Comparative Analysis of Translation Systems from Indian Languages to Indian Sign Language

Gurdeep Singh1, Vishal Goyal2, Lalit Goyal3
1Punjabi University;
2Department of Computer Science, Punjabi University, Patiala, India
3Department of Computer Science, DAV College, Jalandhar, India

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ahmed M, Idrees M, ul Abideen Z, Mumtaz R, Khalique S. Deaf talk using 3d animated sign language: a sign language interpreter using microsoft’s kinect v2. In: 2016 SAI Computing Conference (SAI), pp. 330–335. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/SAI.2016.7556002

Bouzid Y, Jemni M. An avatar based approach for automatically interpreting a sign language notation. In: 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp 92–94. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2013.31

Brour M, Benabbou A. Atlaslang mts 1: Arabic text language into arabic sign language machine translation system. Proc Comput Sci. 2019;148:236–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.01.066.

Caballero O, Trujillo-Romero F. 3d modeling of the mexican sign language for a speech-to-sign language system. Comput Sistem 2013;17:593–608. https://doi.org/10.13053/CyS-17-4-2013-011

Dasgupta T, Anupam B. Prototype machine translation system from text-to-indian sign language, pp 313–316. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1145/1378773.1378818

Dhanjal A, Singh W. An automatic conversion of punjabi text to indian sign language. ICST Trans Scalab Inform Syst. 2018;7: 165279. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.13-7-2018.165279.

Fatima S, Agarwal A, Gupta P. Different approaches to convert speech into sign language. In: 2016 3rd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom), pp. 180–183. 2016

Goyal L, Goyal V. Automatic translation of English text to Indian Sign Language synthetic animations. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Natural Language Processing, pp. 144–153. NLP Association of India, Varanasi, India. 2016. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W16-6319

Irving A, Foulds R. A parametric approach to sign language synthesis, pp 212–213. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1145/1090785.1090835

Kar P, Reddy M, Mukerjee A, Raina A. Limited domain formulaic translation from hindi strings to indian sign language. 2006

Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation: Disabled Persons in India A Statistical Profile 2016. 2016. http://mospi.nic.in. [Online; Accessed 19-June2020]

Nair MS, Nimitha AP, Idicula SM.. Conversion of malayalam text to indian sign language using synthetic animation. In: 2016 International Conference on Next Generation Intelligent Systems (ICNGIS), pp. 1–4. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNGIS.2016.7854002

Nasr MM. An enhanced e-learning environment for deaf/hoh pupils. In: 2010 2nd International Conference on Computer Technology and Development, pp 724–727. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCTD.2010.5646421

Piper AM, Hollan J. Supporting medical conversations between deaf and hearing individuals with tabletop displays, pp 147–156. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1145/1460563.1460587

Prasad JB, Patel K. Disability differential in india: a critical evaluation of caste-wise disability. 2013;4: 4–438

Stokoe W. Sign language structure: an outline of the visual communication systems of the american deaf. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2005;10:3–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/eni001.

Tirthankar D, Sambit S, Sandeep K, Synny D, Anupam B. A multilingual multimedia indian sign language dictionary tool. In: Sixth Workshop on Asian Language Resources pp. 11–12. 2008

Verma A, Kaur S. Indian sign language animation generation system for gurumukhi script. Int J Comput Sci Technol [IJCST]. 6. 2015

Vij P, Kumar P. Mapping hindi text to indian sign language with extension using wordnet. pp. 1–5. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1145/2979779.2979817

Worldometers.info: India population 2018 (worldometer). 2018. URL https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/india-population/. [Online; accessed 7-June-2020]

Zeshan U. Indo-pakistani sign language grammar: a typological outline. Sign Lang Stud. 2003;3:157–212. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2003.0005.