Comparing alternative methods to estimate gravity models of bilateral trade

An G, Puttitanun T (2009) Revisiting McCallum’s border puzzle. Econ Dev Q 23: 167–170

Anderson JE, van Wincoop E (2003) Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. Am Econ Rev 93: 170–192

Anderson JE (1979) A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. Am Econ Rev 69: 106–116

Anderson JE, Marcouiller D (2002) Insecurity and the pattern of trade: an empirical investigation. Rev Econ Stat 84: 342–352

Andrews M, Schank T, Upward R (2006) Practical fixed effects estimation methods for the three-way error components model. Stata J 6: 461–481

Baier S, Bergstrand J (2009) Bonus vetus OLS: a simple approach for addressing the border-puzzle and other gravity issues. J Int Econ 77: 77–85

Baldwin R, DiNino V (2006) Euros and zeros: the common currency effect on trade in new goods. Center for economic policy research discussion papers no 5973

Baldwin R, Taglioni D (2006) Gravity for dummies and dummies for gravity

Baltagi BH, Egger P, Pfaffermayr M (2003) A generalized design for bilateral trade flow models. Econ Lett 80: 391–397

Bergeijk P, Oldersma H (1990) Detente, market-oriented reform and German unification: potential consequences for the World Trade System. Kyklos 43: 599–609

Bergstrand JH (1985) The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. Rev Econ Stat 67: 474–481

Bergstrand JH (1989) The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor-proportions theory in international trade. Rev Econ Stat 71: 143–153

Bergstrand JH (1990) The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson model, the Linder hypothesis and the determinants of bilateral intra-industry trade. Econ J 100: 1216–1229

Bikker A, de Vos A (1992) An international trade flow model with zero observations: an extension of the Tobit model. Bruss Econ Rev 135: 379–404

Bouet A, Mishra S, Roy D (2008) Does Africa trade less than it should, and if so, why?: the role of market access and domestic factors. International food policy research discussion paper no 770

Brun JF, Carrère C, Guillaumont P, de Melo J (2002) Has distance died? Evidence from a panel gravity model. World Bank Econ Rev 19: 99–120

Burger MJ, van Oort FG, Linders GM (2009) On the specification of the gravity model of trade: zeros, excess zeros and zero-inflated estimation. Spat Econ Anal 4: 167–190

Bussière M, Schnatz B (2009) Evaluating China’s integration in world trade with a gravity model based benchmark. Open Econ Rev 20: 85–111

Cafiso G (2008) The Euro’s influence upon trade: rose effect versus border effect. ECB working paper 941

Cheng IH, Wall HJ (2005) Controlling for heterogeneity in gravity models of trade and integration. Fed Reserv Bank St. Louis Rev 87: 49–63

Deardorff A (1998) Determinants of bilateral trade: does gravity work in a neoclassical world? In: Frankel JA (ed) The regionalization of the world economy, 1st edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 7–32

De Benedictis L, Vicarelli C (2005) Trade potentials in gravity panel data models. Top Econ Anal Policy 5: 1386–1417

Egger P (2000) A Note on the proper econometric specification of the gravity equation. Econ Let 66: 25–31

Egger P, Pfaffermayr M (2003) The proper panel econometric specification of the gravity equation: a three-way model with bilateral interaction effects. Empir Econ 28: 571–580

Egger P, Pfaffermayr M (2004) Distance, trade and FDI: a SUR Hausman-Taylor approach. J Appl Economet 19: 227–246

Egger P, Larch M, Staub K, Winkelmann R (2011) The trade effects of endogenous preferential trade agreements. Am Econ J Econ Policy 3: 113–143

Feenstra RC (2002) Border effects and the gravity equation: consistent methods for estimation. Scot J Polit Econ 49: 491–506

Fidrmuc J (2008) Gravity models in integrated panels. Empir Econ 37: 435–446

Fratianni M, Hoon-Oh CH (2007) On the relationship between RTA expansion and openness. Kelley School of Business, working paper no 13, Indiana University

Glick R, Rose AK (2002) Does a currency union affect trade? The time-series evidence. Eur Econ Rev 46: 1125–1151

