Comparison of Transradial and Transfemoral Approaches for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Intervention in Patients with Coronary Bypass Grafts

Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine - Tập 21 - Trang 2-5 - 2020
Hisham Hirzallah1, Ahmed Amro2, Damir Kusmic1, Zachary Curtis1, Emilia C. Leigh1, Yazan Numan1, Julia Parsons1, Mohammad Amro3, Sutoidem Akpanudo1, Rameez Sayyed2, Mehiar Elhamdani2
1Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, United States of America
2Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Disease, United States of America
3Misr University for Science and Technology, Egypt

Tài liệu tham khảo

Agostoni, 2004, Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials, J Am Coll Cardiol, 44, 349, 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.034 Hamon, 2011, Impact of transradial and transfemoral coronary interventions on bleeding and net adverse clinical events in acute coronary syndromes, EuroIntervention, 7, 91, 10.4244/EIJV7I1A16 Jolly, 2011, Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial, Lancet, 377, 1409, 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2 Rao, 2008, Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 1, 379, 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.05.007 Jolly, 2009, Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials, Am Heart J, 157, 132, 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.08.023 Romagnoli, 2012, Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome) study, J Am Coll Cardiol, 60, 2481, 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.017 Valgimigli, 2012, Transradial versus transfemoral intervention for acute myocardial infarction: a propensity score-adjusted and -matched analysis from the REAL (REgistro regionale AngiopLastiche dell'Emilia-Romagna) multicenter registry, JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 5, 23, 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.08.018 Bundhoo, 2012, Saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention via radial artery access: safe and effective with reduced hospital length of stay, Am Heart J, 164, 468, 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.07.029 Rathore, 2009, The feasibility of percutaneous transradial coronary intervention for saphenous vein graft lesions and comparison with transfemoral route, J Interv Cardiol, 22, 336, 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2009.00479.x Sanmartin, 2006, Transradial cardiac catheterization in patients with coronary bypass grafts: feasibility analysis and comparison with transfemoral approach, Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 67, 580, 10.1002/ccd.20633 Ziakas, 2005, A comparison of the radial and the femoral approach in vein graft PCI. A retrospective study, Int J Cardiovasc Intervent, 7, 93, 10.1080/14628840510011270 Michael, 2013, A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG trial (RADIAL versus femoral access for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention), JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 6, 1138, 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.004 Sandhu, 2017, Expert opinion: transradial coronary artery procedures: tips for success, Interv Cardiol, 12, 18, 10.15420/icr.2017:2:2 Campeau, 1989, Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography, Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 16, 3, 10.1002/ccd.1810160103 Kiemeneij, 1997, A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study, J Am Coll Cardiol, 29, 1269, 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00064-8 Pappy, 2011, Effect of statin therapy on contrast-induced nephropathy after coronary angiography: a meta-analysis, Int J Cardiol, 151, 348, 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.05.045 Baker, 2001, Prevention of contrast nephropathy after cardiac catheterisation, Heart, 85, 361, 10.1136/heart.85.4.361 Rear, 2016, Contrast-induced nephropathy following angiography and cardiac interventions, Heart, 102, 638, 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306962 Sedhai, 2017, Contrast-induced nephropathy after cardiac catheterization: culprits, consequences and predictors, Am J Med Sci, 354, 462, 10.1016/j.amjms.2017.05.010 Ryu, 2017, Impact of chronic kidney disease in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: improved but not solved, Korean Circ J, 47, 176, 10.4070/kcj.2017.0013 Sarnak, 2003, Kidney disease as a risk factor for development of cardiovascular disease: a statement from the American Heart Association Councils on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, High Blood Pressure Research, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Prevention, Circulation, 108, 2154, 10.1161/01.CIR.0000095676.90936.80 Ix, 2003, Association between renal insufficiency and inducible ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease: the heart and soul study, J Am Soc Nephrol, 14, 3233, 10.1097/01.ASN.0000095642.25603.7A Chen, 2004, The metabolic syndrome and chronic kidney disease in U.S. adults, Ann Intern Med, 140, 167, 10.7326/0003-4819-140-3-200402030-00007 Kaysen, 2004, The role of oxidative stress-altered lipoprotein structure and function and microinflammation on cardiovascular risk in patients with minor renal dysfunction, J Am Soc Nephrol, 15, 538, 10.1097/01.ASN.0000111744.00916.E6 Drey, 2003, A population-based study of the incidence and outcomes of diagnosed chronic kidney disease, Am J Kidney Dis, 42, 677, 10.1016/S0272-6386(03)00916-8 Muntner, 2002, Renal insufficiency and subsequent death resulting from cardiovascular disease in the United States, J Am Soc Nephrol, 13, 745, 10.1681/ASN.V133745 Shlipak, 2004, Creatinine levels and cardiovascular events in women with heart disease: do small changes matter?, Am J Kidney Dis, 43, 37, 10.1053/j.ajkd.2003.08.044 Lange, 2006, Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure during coronary angiography and intervention by radial or femoral approach, Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 67, 12, 10.1002/ccd.20451 Neill, 2010, Comparison of radiation dose and the effect of operator experience in femoral and radial arterial access for coronary procedures, Am J Cardiol, 106, 936, 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.06.002 Philippe, 2004, Comparison of transradial vs. transfemoral approach in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction with primary angioplasty and abciximab, Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 61, 67, 10.1002/ccd.10675 Shah, 2013, Radiation exposure during coronary angiography via transradial or transfemoral approaches when performed by experienced operators, Am Heart J, 165, 286, 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.08.016 Brueck, 2009, A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty, JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2, 1047, 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.07.016 Achenbach, 2008, Transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and intervention in patients above 75 years of age, Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 72, 629, 10.1002/ccd.21696 Li, 2007, Safety and feasibility of emergent percutaneous coronary intervention with the transradial access in patients with acute myocardial infarction, Chin Med J (Engl), 120, 598, 10.1097/00029330-200704010-00014 Louvard, 2002, Transradial approach for coronary angioplasty in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: a dual-center registry, Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 55, 206, 10.1002/ccd.10120 Roberts, 2008, Lesion complexity and angiographic outcomes in radial access percutaneous coronary intervention, J Interv Cardiol, 21, 555, 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2008.00399.x Brasselet, 2008, Comparison of operator radiation exposure with optimized radiation protection devices during coronary angiograms and ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions by radial and femoral routes, Eur Heart J, 29, 63, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm508