Tính So Sánh và Tính Hợp Lệ của Các Phương Pháp Thực Hiện Bài Kiểm Tra Khoảng Khắc Vấn Đề-29 Trực Tuyến và Trực Tiếp

Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (1995). Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. British Medical Journal, 311, 485. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7003.485 American Psychological Association. (2020). Telehealth guidance by state during COVID-19. Retrieved January 30, 2021 from https://www.apaservices.org/practice/clinic/covid-19-telehealth-state-summary Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2020a). MMPI-3 Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2020b). MMPI-3 Technical Manual. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Brearly, T. W., Shura, R. D., Martindale, S. L., Lazowski, R. A., Luxton, D. D., Shenal, B. V., & Rowland, J. A. (2017). Neuropsychological test administration by videoconference: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychology Review, 27(2), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-017-9349-1. Butcher, J.N., Graham, J.R., Ben-Porath, Y.S., Tellegen, A.M., & Dahlstrom, W.G. (2001). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2): Manual for administration and scoring (rev. ed.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press. Carroll, A. (2020). Forensic mental-health assessments after coronavirus disease 2019: Will telehealth lead us to trade psychological depth for convenience? Medicine, Science and the Law, 60(3), 169–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0025802420940618. Chenneville, T., & Schwartz-Mette, R. (2020). Ethical considerations for psychologists in the time of COVID-19. American Psychologist, 75(5), 644–654. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000661 Chuah, et al. (2006). Personality assessment: Does the medium matter? No. Journal of Research in Personality, 40–4, 339–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.01.006 Daniel, M. H., & Wahlstrom, D. (2019). Raw-score equivalence of computer assisted and paper versions of WISC-V. Psychological Services, 16, 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000295 Daniel, M. H., Wahlstrom, D., & Zhang, O. (2014). Equivalence of Q-interactive™ and paper administrations of cognitive tasks: WISC®–V. Q-interactive Technical Report 8. Bloomington, MN: Pearson. Drogin, E. Y. (2020). Forensic mental telehealth assessment (FMTA) in the context of COVID-19. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 71, 101595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101595 Farmer, R. L., McGill, R. J., Dombrowski, S. C., McClain, M. B., Harris, B., Lockwood, A. B., & Stinnett, T. A. (2020). Teleassessment with children and adolescents during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and beyond: Practice and policy implications. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 51(5), 477–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000349 Finger, M. S., & Ones, D. S. (1999). Psychometric equivalence of the computer and booklet forms of the MMPI: A metaanalysis. Psychological Assessment, 11(1), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.11.1.58 Forbey, J. D., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2007). Computerized adaptive personality testing: A review and illustration with the MMPI-2 Computerized Adaptive Version. Psychological Assessment, 19(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.1.14 Gegner, J., Erdodi, L. A., Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Bosi, J., & Brusadelli, E. (2021). An Australian study on feigned mTBI using the Inventory of Problems–29 (IOP-29), its Memory Module (IOP-M), and the Rey Fifteen Item Test (FIT). Applied Neuropsychology:Adult. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2020.1864375 Giromini, L., Barbosa, F., Coga, G., Azeredeo, A., Viglione, D. J., & Zennaro, A. (2020a). Using the inventory of problems–29 (IOP-29) with the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) in symptom validity assessment: A study with a Portuguese sample of experimental feigners. Applied Neuropsychology:Adult, 27(6), 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2019.1570929 Giromini, L., Carfora Lettieri, S., Zizolfi, S., Zizolfi, D., Viglione, D. J., Brusadelli, E., Perfetti, B., di Carlo, D. A., & Zennaro, A. (2019). Beyond rare-symptoms endorsement: a clinical comparison simulation study using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) with the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29). Psychological Injury and Law, 12(3–4), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09357-7 Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Pignolo, C., & Zennaro, A. (2018). A clinical comparison, simulation study testing the validity of SIMS and IOP-29 with an Italian sample. Psychological Injury and Law, 11(4), 340–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-018-9314-1 Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Pignolo, C., & Zennaro, A. (2020b). An Inventory of Problems–29 Sensitivity study investigating feigning of four different symptom presentations via malingering experimental paradigm. