Comparison of Polynomial Cam Profiles and Input Shaping for Driving Flexible Systems

Brice Pridgen, William Singhose1
1e-mail:  George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0405

Tóm tắt

Polynomial profiles can be used as reference commands to limit induced vibration in flexible systems. Due to their ease of design and low-pass filtering effects, polynomial profiles are often found in cam-follower systems. Polynomial profiles have also been used as smooth reference commands for automated machines. However, despite extensive work to develop and improve such profiles, inherent tradeoffs still exist between induced vibration, rise time, and ease of design. Input shaping is an alternative method for generating motion commands that reduce residual vibration. This paper compares polynomial profiles to input-shaped commands for the application of reducing vibration in flexible systems. Analyses using Laplace transforms reveal that input shapers suppress vibration at regularly spaced frequencies. However, polynomial profiles do not share this property. Simulations and experimental results show that input shaping improves rise time and reduces residual vibration in comparison to polynomial profiles.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

1998, Influence of Cam Motions on the Dynamic Behavior of Return Springs, J. Mech. Des., 120, 305, 10.1115/1.2826973

1982, Mechanics and Design of Cam Mechanisms

Meckl, P. H., Arestides, P. B., and Woods, M. C., 1998, “Optimized S-Curve Motion Profiles for Minimum Residual Vibration,” American Control Conference, Philadelphia, PA.

2009, Motion Profile Design to Reduce Residual Vibration of High-Speed Positioning Stages, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron., 14, 264, 10.1109/TMECH.2008.2012160

1975, Dynamic Synthesis of Cams Using Finite Trigonometric Series, ASME J. Eng. Ind., 287

1998, Designing Dynamically Compensated and Robust Cam Profiles With Bernstein-Bézier Harmonic Curves, J. Mech. Des., 120, 40, 10.1115/1.2826674

2007, Controlling the Frequency Content of Inertia Forces in Dwelling Cam-Follower Systems, J. Mech. Des., 129, 546, 10.1115/1.2712222

1993, Cam Motion Synthesis Using Cubic Splines, J. Mech. Des., 115, 441, 10.1115/1.2919209

1995, A New Family of Parameterized Polynomials for Cam Motion Synthesis, J. Mech. Des., 117, 653, 10.1115/1.2826737

1995, Minimizing Residual Vibrations in High-Speed Cam-Follower Systems Over a Range of Speeds, J. Mech. Des., 117, 166, 10.1115/1.2826102

1993, Automatic Planning of Smooth Trajectories for Pick-and-Place Operations, J. Mech. Des., 115, 450, 10.1115/1.2919211

Vaclavik, M., and Jirasko, P., 2007, “Research and Application of Displacement Laws of Electronic Cams,” 12th IFToMM World Congress.

1958, Feedback Control Systems

1990, Preshaping Command Inputs to Reduce System Vibration, J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 112, 76, 10.1115/1.2894142

2009, Command Shaping for Flexible Systems: A Review of the First 50 Years, Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., 10, 153, 10.1007/s12541-009-0084-2

2004, A Simple Procedure for Modifying High-Speed Cam Profiles for Vibration Reduction, ASME J. Mech. Des., 126, 1105-08

1999, Comparison of Filtering Methods for Reducing Residual Vibration, Eur. J. Control, 5, 208, 10.1016/S0947-3580(99)70155-X

2011, Reducing Vibration by Digital Filtering and Input Shaping, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 19, 1410, 10.1109/TCST.2010.2093135

2004, Cam Design Handbook

Eloundou, R., and Singhose, W., 2002, “Interpretation of S-Curve Reference Commands as Input-Shaped Functions,” American Control Conference, Anchorage, AK.

2010

1994, Residual Vibration Reduction Using Vector Diagrams to Generate Shaped Inputs, ASME J. Mech. Des., 116, 654, 10.1115/1.2919428

2010, Command Generation for Flexible Systems by Input Shaping and Command Smoothing, AIAA J. Guid. Control Dyn., 33, 1697, 10.2514/1.50270

Peng, K. C. C., and Singhose, W., 2009, “Crane Control Using Machine Vision and Wand Following,” IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics, Malaga, Spain.

1997, Time-Optimal Negative Input Shapers, ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control, 119, 198, 10.1115/1.2801233

Lawrence, J., and Singhose, W., 2005, “Design of Minicrane for Education and Research,” 6th International Conference on Research and Education in Mechatronics, Annecy, France.