Comparing environmental impacts of beef production systems: A review of life cycle assessments

Alexandratos, 2012

Alig, 2012

Audsley, 2009

Beauchemin, 2010, Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from beef production in western Canada: a case study, Agric. Syst., 103, 371, 10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.008

Beauchemin, 2011, Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from beef production in western Canada – evaluation using farm-based life cycle assessment, Anim. Feed. Sci. Tech., 166–167, 663, 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.047

Bonesmo, 2013, Greenhouse gas emission intensities of grass silage based dairy and beef production: a systems analysis of Norwegian farms, Livest. Sci., 152, 239, 10.1016/j.livsci.2012.12.016

Capper, 2012, Is the grass always greener? Comparing the environmental impact of conventional, natural and grass-fed beef production systems, Animals, 2, 127, 10.3390/ani2020127

Capper, 2012, The environmental and economic impact of removing growth-enhancing technologies from U.S. beef production, J. Anim. Sci., 90, 3527, 10.2527/jas.2011-4870

Casey, 2006, Greenhouse gas emissions from conventional, agri-environmental scheme, and organic Irish suckler-beef units, J. Environ. Qual., 35, 231, 10.2134/jeq2005.0121

Casey, 2006, Quantification of GHG emissions from sucker-beef production in Ireland, Agric. Syst., 90, 79, 10.1016/j.agsy.2005.11.008

Cederberg, 2002

Cederberg, 2009

Cederberg, 2011, Including carbon emissions from deforestation in the carbon footprint of brazilian beef, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 1773, 10.1021/es103240z

Claassen, 2010

De Rancourt, 2006, Mediterranean sheep and goats production: an uncertain future, Small Rumin. Res., 62, 167, 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.08.012

De Vries, 2010, Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: a review of life cycle assessments, Livest. Sci., 128, 1, 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007

Dick, 2015, Life cycle assessment of beef cattle production in two typical grassland systems of southern Brazil, J. Clean Prod., 96, 426, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.080

Eady, 2011, On-farm greenhouse gas emissions and water use: case studies in the Queensland beef industry, Anim. Prod. Sci., 51, 667, 10.1071/AN11030

Edwards-Jones, 2009, Carbon footprinting of lamb and beef production systems: insights from an empirical analysis of farms in Wales, UK, J. Agric. Sci., 147, 707, 10.1017/S0021859609990165

FAO, 2002

FAOSTAT, 2013. Electronic Database of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN. Accessed October 2013. http://faostat.fao.org/

Foley, 2011, Whole-farm systems modelling of greenhouse gas emissions from pastoral suckler beef cow production systems, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 142, 222, 10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.010

Grunert, 2004, Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector—a review, Meat Sci., 66, 259, 10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00130-X

Guinée, J.B., Gorrée, M., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Kleijn, R., de Koning, A., van Oers, L., Wegener Sleeswijk, A., Suh, S., Udo de Haes, H.A., de Bruijn, H., van Duin, R., Huijbregts, M.A.J., Lindeijer, E., Roorda, A.A.H., van der Ven, B.L., Weidema B.P. (Eds.), 2002. Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment; Operational Guide to the ISO Standards. Institute for Environmental Sciences, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Henle, 2008, Identifying and managing the conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe – a review, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 124, 60, 10.1016/j.agee.2007.09.005

Hietala, 2015, Effect of replacement rate, crossbreeding and sexed semen on the efficiency of beef production from dairy herds in Finland, Acta. Agric. Scand. A, 64, 199

Holter, 1992, Methane prediction in dry and lactating holstein cows, J. Dairy Sci., 75, 2165, 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77976-4

Hünerberg, 2014, Feeding high concentrations of corn dried distillers’ grains decreases methane, but increases nitrous oxide emissions from beef cattle production, Agric. Syst., 127, 19, 10.1016/j.agsy.2014.01.005

ISO, 2006. Environmental management. The ISO 14000 family of international standards ISO standard collection on CD-rom, Genève, Switzerland.

Koknaroglu, 2007, Cultural energy analysis of pasturing systems for cattle finishing programs, J. Sustain. Agric., 30, 5, 10.1300/J064v30n01_03

LEI, 2008

Lovett, 2006, A systems approach to quantify greenhouse gas fluxes from pastoral dairy production as affected by management regime, Agric. Syst., 88, 156, 10.1016/j.agsy.2005.03.006

Lupo, 2013, Life-cycle assessment of the beef cattle production system for the northern great plains, USA, J. Environ. Qual., 42, 1386, 10.2134/jeq2013.03.0101

Mader, 2003, Environmental stress in confined beef cattle, J. Anim. Sci., 81, E110

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005

Modernel, 2013, Global versus local environmental impacts of grazing and confined beef production systems, Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 035052, 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035052

Mogensen, 2015, Greenhouse gas emissions from beef production systems in Denmark and Sweden, Livest. Sci., 174, 126, 10.1016/j.livsci.2015.01.021

Nguyen, 2010, Environmental consequences of different beef production systems in the EU, J. Clean. Prod., 18, 756, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.12.023

Nguyen, 2012, Effects of type of ration and allocation methods on the environmental impacts of beef-production systems, Livest. Sci., 145, 239, 10.1016/j.livsci.2012.02.010

