Comparative analysis of differential network modularity in tissue specific normal and cancer protein interaction networks

ClinTransMed, AB - Tập 3 - Trang 1-23 - 2013
Md Fahmid Islam1, Md Moinul Hoque1, Rajat Suvra Banik1, Sanjoy Roy2, Sharmin Sultana Sumi1, F M Nazmul Hassan1, Md Tauhid Siddiki Tomal1, Ahmad Ullah1, K M Taufiqur Rahman1
1Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna, Bangladesh
2Forestry and Wood Technology Discipline, Khulna University, Khulna, Bangladesh

Tóm tắt

Large scale understanding of complex and dynamic alterations in cellular and subcellular levels during cancer in contrast to normal condition has facilitated the emergence of sophisticated systemic approaches like network biology in recent times. As most biological networks show modular properties, the analysis of differential modularity between normal and cancer protein interaction networks can be a good way to understand cancer more significantly. Two aspects of biological network modularity e.g. detection of molecular complexes (potential modules or clusters) and identification of crucial nodes forming the overlapping modules have been considered in this regard. In the current study, the computational analysis of previously published protein interaction networks (PINs) has been conducted to identify the molecular complexes and crucial nodes of the networks. Protein molecules involved in ten major cancer signal transduction pathways were used to construct the networks based on expression data of five tissues e.g. bone, breast, colon, kidney and liver in both normal and cancer conditions. MCODE (molecular complex detection) and ModuLand methods have been used to identify the molecular complexes and crucial nodes of the networks respectively. In case of all tissues, cancer PINs show higher level of clustering (formation of molecular complexes) than the normal ones. In contrast, lower level modular overlapping is found in cancer PINs than the normal ones. Thus a proposition can be made regarding the formation of some giant nodes in the cancer networks with very high degree and resulting in reduced overlapping among the network modules though the predicted molecular complex numbers are higher in cancer conditions. The study predicts some major molecular complexes that might act as the important regulators in cancer progression. The crucial nodes identified in this study can be potential drug targets to combat cancer.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Kitano H: Computational systems biology. Nature. 2002, 420: 206-210. Oltvai ZN, Barabasi AL: Life’s complexity pyramid. Science. 2002, 298: 763-764. Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN: Network biology: understanding the cell’s functional organization. Nat Rev Genet. 2004, 5: 101-113. Kininmonth S, van Oppen M, Castine S, et al: The small genetic world of Seriatopora hystrix. Netw Biol. 2012, 2 (1): 1-15. Zhang WJ: How to construct the statistic network? An association network of herbaceous plants constructed from field sampling. Netw Biol. 2012, 2 (2): 57-68. Zhang WJ: Modeling community succession and assembly: A novel method for network evolution. Netw Biol. 2012, 2 (2): 69-78. Ibrahim SS, Eldeeb MAR, Rady MAH, et al: The role of protein interaction domains in the human cancer network. Netw Biol. 2011, 1 (1): 59-71. Newman MEJ: Networks: An Introduction. 2010, UK: Oxford University Press Dormann CF: How to be a specialist? Quantifying specialisation in pollination networks. Netw Biol. 2011, 1 (1): 1-20. Martinez-Antonio A: Escherichia coli transcriptional regulatory network. Netw Biol. 2011, 1 (1): 21-33. Tacutu R, Budovsky A, Yanai H, et al: Immunoregulatory network and cancer-associated genes: Molecular links and relevance to aging. Netw Biol. 2011, 1 (2): 112-120. Zhang WJ: Constructing ecological interaction networks by correlation analysis: hints from community sampling. Netw Biol. 2011, 1 (2): 81-98. Mamun MA, Rahman MS, Islam MF, Honi U, Sobhani ME: Molecular biology and the riddle of cancer: The 'Tom and Jerry’ show. Oncol Rev. 2011, 5 (4): 215(8)- Mirzarezaee M, Araabi BN, Sadeghi M: Comparison of hubs in effective normal and tumor protein interaction networks. Basic Clin Neurosci. 2010, 2 (10): 44-50. Zhou TT: Network systems biology for targeted cancer therapies. Chin J Cancer. 2012, 31 (3): 134-141. Junker BH, Koschutzki D, Schreiber F: Exploration of biological network centralities with CentiBiN. BMC Bioinforma. 2006, 7: 219- Newman MEJ: Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2006, USA, 103: 8577-8582. Fortunato S: Community detection in graphs. Phys Rep. 2010, 486: 75-174. Gavin AC, Aloy P, Grandi P, et al: Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature. 