Haq Z, Meilke K, Cranfield J (2010) Does the gravity model suffer from selection bias? Canadian agricultural trade policy research network working paper no 90884

Head K, Mayer T (2000) Non-Europe: the magnitude and causes of market fragmentation in the EU. Rev World Econ 127: 284–314

Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47: 153–161

Helliwell JF (1996) Do national borders matter for Quebec’s trade. Can J Econ 29: 507–522

Helpman E (1987) Imperfect competition and international trade: evidence from fourteen industrial countries. J Jpn Int Econ 1: 62–81

Helpman E, Melitz M, Rubinstein Y (2008) Estimating trade flows: trading partners and trading volumes. Q J Econ 123: 441–487

Henderson DJ, Millimet DL (2008) Is gravity linear?. J Appl Economet 23: 137–172

Hoon-Oh CH, Selmier WT II (2008) Expanding international trade beyond the RTA border: the case of ASEAN’s economic diplomacy. Econ Lett 100: 385–387

Kavallari A, Maas S, Schmitz PM (2008) Explaining German imports of olive oil: evidence from a gravity model. European association of agricultural economists international congress, August 26–29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium

Leamer E, Stern R (1971) Quantitative international economics. J Int Econ 1: 359–361

Linnemann H (1966) An Econometric study of international trade flows. Dissertation, Netherlands School of Economics

Linders GM, de Groot H (2006) Estimation of the gravity equation in the presence of zero flows. Tinbergen institute discussion papers 06-072/3

Liu X (2009) GATT/WTO promotes trade strongly: sample selection and model specification. Rev Int Econ 17: 428–446

Manning WG, Mulahy J (2001) Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform?. J Health Econ 20: 461–494

Martin W, Pham CS (2008) Estimating the gravity equation when zero trade flows are frequent. MPRA working paper 9453, University Library of Munich

Martínez-Zarzoso I, Nowak-Lehmann F, Vollmer S (2007) The log of gravity revisited (in revision). CEGE discussion paper 64, University of Göttingen

Mátyás L (1998) The gravity model: some econometric considerations. World Econ 21: 397–401

Melitz M (2003) The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71: 1695–1725

Melitz M (2007) North, South and distance in the gravity equation. Eur Econ Rev 51: 971–991

Micco A, Stein E, Ordoñez G (2003) The currency union effect on trade: early evidence from EMU. Econ Policy 18: 315–356

Rose AK, van Wincoop E (2001) National money as a barrier to international trade: the real case for currency union. Am Econ Rev 91: 386–390

Ruiz J, Vilarrubia JM (2007) The wise use of dummies in gravity models: export potentials in the Euromed region. Banco de España working papers 0720

Schiavo S (2007) Common currencies and FDI flows. Oxford Econ Pap 59: 536–560

Shepherd B, Wilson JS (2009) Trade facilitation in ASEAN member countries: measuring progress and assessing priorities. J Asian Econ 20: 367–383

Siliverstovs B, Schumacher D (2009) Estimating gravity equations: to log or not to log?.  Empir Econ 36: 645–669

Santos Silva JM, Tenreyro S (2006) The log of gravity. Rev Econ Stat 88: 641–658

Santos Silva JM, Tenreyro S (2008) Trading partners and trading volume: implementing the Helpman-Melitz-Rubinstein model empirically. CEPR discussion papers 0935

Shepotylo O (2009) Gravity with zeros: estimating trade potential of CIS countries. Kyiv School of economics discussion papers 16

Soloaga I, Winters A (2001) Regionalism in the nineties: what effect on trade?.  N Am J Econ Financ 12: 1–29

Wang ZK, Winters LA (1991) The trading potential of Eastern Europe. CEPR discussion paper 610

Wei SJ (1996) Intra-national versus international trade: how stubborn are nations in global integration? NBER working paper 5531

Westerlund J, Wilhelmsson F (2009) Estimating the gravity model without gravity using panel data. Appl Econ 43: 641–649

Wolf HC (1997) Patterns of intra- and inter-state trade. NBER working paper 5939

Yu M (2010) Trade, democracy, and the gravity equation. J Dev Econ 91: 289–300