Comparing Robot Embodiments in a Guided Discovery Learning Interaction with Children

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 7 Số 2 - Trang 293-308 - 2015
James Kennedy1, Paul Baxter1, Tony Belpaeme1
1Centre for Robotics and Neural Systems, Cognition Institute, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alfieri L, Brooks PJ, Aldrich NJ, Tenenbaum HR (2011) Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? J Educ Psychol 103(1):1

Bainbridge WA, Hart J, Kim ES, Scassellati B (2008) The effect of presence on human–robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 17th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN) 2008, Munich, pp 701–706. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2008.4600749

Bartneck C (2003) Interacting with an embodied emotional character. In: Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on designing pleasurable products and interfaces, ACM Press, Pittsburgh, pp 55–60

Baxter P, Wood R, Belpaeme T (2012) A touchscreen-based ’sandtray’ to facilitate, mediate and contextualise human–robot social interaction. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, ACM Press, New York, pp 105–106. doi: 10.1145/2157689.2157707

Baxter P, Wood R, Baroni I, Kennedy J, Nalin M, Belpaeme T (2013) Emergence of turn-taking in unstructured child–robot social interactions. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, IEEE Press, New York, pp 77–78

Baxter P, Kennedy J, Vollmer AL, de Greeff J, Belpaeme T (2014) Tracking gaze over time in hri as a proxy for engagement and attribution of social agency. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, ACM Press, Atlanta, pp 126–127

Begg I, Armour V, Kerr T (1985) On believing what we remember. Can J Behav Sci 17(3):199

Belpaeme T, Baxter P, Read R, Wood R, Cuayáhuitl H, Kiefer B, Racioppa S, Kruijff-Korbayová I, Athanasopoulos G, Enescu V, Looije R, Neerincx M, Demiris Y, Ros-Espinoza R, Beck A, Cañamero L, Hiolle A, Lewis M, Baroni I, Nalin M, Cosi P, Paci G, Tesser F, Sommavilla G, Humbert R (2012) Multimodal child–robot interaction: building social bonds. J Hum Robot Interact 1(2):33–53

Berry D, Butler L, de Rosis F (2005) Evaluating a realistic agent in an advice-giving task. Int J Hum Comput Stud 63(3):304–327

Breazeal C (2004) Social interactions in HRI: the robot view. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C 34(2):181–186. doi: 10.1109/TSMCC.2004.826268

Chi MT, Feltovich PJ, Glaser R (1981) Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cogn Sci 5(2):121–152

Crone EA, Jennings JR, Van der Molen MW (2004) Developmental change in feedback processing as reflected by phasic heart rate changes. Dev Psychol 40(6):1228

De Jong T, Van Joolingen WR (1998) Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Rev Educ Res 68(2):179–201

Dimitrov DM, Rumrill PD Jr (2003) Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change. Work 20(2):159–165

Guskey TR (2003) How classroom assessments improve learning. Educ Leadersh 60(5):6–11

Han J, Jo M, Park S, Kim S (2005) The educational use of home robots for children. In: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN) 2005, IEEE, Nashville, pp 378–383

Harvel C (2010) Guided discovery learning. In: Lee H (ed) Faith-based education that constructs: a creative dialogue between contructivism and faith-based education. Wipf and Stock Publishers, Eugene, pp 169–172

Hasegawa D, Cassell J, Araki K (2010) The role of embodiment and perspective in direction-giving systems. In: Proceedings of the AAAI fall workshop on dialog with robots, Arlington

Huang CM, Mutlu B (2013) Modeling and evaluating narrative gestures for humanlike robots. Proc Robot 2013:26–32

Kalyuga S (2008) Relative effectiveness of animated and static diagrams: an effect of learner prior knowledge. Comput Hum Behav 24(3):852–861

Kanda T, Hirano T, Eaton D, Ishiguro H (2004) Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: a field trial. Hum Comput Interact 19(1):61–84

Kanda T, Shimada M, Koizumi S (2012) Children learning with a social robot. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, ACM, Boston, pp 351–358

Kennedy J, Baxter P, Belpaeme T (2013) Constraining content in mediated unstructured social interactions: studies in the wild. In: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on affective interaction in naturalistic environments (AFFINE’13), at ACII’13, IEEE Computer Society, Madison, pp 728–733

Kennedy J, Baxter P, Belpaeme T (2014) Children comply with a robot’s indirect requests. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, ACM, NewYork, pp 198–199. doi: 10.1145/2559636.2559820

Kose-Bagci H, Ferrari E, Dautenhahn K, Syrdal DS, Nehaniv CL (2009) Effects of embodiment and gestures on social interaction in drumming games with a humanoid robot. Adv Robot 23(14):1951–1996

Kuhlthau C, Maniotes L, Caspari A (2007) Guided inquiry: learning in the 21st century. Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport

Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174

Leite I, Martinho C, Paiva A (2013) Social robots for long-term interaction: a survey. Int J Soc Robot 5(2):291–308. doi: 10.1007/s12369-013-0178-y