OECD, 2001

Ogino, 2004, Environmental impacts of the Japanese beef-fattening system with different feeding lengths as evaluated by a life-cycle assessment method, J. Anim. Sci., 82, 2115, 10.2527/2004.8272115x

Ogino, 2007, Evaluating environmental impacts of the Japanese beef cow–calf system by the life cycle assessment method, Anim. Sci. J., 78, 424, 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2007.00457.x

Oishi, 2013, Economic and environmental impacts of changes in culling parity of cows and diet composition in Japanese beef cow–calf production systems, Agric. Syst., 115, 95, 10.1016/j.agsy.2012.09.007

Opio, 2013

Pelletier, 2010, Comparative life cycle environmental impacts of three beef production strategies in the Upper Midwestern United States, Agric. Syst., 103, 380, 10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.009

Peters, 2010, Red meat production in Australia: life cycle assessment and comparison with overseas studies, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 1327, 10.1021/es901131e

Phetteplace, 2001, Greenhouse gas emissions from simulated beef and dairy livestock systems in the United States, Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst., 60, 99, 10.1023/A:1012657230589

Picasso, 2014, Sustainability of meat production beyond carbon footprint: a synthesis of case studies from grazing systems in Uruguay, Meat Sci., 98, 346, 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.07.005

Pimentel, 1996

Plieninger, 2006, Traditional land-use and nature conservation in European rural landscapes, Environ. Sci. Policy, 9, 317, 10.1016/j.envsci.2006.03.001

Ridoutt, 2014, Carbon, water and land use footprints of beef cattle production systems in southern Australia, J. Clean Prod., 73, 24, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.012

Ridoutt, 2012, Water footprint of livestock: comparison of six geographically defined beef production systems, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 17, 165, 10.1007/s11367-011-0346-y

Ripoll-Bosch, 2013, Accounting for multi-functionality of sheep farming in the carbon footprint of lamb: a comparison of three contrasting Mediterranean systems, Agric. Syst., 116, 60, 10.1016/j.agsy.2012.11.002

Roer, 2013, Environmental impacts of combined milk and meat production in Norway according to a life cycle assessment with expanded system boundaries, Livest. Sci., 155, 384, 10.1016/j.livsci.2013.05.004

Rotz, 2013, A simulation-based approach for evaluating and comparing the environmental footprints of beef production systems, J. Anim. Sci., 91, 5427, 10.2527/jas.2013-6506

Ruviaro, 2015, Carbon footprint in different beef production systems on a southern Brazilian farm: a case study, J. Clean Prod., 96, 435, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.037

Seidel, 2014, Update on sexed semen technology in cattle, Animal, 8, S160, 10.1017/S1751731114000202

Sitz, 2005, Consumer sensory acceptance and value of domestic, Canadian, and Australian grass-fed beef steaks, J. Anim. Sci., 83, 2863, 10.2527/2005.83122863x

Skinner, 2008, High biomass removal limits carbon sequestration potential of mature temperate pastures, J. Environ. Qual., 37, 1319, 10.2134/jeq2007.0263

Smith, 2013, How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals?, Glob. Change Biol., 19, 2285, 10.1111/gcb.12160

Stackhouse-Lawson, 2012, Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systems, J. Anim. Sci., 90, 4641, 10.2527/jas.2011-4653

Thomassen, 2008, Attributional and consequential LCA of milk production, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 13, 339, 10.1007/s11367-008-0007-y

Thomassen, 2008, Life cycle assessment of conventional and organic milk production in the Netherlands, Agric. Syst., 96, 95, 10.1016/j.agsy.2007.06.001

Touchberry, 1992, Crossbreeding effects in dairy cattle: the Illinois experiment, 1949 to 1969, J. Dairy Sci., 75, 640, 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77801-1

Tuomisto, 2012, Does organic farming reduce environmental impacts? – a meta-analysis of European research, J. Environ. Manag., 112, 309, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.018

Udo, 1998, Livestock in resource-poor farming systems, Outlook Agric., 27, 237, 10.1177/003072709802700406

UNFCCC, 2014. Agenda Item 4: Report of the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action. Conference of the Parties, Lima, 1–12 December 2014.

Vergé, 2008, Greenhouse gas emissions from the Canadian beef industry, Agric. Syst., 98, 126, 10.1016/j.agsy.2008.05.003

Veysset, 2014, Variability in greenhouse gas emissions, fossil energy consumption and farm economics in suckler beef production in 59 French farms, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 188, 180, 10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.003

Weiler, 2014, Handling multi-functionality of livestock in a life cycle assessment: the case of smallholder dairying in Kenya, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 8, 29, 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.07.009

White, 2014, Optimizing diet and pasture management to improve sustainability of U.S. beef production, Agric. Syst., 130, 1, 10.1016/j.agsy.2014.06.004

White, 2013, An environmental, economic, and social assessment of improving cattle finishing weight or average daily gain within U.S. beef production, J. Anim. Sci., 91, 5801, 10.2527/jas.2013-6632

Williams, 2006

Zehetmeier, 2012, Does increasing milk yield per cow reduce greenhouse gas emissions? A system approach, Animal, 6, 154, 10.1017/S1751731111001467

Zonderland-Thomassen, 2014, Water footprint of beef cattle and sheep produced in New Zealand: water scarcity and eutrophication impacts, J. Clean Prod., 73, 253, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.025