Comparing stressor-specific indices and general measures of taxonomic composition for assessing the status of boreal lacustrine macrophyte communities

Aguiar, 2011, Choosing the best method for stream bioassessment using macrophyte communities: indices and predictive models, Ecol. Indic., 11, 379, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.06.006 Alahuhta, 2009, Defining the ecological status of small forest lakes using multiple biological quality elements and palaeolimnological analysis, Fundam. Appl. Limnol., 175, 203, 10.1127/1863-9135/2009/0175-0203 Alahuhta, 2012, Response of macrophyte communities and status metrics to natural gradients and land use in boreal lakes, Aquat. Bot., 103, 106, 10.1016/j.aquabot.2012.07.003 Aroviita, 2008, The impact of water-level regulation on littoral macroinvertebrate assemblages in boreal lakes, Hydrobiologia, 613, 45, 10.1007/s10750-008-9471-4 Aroviita, 2008, A priori typology-based prediction of benthic macroinvertebrate fauna for ecological classification of rivers, Environ. Manage., 42, 894, 10.1007/s00267-008-9173-8 Aroviita, 2009, Influence of geographical extent on typology- and model-based assessments of taxonomic completeness of river macroinvertebrates, Freshwater Biol., 54, 1774, 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02210.x Aroviita, 2010, River bioassessment and the preservation of threatened species: towards acceptable biological quality criteria, Ecol. Indic., 10, 789, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.12.007 Beck, 2009, A review of research on the development of lake indices of biotic integrity, Environ. Rev., 17, 21, 10.1139/A09-001 Beck, 2010, Development of a macrophyte-based index of biotic integrity for Minnesota lakes, Ecol. Indic., 10, 968, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.02.006 Biondini, 1988, Data-dependent permutation techniques for the analysis of ecological data, Vegetatio, 75, 161, 10.1007/BF00045630 Cao, 2010, Quantifying the responses of macroinvertebrate assemblages to simulated stress: are more accurate similarity indices less useful?, Methods Ecol. Evol., 1, 380, 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00040.x Clarke, 2006, Effects of locally rare taxa on the precision and sensitivity of RIVPACS bioassessment of freshwaters, Freshwater Biol., 51, 1924, 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01611.x Coops, 1996, Helophyte zonation in two regulated estuarine areas in the Netherlands: vegetation analysis and relationships with hydrodynamic factors, Estuaries, 22, 657, 10.2307/1353053 Daan, 2005, An afterthought: ecosystem metrics and pressure indicators, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 62, 612, 10.1016/j.icesjms.2005.01.019 Diekmann, 2003, Species indicator values as an important tool in applied plant ecology – a review, Basic Appl. Ecol., 4, 493, 10.1078/1439-1791-00185 Dodkins, 2005, An application of canonical correspondence analysis for developing ecological quality assessment metrics for river macrophytes, Freshwater Biol., 50, 891, 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2005.01360.x Dudley, B., Dunbar, M., Penning, E., Kolada, A., Hellsten, S., Kanninen, A., 2011. Deliverable D3.2-2: report on uncertainty in macrophyte metrics. http://www.wiser.eu/results/deliverables/. Ecke, 2010, Potential conflicts between environmental legislation and conservation exemplified by aquatic macrophytes, Hydrobiologia, 656, 107, 10.1007/s10750-010-0424-3 Ellenberg, 1991, Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa, Scripta Geobot., 18, 1 European Commission, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a frame-work for community action in the field of water policy. Official J. Eur. Commun. 43, 1–72. Gasith, 1998, Structuring role of macrophytes in lakes: changing influence along lake size and depth gradients, Ecol. Stud., 131, 382 Hallstan, 2012, Comparison of classification-then-modelling and species-by-species modelling for predicting lake phytoplankton assemblages, Ecol. Model., 231, 11, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.01.018 Haury, 2006, A new method to assess water trophy and organic pollution – the Macrophyte Biological Index for Rivers (IBMR): its application to different types of river and pollution, Hydrobiologia, 570, 153, 10.1007/s10750-006-0175-3 Hatton-Ellis, 2008, The Hitchhiker's guide to the Water Framework Directive, Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst., 18, 111, 10.1002/aqc.947 Hawkins, 2006, Quantifying biological integrity by taxonomic completeness: its utility in regional and global assessments, Ecol. Appl., 16, 1277, 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1277:QBIBTC]2.0.CO;2 Hawkins, 2010, The reference condition: predicting benchmarks for ecological and water-quality assessments, J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 29, 312, 10.1899/09-092.1 