Comparing extended versus standard time window for thrombectomy: caseload, patient characteristics, treatment rates and outcomes—a prospective single-centre study

Neuroradiology - Tập 63 - Trang 603-607 - 2020
Bence Gunda1, Ildikó Sipos1, Rita Stang1, Péter Böjti1, Levente Dobronyi1, Tímea Takács1, Tamás Berényi2, Balázs Futácsi3, Péter Barsi4, Gábor Rudas4, Balázs Kis5, István Szikora5, Dániel Bereczki1,6
1Department of Neurology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
2Department of Emergency Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
3Department of Radiology, Medical Imaging Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
4Department of Neuroradiology, Medical Imaging Centre, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
5National Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Budapest, Hungary
6MTA-SE Neuroepidemiological Research Group, Budapest, Hungary

Tóm tắt

New guidelines recommend thrombectomy up to 24 h in selected patients; however, the workload and benefit of extending time window are not known. We conducted a prospective single-centre study to determine the caseload, imaging and interventional need of extended time window. All consecutive ischemic stroke patients within 24 h from onset in an 11-month period were included. Thrombectomy eligibility in the 0–6 h time window was based on current guidelines; in the 6–24 h time window, it was based on a combination of DEFUSE 3 and DAWN study criteria using MRI to identify target mismatch. Clinical outcome in treated patients was assessed at 3 months. Within 24 h of onset, 437 patients were admitted. In the 0–6 h time window, 238 patients (54.5%) arrived of whom 221 (92.9%) underwent CTA or MRA, 82 (34.5%) had large vessel occlusion (LVO), 30 (12.6%) had thrombectomy and 11 (36.6%) became independent (mRS ≤ 2). In the extended 6–24 h time window, 199 patients (45.5%) arrived of whom 127 (63.8%) underwent CTA or MRA, 44 (22.1%) had LVO, 8 (4%) had thrombectomy and 4 (50%) became independent. Extending the time window from 6 to 24 h results in a 26.7% increase in patients receiving thrombectomy and a 36.4% increase of independent clinical outcome in treated patients at the price of a significantly increased burden of clinical and imaging screening due to the similar caseload but a smaller proportion of treatment eligible patients in the extended as compared with the standard time window.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T et al (2018) 2018 Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 49:e46–e99 Turc G, Bhogal P, Fischer U, Khatri P, Lobotesis K, Mazighi M, Schellinger PD, Toni D, de Vries J, White P, Fiehler J (2019) European Stroke Organisation (ESO) – European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) Guidelines on Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischaemic Stroke Endorsed by Stroke Alliance for Europe (SAFE). Eur Stroke J 4(1):6–12 Nogueira RG, Jadhav AP, Haussen DC, Bonafe A, Budzik RF, Bhuva P, Yavagal DR, Ribo M, Cognard C, Hanel RA, Sila CA, Hassan AE, Millan M, Levy EI, Mitchell P, Chen M, English JD, Shah QA, Silver FL, Pereira VM, Mehta BP, Baxter BW, Abraham MG, Cardona P, Veznedaroglu E, Hellinger FR, Feng L, Kirmani JF, Lopes DK, Jankowitz BT, Frankel MR, Costalat V, Vora NA, Yoo AJ, Malik AM, Furlan AJ, Rubiera M, Aghaebrahim A, Olivot JM, Tekle WG, Shields R, Graves T, Lewis RJ, Smith WS, Liebeskind DS, Saver JL, Jovin TG, DAWN Trial Investigators (2018) Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. N Engl J Med 378(1):11–21 Albers GW, Marks MP, Kemp S, Christensen S, Tsai JP, Ortega-Gutierrez S, McTaggart R, Torbey MT, Kim-Tenser M, Leslie-Mazwi T, Sarraj A, Kasner SE, Ansari SA, Yeatts SD, Hamilton S, Mlynash M, Heit JJ, Zaharchuk G, Kim S, Carrozzella J, Palesch YY, Demchuk AM, Bammer R, Lavori PW, Broderick JP, Lansberg MG, DEFUSE 3 Investigators (2018) Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med 378:708–718 Yang W, Kang DW, Gook HS, Ha S, Lee SH (2019) The clinical benefit and care burden of extending the window of endovascular thrombectomy for stroke in the emergency room. J Clin Neurol 15(2):168–174 Lee KJ, Kim BJ, Kim DE, Ryu WS, Han MK, Kim JT, Choi KH, Cho KH, Cha JK, Kim DH, Nah HW, Park JM, Kang K, Lee SJ, Kim JG, Oh MS, Yu KH, Lee BC, Hong KS, Cho YJ, Park TH, Lee KB, Lee J, Lee JS, Lee J, Bae HJ, Clinical Research Collaboration for Stroke in Korea (CRCS-K) Investigators (2018) Nationwide estimation of eligibility for endovascular thrombectomy based on the DAWN trial. J Stroke 20(2):277–279 Jadhav AP, Desai SM, Kenmuir CL, Rocha M, Starr MT, Molyneaux BJ, Gross BA, Jankowitz BT, Jovin TG (2018) Eligibility for endovascular trial enrollment in the 6- to 24-hour time window. Stroke 49:1015–1017 Vanacker P, Lambrou D, Eskandari A, Mosimann PJ, Maghraoui A, Michel P (2016) Eligibility and predictors for acute revascularization procedures in a stroke center. Stroke 47:1844–1849 Han JY, Tan IYL (2020) Retrospective single-centre experience on the effect of the DAWN trial on the utilisation pattern, diagnostic yield and accuracy of CT perfusions performed for suspected acute stroke. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 64:477–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13037 Pizzo E, Dumba M, Lobotesis K (2019) Cost-utility analysis of mechanical thrombectomy between 6 and 24 hours in acute ischemic stroke. Int J Stroke 13:1747493019830587