Comparison of Monte Carlo Simulation, Least Square Fitting and Calibration Factor Methods for the Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty Using Direct Pressure Indicating Devices

General requirements for the competence of testing and Calibration Laboratories (First Revision), ISO/IEC Document-17025:2005.

R. Kumar, S. Rab, B.D. Pant, S. Maji and R.S. Mishra, FEA-based design studies for development of diaphragm force transducers. MAPAN-J. Metrol. Soc India (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-018-0292-2 .

S. Yadav, A.K. Bandyopadhyay and A.C. Gupta, Evaluation of associated uncertainties using linear squares best-fit lines for electromechanical transducers, J. Inst. Eng. (ID), 86 (2005) 49–53.

S. Yadav, V.K. Gupta, O. Prakash and A.K. Bandyopadhyay, Evaluation of associated uncertainties in calibration of direct pressure indicating electromechanical devices, Meas. Sci. Rev. 5 (2005) 104–114.

R. Kumar, S. Rab, B.D. Pant and S. Maji, Design, development and characterization of MEMS silicon diaphragm force sensor. Vacuum 153 (2018) 211–216.

BIPM, IEC, ISO IFCC, IUPAP, IUPAC, OIML, Evaluation of measurement data guide for the expression of uncertainty in measurement. JCGM 100 (2008).

I. BIPM, I. IFCC, I. ISO, IUPAP and OIML, Evaluation of measurement data—supplement 1 to the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement”—propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method. Joint committee for guides in metrology. JCGM 101 (2008). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.

M.G. Cox, B.R.L. Siebert, The use of a Monte Carlo method for evaluating uncertainty and expanded uncertainty, Metrologia 43 (2006) S178.

S. Yadav and A.K. Bandyopadhyay, A proposal for evaluation of associated uncertainties in calibration of direct pressure indicating electromechanical devices, Callab. Int. J. Metrol. 13, (2006) 32–37.

S. Yadav, Characterization of dead weight testers and computation of associated uncertainties: a case study of contemporary techniques, Metrol. Meas. Syst. 14 (2007) 453–469.

Indicating and Recording Pressure Gauges, Vacuum gauges and pressure-vacuum gauges with elastic sensing elements (Ordinary Instruments), OIML International Recommendation (OIML R 101) (1991).

W. Sabuga, D.A. Olson, J.C. Torres, S. Yadav, Y. Jin, T. Kobata and P. Otal, Final report on key comparison CCM.P-K13 in the range 50 MPa to 500 MPa of hydraulic gauge pressure, Metrologia 49, Tech. Suppl., (2012) 07006.

R.G. Driver, D.A. Olson, S. Yadav, A.K. Bandyopadhyay, Final report on APMP.SIM. MP-K7: bilateral comparison between NIST (USA) and CSIR-NPLI (India) in the hydraulic pressure region 40 MPa to 200 MPa. Metrologia 43 (2006) 1–15.

S. Yadav, A.K. Bandyopadhyay, N. Dilawar and A.C. Gupta, Intercomparison of national hydraulic pressure standards up to 500 MPa. Meas Control 35 (2002) 47–51.