Comparing scenario reduction methods for stochastic transmission planning

IET Generation, Transmission and Distribution - Tập 13 Số 7 - Trang 1005-1013 - 2019
SangWoo Park1,2, Qingyu Xu2, Benjamin F. Hobbs2
1Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, USA
2Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Sauma E.E., 2006, Proactive planning and valuation of transmission investments in restructured electricity markets, J. Regul. Econ., 30, 358, 10.1007/s11149-006-9012-x

Pozo D., 2013, If you build it, he will come: antici‐pative power transmission planning, Energy Econ., 36, 135, 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.12.007

Li A. Gobbs B.F. Ho J. et al.: ‘Co‐optimization of transmission and other supply resources’ Prepared for NARUC 2013

Awad M., 2010, Restructured electric power systems: analysis of electricity markets with equilibrium models

10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2279654

Weijde A.H., 2012, The economics of planning electricity transmission to accommodate renewables: using two‐stage optimisation to evaluate flexibility and the cost of disregarding uncertainty, Energy Econ., 34, 2089, 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.02.015

10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2204073

Wong W. Chao H. Julian D. et al.:at‘Transmission planning in a deregulated environment’.IEEE Transmission and Distribution Conf. New Orleans LA USA vol. 1 April1999 pp.350–355

10.1098/rsta.2016.0305

10.1049/iet-gtd.2014.0376

10.1016/j.epsr.2005.02.002

Sun Z. Li W. Zhu J. et al.: ‘a planning method for siting and sizing of distributed generation based on chance‐constrained programming’.Int. Conf. on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies Changsha China 2015 pp.527–531

10.1287/mnsc.6.1.73

Hannan J., 1957, Contributions to the theory of games, volume III, annals of mathematics Studies, 97

‘2011–2012 Transmission Plan’ California ISO Technical Report March2012

‘Transmission Economic Assessment Methodology’ CAISO Technical Report June 2014

‘Regional Generation Outlet Study’ MW ISO Technical Report November2010

Bhattacharya A., 2016, Managing energy storage in microgrids: a multistage stochastic programming approach, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid

10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2363364

Qiu T. Xu B. Wang Y. et al.: ‘Stochastic multistage coplanning of transmission expansion and energy storage’ 2017 30 (1) pp.643–651

Ho J. Hobbs B.F. Donohoo‐Vallett P. et al.: ‘Planning transmission for uncertainty: applications and lessons for the western interconnection’ Report prepared for the (WECC) and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 2016

10.1023/A:1019206915174

Dupačová J., 2003, Scenario reduction in stochastic programming: an approach using probability metrics, Math. Program., 95, 493, 10.1007/s10107-002-0331-0

10.1287/mnsc.47.2.295.9834

10.1287/opre.2013.1174

Gröwe‐Kuska N. Heitsch H. Römisch W.: ‘Scenario reduction and scenario tree construction for power management problems’.Proc. IEEE PowerTech 3 Bologna Italy 2003

10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2016072

10.1109/TPWRS.2007.895164

10.1016/j.cor.2012.05.005

10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2082576

Dvorkin Y. Wang Y. Pandzic H. et al.: ‘Comparison of scenario reduction techniques for the stochastic unit commitment’.Proc. 2014 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting National harbor MD USA 2014 pp.1–5

10.1016/j.energy.2017.12.154

10.2307/1268522

Loomes G., 1982, Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty, Econ. J., 92, 805, 10.2307/2232669

10.1287/opre.30.5.961

10.1016/j.eneco.2017.03.022