2006, 440: 631-636. Krogan NJ, Cagney G, Yu HY, et al: Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 2006, 440: 637-643. Rahman KMT, Islam MF, Banik RS, Honi U, Diba FS, Sumi SS, Kabir SMT, Akhter MS: Changes in protein interaction networks between normal and cancer conditions: Total chaos or ordered disorder?. Netw Biol. 2013, 3 (1): 15-28. Bader GD, Hogue CWV: An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinforma. 2003, 4 (2): 1-27. Kovacs IA, Palotai R, Szalay-Beko M, Csermely P: Community landscapes: a novel, integrative approach for the determination of overlapping network modules. PLoS ONE. 2010, 7: e12528- Szalay-Beko M, Palotai R, Szappanos B, Kovacs IA, Papp B, Csermely P: ModuLand plug-in for Cytoscape: Determination of hierarchical layers of overlapping network modules and community centrality. Bioinform. 2012, 28 (16): 2202-2204. Zhang Y, Luoh SM, Hon LS, Baertsch R, Wood WI, Zhang Z: GeneHub-GEPIS: digital expression profiling for normal and cancer tissues based on an integrated gene database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35: W152-W158. McDowall MD, Scott MS, Barton GJ: PIPs: Human protein-protein interactions prediction database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37: D651-D656. Scott MS, Barton GJ: Probabilistic prediction and ranking of human protein-protein interactions. BMC Bioinforma. 2007, 8: 239-260. Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Kuhn M, Simonovic M, Roth A, Minguez P, Doerks T, Stark M, Muller J, Bork P, Jensen LJ, von Mering C: The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 39: D561-D568. Jensen LJ, Kuhn M, Stark M, Chaffron S, Creevey C, Muller J, Doerks T, Julien P, Roth A, Simonovic M, Bork P, Von Mering C: STRING 8--a global view on proteins and their functional interactions in 630 organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37: D412-D416. Von Mering C, Jensen LJ, Kuhn M, Chaffron S, Doerks T, Krüger B, Snel B, Bork P: STRING 7--recent developments in the integration and prediction of protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35: D358-D362. Von Mering C, Jensen LJ, Snel B, Hooper SD, Krupp M, Foglierini M, Jouffre N, Huynen MA, Bork P: STRING: known and predicted protein-protein associations, integrated and transferred across organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33: D433-D437. von Mering C, Huynen M, Jaeggi D, Schmidt S, Bork P, Snel B: STRING: a database of predicted functional associations between proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31 (1): 258-261. Snel B, Lehmann G, Bork P, Huynen MA: STRING: a web-server to retrieve and display the repeatedly occurring neighbourhood of a gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28 (18): 3442-3444. Smoot M, Ono K, Ruscheinski J, Wang PL, Ideker T: Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinform. 2011, 27 (3): 431-432. Cline MS, Smoot M, Cerami E, Kuchinsky A, et al: Integration of biological networks and gene expression data using Cytoscape. Nat Protoc. 2007, 2: 2366-2382. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T: Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13 (11): 2498-2504. Gavin AC, Bosche M, Krause R, Grandi P, Marzioch M, Bauer A: Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature. 2002, 415: 141-147. Tong AH, Drees B, Nardelli G, Bader GD, Brannetti B, Castagnoli L: A combined experimental and computational strategy to define protein interaction networks for peptide recognition modules. Science. 2002, 295: 321-324. Jonsson PF, Bates PA: Global topological features of cancer proteins in the human interactome. Bioinform. 2006, 22 (18): 2291-2297. Sun J, Zhao Z: A comparative study of cancer proteins in the human protein-protein interaction network. BMC Genomics. 2010, 11 (Suppl 3): S5- Ding DW: Identification of crucial nodes in biological networks. Netw Biol. 2012, 2 (3): 118-120. Ding DW, Liu T, Lu KZ: Centralization of complex networks: Application to metabolic networks. Comput Appl Chem. 2008, 25: 1508-1510. Ding DW, Li LN: Why giant strong component is so important for metabolic networks?. Rivista di Biologia / Biol Forum. 2009, 102: 12-16. Jonsson PF, Cavanna T, Zicha D, Bates PA: Cluster analysis of networks generated through homology: automatic identification of important protein communities involved in cancer metastasis. BMC Bioinforma. 2006, 7: 2- Hu K, Chen F: Identification of significant pathways in gastric cancer based on protein-protein interaction networks and cluster analysis. Genet Mol Biol. 2012, 35 (3): 701-708.