Comparative life cycle assessment of current and future electricity generation systems in the Czech Republic and Poland

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment - Tập 23 - Trang 2165-2177 - 2018
Dorota Burchart-Korol1, Pavlina Pustejovska2, Agata Blaut3, Simona Jursova2, Jerzy Korol3
1Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
2Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic
3Central Mining Institute, Katowice, Poland

Tóm tắt

The purpose of the study was to perform a comparative life cycle assessment of current and future electricity generation systems in the Czech Republic and Poland. The paper also outlines the main sources of environmental impact for the different impact categories for the electricity generation technologies analyzed. The analyses covered the years 2000–2050, and were conducted within the framework of the international programme Interreg V-A Czech Republic-Poland, Microprojects Fund 2014–2020 in the Euroregion Silesia. Environmental assessment was done using the life cycle assessment (LCA) and ReCiPe Midpoint and Endpoint methods, which allowed the presentation of different categories of environmental impact and damage. The LCA was based on ISO 14040 and ISO 14044, using SimaPro 8.2.3 software with the Ecoinvent 3.2 database. The analyses cover both the current electricity production structures in the Czech Republic and Poland, and the projected energy production. The LCA analyses performed for the energy systems under consideration in the Czech Republic and Poland enabled a comparative analysis of current and forecast energy systems in these countries, as well as identification of the main sources of environmental impact. Comparative analysis of the LCA results showed that current and future electricity generation systems in Poland caused higher environmental impact there, than in the Czech Republic. The assessment of the life cycle of electricity sources showed that the main determinant of the negative impact on the environment of energy systems in both Poland and the Czech Republic was the consumption of solid fuels, and in particular, the consumption of lignite. It is important to highlight that this is the first attempt of a comparative LCA of electricity production in the Czech Republic and Poland. This is also the first approach that contains analyses of the life cycle assessment of both present and future energy systems. The economic assessment and eco-efficiency of current and future electricity generation systems in European Union countries will be addressed in future research.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adamczyk J, Dzikuć M (2014) The analysis of suppositions included in the Polish Energetic Policy using the LCA technique—Poland case study. Renew Sust Energ Rev 39:42–50 Bieda B (2011) Life cycle inventory of energy production in ArcelorMittal steel power plant Poland S.A. in Krakow, Poland. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:503–511 Burchart-Korol D, Korol J, Czaplicka-Kolarz K (2016) Life cycle assessment of heat production from underground coal gasification. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1391–1403 Czaplicka-Kolarz K, Burchart-Korol D, Krawczyk P (2014) Analiza wrażliwości ekoefektywności technologii produkcji energii w procesie opartym na naziemnym zgazowaniu węgla. Przem Chem 93:1910–1915 (in Polish) Dzikuć M, Adamczyk J (2015) The ecological and economic aspects of a low emission limitation: a case study for Poland. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:217–225 Electricity Information Overview (2017) The International Energy Agency http://www.iea.org Energy Policies of IEA Countries - Czech Republic (2016) Review (2016). The International Energy Agency http://www.iea.org Energy Policies of IEA Countries - Poland (2016) Review (2016) The International Energy Agency http://www.iea.org EU Reference Scenario (2016) Energy, transport and GHG emissions—trends to 2050 (2016) The European Commission report European Commission (2011a) Energy Roadmap 2050, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(2011) 885 final, Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/ European Commission (2011b) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, A Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050, COM(2011) 112 final, Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/ European Commission (2011c) Energy Roadmap 2050 – Impact assessment and scenario analysis. Commission Staff Working Paper. SEC(2011) 1565 final, Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/ European Commission (2011d) Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council - Two years after Paris – Progress towards meeting the EU's climate commitments, COM(2017) 646 final, Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/ European Commission (2017) Report on European Electricity Markets, Directorate-General for Energy, Market Observatory for Energy, Available online at http://ec.europa.eu/ Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, De Schryver A, Struijs J, Van Zelm R (2013) ReCiPe 2008 A life cycle impact assessment method with comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level, Ruimte en Milieu, Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer Honus S, Kumagai S, Němček O, Yoshioka T (2016a) Replacing conventional fuels in USA, Europe, and UK with plastic pyrolysis gases—part I: experiments and graphical interchangeability methods. Energy Convers Manag 126:1118–1127 Honus S, Kumagai S, Yoshioka T (2016b) Replacing conventional fuels in USA, Europe, and UK with plastic pyrolysis gases—part II: multi-index interchangeability methods. Energy Convers Manag 126:1128–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.054 Koci V, Trecakova T (2011) Mixed municipal waste management in the Czech Republic from the point of view of the LCA method. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:113–124 Kulczycka J, Pietrzyk-Sokulska E (2012) Evaluation of energy sector in Poland. Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow Lelek Ł, Kulczycka J, Lewandowska A, Zarebska J (2016) Life cycle assessment of energy generation in Poland. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1–14 Lewandowska A, Noskowiak A, Pajchrowski G, Zarebska J (2015) Between full LCA and energy certification methodology—a comparison of six methodological variants of buildings environmental assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(1):9–22 Mikołajczyk U, Bujak-Pietrek S, Szadkowska-Stańczyk I (2010) Narażenie na pył w górnictwie węglowym. Analiza na podstawie pomiarów wykonanych przez laboratoria badań środowiska pracy w Polsce w latach 2001–2005. Med Pr 61:287–297 (in Polish) Pang MY, Zhang LX, Wang CB, Liu GY (2015) Environmental life cycle assessment of small hydropower plant in China. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:796–806 World Energy Resources Report (2016) World Energy Council, Available online at https://www.worldenergy.org World Energy Scenarios Report (2016) World Energy Council, Available online at https://www.worldenergy.org