Hawkins, 2010, Method of predicting reference condition biota affects the performance and interpretation of ecological indices, Freshwater Biol., 55, 1066, 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02357.x Heino, 2008, Aquatic plant biodiversity at high latitudes: patterns of richness and rarity in Finnish freshwater macrophytes, Boreal Environ. Res., 13, 1 Hellsten, 2001, Effects of water level regulation on aquatic macrophyte stands in northern Finland and options to predict these impacts under varying conditions, Acta Bot. Fenn., 171, 1 Hellsten, 2002, Aquatic macrophytes as indicators of water level regulation in northern Finland, Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol., 28, 601 Hellsten, 2009, Macrophyte responses to water level fluctuation in Fennoscandinavian lakes – applying a common index, Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol., 30, 765 Hering, 2010, The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: a critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future, Sci. Total Environ., 408, 4007, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.05.031 Hering, 2006, Cook book for the development of a Multimetric Index for biological condition of aquatic ecosystems: experiences from the European AQEM and STAR projects and related initiatives, Hydrobiologia, 566, 311, 10.1007/s10750-006-0087-2 Hill, 2000, Extending Ellenberg's indicator values to a new area: an algorithmic approach, J. Appl. Ecol., 37, 3, 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00466.x Holmes, 2009, The development and application of Mean Trophic Rank (MTR), 115 Ilmavirta, 1986, Comparative studies on macrophytes and phytoplankton in ten small, brown-water lakes of different trophic status, Aqua Fenn., 16, 125 Joy, 2002, Predictive modelling of freshwater fish as a biomonitoring tool in New Zealand, Freshwater Biol., 47, 2261, 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00954.x Jyväsjärvi, 2010, Palaeolimnological validation of estimated reference values for a lake profundal macroinvertebrate metric (Benthic Quality Index), J. Paleolimnol., 44, 253, 10.1007/s10933-009-9401-0 Jyväsjärvi, 2011, Evaluation of approaches for measuring taxonomic completeness of lake profundal macroinvertebrate assemblages, Freshwater Biol., 56, 1876, 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02603.x Kanninen, A., Vallinkoski, V.-M., Leka, J., 2009. Vesikasvillisuus pienten humusjärvien tilan arvioinnissa ja seurannassa. In: Kanninen, A. (Ed.), Pienten humusjärvien ekologisen tilan arviointi (Ecological Status Assessment of Small Humic Lakes). Suomen ympäristö 42/2009, pp. 21–49. Kanninen, 2013, A comparison of two methods for surveying aquatic macrophyte communities in boreal lakes: implications for bioassessment, Aquat. Bot., 104, 88, 10.1016/j.aquabot.2012.09.002 Karr, 1991, Biological integrity – a long-neglected aspect of water-resource management, Ecol. Appl., 1, 66, 10.2307/1941848 Keto, 2006, The effect of water level regulation on species richness and abundance of aquatic macrophytes in Finnish lakes, Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol., 29, 2103 Keto, 2008, Use of the water-level fluctuation analysis tool (Regcel) in hydrological status assessment of Finnish lakes, Hydrobiologia, 613, 133, 10.1007/s10750-008-9478-x Kilgour, 2004, A comparison of the sensitivity of stream benthic community indices to effects associated with mines, pulp and paper mills, and urbanization, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 23, 212, 10.1897/02-412 Kolada, A., Hellsten, S., Søndergaard, M., Mjelde, M., Dudley, B., van Geest, G., Goldsmith, B., Davidson, T., Bennion, H., Nõges, P., Bertrin, V., 2011. Deliverable D3.2-3: report on the most suitable lake macrophyte based assessment methods for impacts of eutrophication and water level fluctuations. http://www.wiser.eu/results/deliverables/. Lacoul, 2006, Environmental influences on aquatic plants in freshwater ecosystems, Environ. Rev., 14, 89, 10.1139/a06-001 Leka, J., Toivonen, H., Leikola, N., Hellsten, S., 2008. Vesikasvit Suomen järvien tilan ilmentäjinä – Ekologisen tilaluokittelun kehittäminen (Macrophytes as Indicators of the Ecological Quality of Finnish Lakes – Development of Ecological Classification). Suomen ympäristö 18/2008, pp. 1–53. Linkola, 1933, Regionale Artenstatistik der Siisswasserflora Finnlands, Ann. Bot. Soc. Zool. Bot. Fenn. Vanamo, 3, 3 McCune, 2002 Meador, 2008, Use of tolerance values to diagnose water-quality stressors to aquatic biota in New England streams, Ecol. Indic., 8, 718, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.01.002 Minns, 1994, An index of biotic integrity (IBI) for fish assemblages in the littoral zone of Great Lakes’ areas of concern, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 51, 1804, 10.1139/f94-183 Mjelde, M., Hellsten, S., Ecke, F. A water level drawdown index