was able to identify lameness at a lower level of sole pressure than the consensus of 3 equine veterinarians. The inertial sensor system may be an effective aid to lameness localisation in clinical cases.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

USDANational economic cost of equine lameness colic and equine protozoal myeloencephalitis in the United States. USDA : APHIS : VS National Health Monitoring System. Information sheet. Fort Collins (CO).2001. #N348.1001.

10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.10.012

10.1136/vr.159.11.346

10.2746/042516409X479568

Keegan K.G., 1998, Evaluation of mild lameness in horses trotting on a treadmill by clinicians and interns or residents and correlation of their assessments with kinematic gait analysis, Am. J. Vet. Res., 59, 1370, 10.2460/ajvr.1998.59.11.1370

Pratt G.W., 1976, Force plate studies of equine biomechanics, Am. J. Vet. Res., 37, 1251

Merkens H.W., 1988, Evaluation of equine locomotion during differing degrees of experimentally induced lameness. I. Lameness model and quantification of ground reaction force patterns of the limbs, Equine Vet. J., Suppl., 6, 99, 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1988.tb04655.x

Merkens H.W., 1988, Evaluation of equine locomotion during differing degrees of experimentally induced lameness II. Distribution of ground reaction force patterns of the concurrently loaded limbs, Equine Vet. J., Suppl., 6, 107, 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1988.tb04656.x

10.2460/ajvr.2002.63.520

10.2460/ajvr.2000.61.979

10.1111/j.2042-3306.1996.tb01591.x

10.1111/j.2042-3306.1996.tb01592.x

10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb05064.x

10.2746/042516408X250184

10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.665

10.2746/042516407X185719

10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.741

10.2460/ajvr.72.9.1156

10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.1805

10.2307/1418725