Baayen, 2008, Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items, Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390, 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
Badin, 2002, Three-dimensional linear articulatory modelling of tongue, lips and face, based on MRI and video images, Journal of Phonetics, 30, 533, 10.1006/jpho.2002.0166
Bates, 2010
Bele, 2006, The speaker's formant, Journal of Voice, 20, 555, 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.07.001
Boersma, P., Weenink, D., 2010. Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.1.32. Retrieved from: http://www.praat.org/ (retrieved 30.04.10).
Bond, 1989, Acoustic-phonetic characteristics of speech produced in noise and while wearing an oxygen mask, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 907, 10.1121/1.397563
Bořil, H., 2008. Robust speech recognition: analysis and equalization of Lombard effect in Czech corpora. Ph.D. dissertation. Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic.
Bradlow, 1996, Intelligibility of normal speech I: global and fine-grained acoustic–phonetic talker characteristics, Speech Communication, 20, 255, 10.1016/S0167-6393(96)00063-5
Cooke, 2006, A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1562, 10.1121/1.2166600
Cooke, 2010, Spectral and temporal changes to speech produced in the presence of energetic and informational maskers, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128, 2059, 10.1121/1.3478775
Fant, 1968, Analysis and synthesis of speech processes, 173
Fitzpatrick, 2011, The effect of seeing the interlocutor on auditory and visual speech production in noise, 37
Fitzpatrick, M., Kim, J., Davis, C., 2012. The intelligibility of Lombard speech: communicative setting matters. Proceedings of Interspeech 2012. Paper ID Wed.o7c.05.
Garnier, M., 2007. Communiquer en environnement bruyant: de l‘adaptation jusqu’au forc¸age vocal [Communication in noisy environments: From adaptation to vocal straining]. Ph.D. Thesis. Univ. of Paris 6, France.
Hansen, 1996, Analysis and compensation of speech under stress and noise for environmental robustness in speech recognition, Speech Communication, 20, 151, 10.1016/S0167-6393(96)00050-7
Junqua, 1993, The Lombard reflex and its role on human listeners and automatic speech recognizers, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 510, 10.1121/1.405631
Kim, 2005, A visual concomitant of the Lombard reflex, 17
Kim, 2011, Hearing speech in noise: seeing a loud talker is better, Perception, 40, 853, 10.1068/p6941
Lane, 1971, The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 14, 677, 10.1044/jshr.1404.677
Lam, 2009, Speech to infants with a simulated hearing loss, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 2533, 10.1121/1.4783564
Leino, 2011, Formation of the actor's/speaker's formant: a study applying spectrum analysis and computer modeling, Journal of Voice, 25, 150, 10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.10.002
Liu, 2003, An association between mothers’ speech clarity and infants’ speech discrimination skills, Developmental Science, 6, F1, 10.1111/1467-7687.00275
Lombard, 1911, Le Signe de l’Elevation de la Voix, Annales Des Maladies de L’Oreille, Du Larynx Du Nez Et Du Pharynx, 37, 101
Lu, 2009, The contribution of changes in F0 and spectral tilt to increased intelligibility of speech produced in noise, Speech Communication, 51, 1253, 10.1016/j.specom.2009.07.002
Maeda, 2005, Face models based on a guided PCA of motion capture data: speaker dependant variability in/s/-/z/contrast production, ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 40, 95, 10.21248/zaspil.40.2005.260
Mixdorff, 2007, Map task dialogs in noise—a paradigm for examining Lombard speech, 1329
Newman, 2001, The perceptual consequences of acoustic variability in fricative production within and across talkers, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 1181, 10.1121/1.1348009
Reschef, 2011, Detecting novel associations in large data sets, Science, 334, 1518, 10.1126/science.1205438
Summers, 1988, Effects of noise on speech production: acoustic and perceptual analyses, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 917, 10.1121/1.396660
Uchanski, 1992, Effects of token variability on vowel identification, 291