for aquatic macrophytes in Nordic lakes. Hydrobiologia, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1323-6, in press. Moss, 1987, The prediction of the macroinvertebrate fauna of unpolluted running-water sites in Great-Britain using environmental data, Freshwater Biol., 17, 41, 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1987.tb01027.x Mykrä, 2012, Spatial and temporal variability of diatom and macroinvertebrate communities: how representative are ecological classifications within a river system?, Ecol. Indic., 18, 208, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.11.007 Nilsson, 1988, Predictability of change in shoreline vegetation in a hydroelectric reservoir, northern Sweden, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 45, 1896, 10.1139/f88-221 Nõges, 2010, Primary production of aquatic macrophytes and their epiphytes in two shallow lakes (Peipsi and Võrtsjärv) in Estonia, Aquat. Ecol., 44, 83, 10.1007/s10452-009-9249-4 Norris, 1995, The need for biological assessment of water-quality – Australian perspective, Aust. J. Ecol., 20, 1, 10.1111/j.1442-9993.1995.tb00516.x Novak, 1992, Percent Model Affinity: a new measure of macroinvertebrate community composition, J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 11, 80, 10.2307/1467884 Ostermiller, 2004, Effects of sampling error on bioassessments of stream ecosystems: application to RIVPACS-type models, J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 23, 363, 10.1899/0887-3593(2004)023<0363:EOSEOB>2.0.CO;2 Partanen, 2005, Changes of emergent aquatic macrophyte cover in seven large boreal lakes in Finland with special reference to water level regulation, Fennia, 183, 57 Partanen, 2006, The relationship between water level fluctuation and the distribution of emergent aquatic macrophytes in large, mildly regulated lakes in the Finnish Lake District, Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol., 29, 1160 Penning, 2008, Classifying aquatic macrophytes as indicators of eutrophication in European lakes, Aquat. Ecol., 42, 237, 10.1007/s10452-008-9182-y Penning, 2008, Using aquatic macrophyte community indices to define the ecological status of European lakes, Aquat. Ecol., 42, 253, 10.1007/s10452-008-9183-x Poikane, 2011, Lake ecological assessment systems and intercalibration for the European Water Framework Directive: aims, achievements and further challenges, Proc. Environ. Sci., 9, 153, 10.1016/j.proenv.2011.11.024 Rask, 2010, Ecological classification of large lakes in Finland: comparison of classification approaches using multiple quality elements, Hydrobiologia, 660, 37, 10.1007/s10750-010-0384-7 Rørslett, 1989, The genus Isoëtes in Scandinavia – an ecological review and perspectives, Aquat. Bot., 35, 223, 10.1016/0304-3770(89)90001-6 Rørslett, 1991, Principal determinants of aquatic macrophyte richness in northern European lakes, Aquat. Bot., 39, 173, 10.1016/0304-3770(91)90031-Y Schneider, 2003, The Trophic Index of Macrophytes (TIM) – a new tool for indicating the trophic state of running waters, Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., 88, 49, 10.1002/iroh.200390005 Smyth, 2007, Defining acceptable levels for ecological indicators: an approach for considering social values, Environ. Manage., 39, 301, 10.1007/s00267-005-0282-3 Stoddard, 2006, Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition, Ecol. Appl., 16, 1267, 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1267:SEFTEC]2.0.CO;2 Sutela, 2013, Assessing ecological status of regulated lakes with littoral macrophyte, macroinvertebrate and fish assemblages, Ecol. Indic., 24, 185, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.06.015 Toivonen, 1995, Aquatic macrophytes and ecological gradients in 57 small lakes in southern Finland, Aquat. Bot., 51, 197, 10.1016/0304-3770(95)00458-C Tolonen, 2010, Comparison of sampling methods and habitat types for detecting impacts on lake littoral macroinvertebrate assemblages along a gradient of human disturbance, Fundam. Appl. Limnol., 176, 43, 10.1127/1863-9135/2010/0176-0043 Valta-Hulkkonen, 2005, Assessment of aerial photography as a method for monitoring aquatic vegetation in lakes of varying trophic status, Boreal Environ. Res., 10, 57 Van Sickle, 2008, An index of compositional dissimilarity between observed and expected assemblages, J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 27, 227, 10.1899/07-111.1 Vuori, K.-M., Mitikka, S., Vuoristo, H. (Eds.), 2009. Pintavesien ekologisen tilan luokittelu (Classification of the Ecological Status of Surface Waters in Finland). Environmental Guide 3, Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki. Willby, 2009 Wright, 1998, River classification using invertebrates: RIVPACS applications, Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst., 8, 617, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0755(199807/08)8:4<617::AID-AQC255>3.0.CO;2-#