Leyzberg D, Spaulding S, Toneva M, Scassellati B (2012) The physical presence of a robot tutor increases cognitive learning gains. In: Proceedings of the 34th annual conference of the cognitive science society, CogSci 2012, pp 1882–1887

Leyzberg D, Spaulding S, Scassellati B (2014) Personalizing robot tutors to individual learning differences. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, ACM, Berkeley, pp 423–430

Looije R, van der Zalm A, Neerincx MA, Beun RJ (2012) Help, I need some body the effect of embodiment on playful learning. In: Proceedings of the 21st IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN) 2012, IEEE, Paris, pp 718–724. doi: 10.1109/ROMAN.2012.6343836

Lupyan G, Rakison DH, McClelland JL (2007) Language is not just for talking: redundant labels facilitate learning of novel categories. Psychol Sci 18(12):1077–1083

Macario JF (1991) Young children’s use of color in classification: foods and canonically colored objects. Cogn Dev 6(1):17–46

Merrill DC, Reiser BJ, Merrill SK, Landes S (1995) Tutoring: guided learning by doing. Cogn Instr 13(3):315–372

Moshkina L, Trickett S, Trafton JG (2014) Social engagement in public places: a tale of one robot. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, ACM, Bielefeld, pp 382–389

Mutlu B, Forlizzi J, Hodgins J (2006) A storytelling robot: modeling and evaluation of human-like gaze behavior. In: Proceedings of the 6th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots 2006, IEEE, Genova, pp 518–523

Myers CB, Myers SM (2007) Assessing assessment: the effects of two exam formats on course achievement and evaluation. Innov Higher Educ 31(4):227–236

Nalin M, Baroni I, Kruijff-Korbayová I, Canamero L, Lewis M, Beck A, Cuayáhuitl H, Sanna A (2012) Children’s adaptation in multi-session interaction with a humanoid robot. In: Proceedings of the 21st IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN) 2012, IEEE, Heijen, pp 351–357

Pereira A, Martinho C, Leite I, Paiva A (2008) iCat, the chess player: the influence of embodiment in the enjoyment of a game. In: Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, international foundation for autonomous agents and multiagent systems, vol 3, pp 1253–1256

Powers A, Kiesler S, Fussell S, Torrey C (2007) Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, IEEE, Washington DC, pp 145–152

Riek LD (2012) Wizard of oz studies in hri: a systematic review and new reporting guidelines. J Hum Robot Interact 1(1):119

Riggio RE, Friedman HS (1986) Impression formation: the role of expressive behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 50(2):421–427

Roediger HL, Karpicke JD (2006) The power of testing memory: basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspect Psychol Sci 1(3):181–210

Ros R, Nalin M, Wood R, Baxter P, Looije R, Demiris Y, Belpaeme T, Giusti A, Pozzi C (2011) Child–robot interaction in the wild: advice to the aspiring experimenter. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on multimodal interfaces, ACM, New York, pp 335–342

Saerbeck M, Schut T, Bartneck C, Janse MD (2010) Expressive robots in education: varying the degree of social supportive behavior of a robotic tutor. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, New York, CHI ’10, pp 1613–1622. doi: 10.1145/1753326.1753567

Schermerhorn P, Scheutz M (2011) Disentangling the effects of robot affect, embodiment, and autonomy on human team members in a mixed-initiative task. In: ACHI 2011, the fourth international conference on advances in computer–human interactions, pp 236–241

Scott SD, Sheelagh M, Carpendale T, Inkpen KM (2004) Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, ACM, New York, pp 294–303

Segura EM, Cramer H, Gomes PF, Nylander S, Paiva A (2012) Revive!: reactions to migration between different embodiments when playing with robotic pets. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on interaction design and children, ACM, New York, pp 88–97. doi: 10.1145/2307096.2307107

Smith JP III, Disessa AA, Roschelle J (1994) Misconceptions reconceived: a constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. J Learn Sci 3(2):115–163. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0302_1

Spencer JA, Jordan RK (1999) Learner centred approaches in medical education. BMJ 318(7193):1280–1283

Stanton CM, Kahn PH, Severson RL, Ruckert JH, Gill BT (2008) Robotic animals might aid in the social development of children with autism. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, IEEE, New York, pp 271–278

Szafir D, Mutlu B (2012) Pay attention!: designing adaptive agents that monitor and improve user engagement. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, New York, CHI’12, 11–20, doi: 10.1145/2207676.2207679

Tang A, Tory M, Po B, Neumann P, Carpendale S (2006) Collaborative coupling over tabletop displays. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, ACM, Montreal, pp 1181–1190

Tessmer M, Richey RC (1997) The role of context in learning and instructional design. Educ Technol Res Dev 45(2):85–115

Van Joolingen W (1998) Cognitive tools for discovery learning. Int J Artif Intell Educ 10:385–397

Walters ML, Woods S, Koay KL, Dautenhahn K (2005) Practical and methodological challenges in designing and conducting human–robot interaction studies. Proc AISB 5:110–119

Zaki J (2013) Cue integration a common framework for social cognition and physical perception. Perspect Psychol Sci 8(3):296–312