Comparative dose levels between CT-scanner and slot-scanning device (EOS system) in pregnant women pelvimetry

Physica Medica - Tập 33 - Trang 77-86 - 2017
A. Ben Abdennebi1,2,3, S. Aubry4,3, L. Ounalli2,5, M. S. Fayache1,2, Éric Delabrousse4,3, Yolande Petegnief3
1Faculty of Mathematical, Physical and Natural Sciences of Tunis, 2092 El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
2Laboratory on Energy and Matter for Nuclear Sciences Development, LR16CNSTN02, Tunisia
3Regional and University Hospital of Besançon, 25000 Besançon, France
4Nanomedicine Lab Imagery and Therapeutics EA 4662, University of Franche-Comte, 25000 Besancon, France
5National Center for Nuclear Sciences and Technology, 2020 Ariana, Tunisia

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Brent R, Mettler F, Wagner L, Streffer C, Berry M, He S, Kusama T. Pregnancy and medical radiation ICRP Publication 84. Ann. 2001;ICRP 30.

Economides, 2014, Prevention of and response to inadvertent exposure of embryo/fetus to ionizing radiation, due tomedical exposure of the mother. The Greek regulatory authorityinitiatives, Phys Med, 30, 155, 10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.04.005

Thompson, 2001, Maintaining a proper perspective of risk associated with radiation exposure, Nucl Med Technol, 29, 137

Zeng, 2001, Communicating radiation exposure: a simple approach, Nucl Med Technol, 29, 156

EC, 1999, Guidance on diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for medical exposures, Radiat Prot, 109, 11

Doshi, 2008, Fetal radiation dose from CT pulmonary angiography in late pregnancy: a phantom study, Br Radiol, 81, 653, 10.1259/bjr/22775594

Keller, 2003, Obstetric MR pelvimetry: reference values and evaluation of inter- and intra observer error and intra individual variability, Radiology, 227, 37, 10.1148/radiol.2271011658

Toppenberg, 1999, Safety of radiographic imaging during pregnancy, Am Family Physician, 59, 1813

Dowsett David J, Kenny Patrick A, Eugene Johnston R. The physics of diagnostic imaging, 2nd ed.;2006;0–0.

Angel, 2008, Radiation dose to the fetus for pregnant patients undergoing multi detector CT imaging: Monte carlo simulations estimating fetal dose for a range of gestational age and patient size, Radiology, 249, 220, 10.1148/radiol.2491071665

Kneale, 1976, Mantel-Haenszel analysis of Oxford data. II. Independent effects of fetal irradiation subfactors, Natl Cancer Inst, 57, 1009, 10.1093/jnci/57.5.1009

Sigmann, 2014, An evaluation of the EOS X-ray imaging system in pelvimetry, Diagn Interventional Imaging, 95, 833, 10.1016/j.diii.2014.01.021

Pomerantz, 2015, Three-dimensional biplanar radiography as a new means of accessing femoral version: a comparitive study of EOS three-dimensional radiography versus computed tomography, Skeletal Radiol, 44, 255, 10.1007/s00256-014-2031-2

Melhem, 2016, EOS biplanar X-ray imaging: concept, developments, benefits and limitations, Child Orthop, 10, 1, 10.1007/s11832-016-0713-0

Damet, 2014, Occupational and patient exposure as well as image quality for full spine examinations with the EOS imaging system, Med Phys, 41, 063901, 10.1118/1.4873333

Anderson, 1983, X-ray pelvimetry: helpful or harmful?, Fam Pract, 17, 405

Sibony, 2006, Vaginal birth after cesarean section: X-ray pelvimetry at termis informative, Perinat Med, 34, 212, 10.1515/JPM.2006.037

Thomas, 1998, Trends in the use of pelvimetry techniques, Clin Radiol, 53, 293, 10.1016/S0009-9260(98)80130-X

Breidt, 2003, Helical CT pelvimetry: advantages of a low dose volume acquisition technique, Radiology, 84, 1027

Sigmann, 2014, An evaluation of the EOS X-ray imaging system in pelvimetry, Diagn Interventional Imaging, 95, 833, 10.1016/j.diii.2014.01.021

McKenna, 2012, EOS 2D/3D X-ray imaging system: a systematic review and economic evaluation, Health Technol Assess, 16, 14, 10.3310/hta16140

Després, 2005, Evaluation of a full-scale gas microstrip detector for low-dose X-ray imaging, Nucl Inst Methods Phys Res, 536, 52, 10.1016/j.nima.2004.07.169

Greffier, 2016, CT dose reduction using automatic exposure control and iterative reconstruction: a chest pediatric phantoms study, Phys Med, 32, 582, 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.03.007

Jermoumi, 2015, Comprehensive quality assurance phantom for the small animal radiation research platform (SARRP), Phys Med, 31, 529, 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.04.010

Al-Senan, 2011, Characteristics of an OSLD in the diagnostic energy range, Med Phys, 38, 4396, 10.1118/1.3602456

International Commission of Radiological Protection. The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP Publication 103; 2007.

Deschênes, 2010, Diagnostic imaging of spinal deformities: reducing patients radiation dose with a new slot-scanning X-ray imager, Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 35, 989, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bdcaa4

Giles, 1956, Malignant disease in childhood and diagnostic irradiation in utero, Lancet, 271, 447

Stewart, 1970, Radiation dose effects in relation to obstetric x-rays and childhood cancers, Lancet, 1, 1185, 10.1016/S0140-6736(70)91782-4

Doll, 1997, Risk of childhood cancer from fetal irradiation, Br Radiol, 70, 130, 10.1259/bjr.70.830.9135438

Osei, 1999, Fetal doses from radiological examinations, Br Radiol, 72, 773, 10.1259/bjr.72.860.10624343

Bittersohl, 2013, EOS imaging of the human pelvis: reliability, validity, and controlled comparison with radiography, Bone Joint Surg Am, 95, e58, 10.2106/JBJS.K.01591

Folinais, 2013, Measuring femoral and rotational alignment: EOS system versus computed tomography, Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 99, 509, 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.12.023

Lazennec, 2011, Pelvis and total hip arthroplasty acetabular component orientations in sitting and standing positions: measurements reproductibility with EOS imaging system versus conventional radiographies, Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 97, 373, 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.02.006

Dubousset, 2005, Anew2Dand3D imagingapproachto musculo-skeletal physiology and pathology with low dose radiation and the standing position: the EOS system, Bull Acad Natl Med, 189, 287