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102(4), 563–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2019.1566914 Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Pignolo, C., & Zennaro, A. (2020c). An Inventory of Problems–29 study on random responding using experimental feigners, honest controls, and computer-generated data. Journal of Personality Assessment, 2020, 102(6), 731–742. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2019.1639188 Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Zennaro, A., Maffei, A., & Erdodi, L. A. (2020d). SVT Meets PVT: Development and Initial Validation of the Inventory of Problems – Memory (IOP-M). Psychological Injury and Law, 13(3), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-020-09385-8 Gunel, E., & Dickey, J. (1974). Bayes factors for independence in contingency tables. Biometrika, 61, 545–557. https://doi.org/10.2307/2334738 Ilgunaite, G., Giromini, L., Bosi, J., Viglione, D. J., & Zennaro, A. (2020). A clinical comparison simulation study using the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in Lithuania. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2020.1725518 Jamil, T., Ly, A., Morey, R. D., Love, J., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E. (2017). Default “Gunel and Dickey” Bayes factors for contingency tables. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 638–652. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0739-8 Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Joint Task Force for the Development of Telepsychology Guidelines for Psychologists. (2013). Guidelines for the practice of telepsychology. American Psychologist, 68(9), 791–800. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035001 Kois, L. E., Cox, J., & Peck, A. T. (2020). Forensic E-Mental Health: Review, research priorities, and policy directions. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000293 Larrabee, G. J. (2003). Detection of malingering using atypical performance patterns on standard neuropsychological tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17(3), 410–425. https://doi.org/10.1076/clin.17.3.410.18089 Levy, M. I. (2020). Virtual forensic psychiatric practice: A lawyer’s guide. Forensic psychiatric associates medical corporation. Retrieved January 30, 2021 from https://fpamed.com/virtual-forensic-psychiatric-practice-a-lawyers-guide/ Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Marra, D. E., Hamlet, K. M., Bauer, R. M., & Bowers, D. (2020). Validity of teleneuropsychology for older adults in response to COVID-19: A systematic and critical review. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 34, 1411–1452. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2020.1769192 Menton, W. H., Crighton, A. H., Tarescavage, A. M., Marek, R. J., Hicks, A. D., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2019). Equivalence of laptop and tablet administrations of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form. Assessment, 26(4), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117714558 Merten, T., Merckelbach, H., Giger, P., & Stevens, A. (2016). The Self-Report Symptom Inventory (SRSI): A new instrument for the assessment of distorted symptom endorsement. Psychological Injury and Law, 9, 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-016-9257-3 Miller, H. A. (2001). Miller-Forensic assessment of symptoms test. Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources. Morey, L. (1996). An interpretive guide to the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Morey, L. C. (2007). Personality Assessment Inventory professional manual (2nd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bedirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., & Chertkow, H. (2005). The Montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x Pignolo, C., Giromini, L., Ales, F, & Zennaro, A. (under review). Detection of feigning of different symptom presentations with the PAI and IOP-29. Manuscript submitted for publication. Pinsoneault, T. B. (1996). Equivalency of computer-assisted and paper-and-pencil administered version of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2. Computers in Human Behavior, 12(2), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/0747-5632(96)00008-8 Pizitz, T. D. (2001). Detection of malingered mild head injury using the tripartite conceptual model of malingering and the inventory of problems (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). California School of Professional Psychology. Pliskin, N. H., Puente, A. E., Morgan, J. M., & Gillaspy, S. R. (2020). Neuropsychological and psychological testing during COVID-19. Retrieved January 30, 2021 from https://www.apaservices.org/practice/clinic/covid-19-neuropsychological-psychological-testing Rey, A. (1941). L’examen psychologique dans les cas d’encephalopathie traumatique [Psychological examination in cases of traumatic encephalopathy]. Archives de Psychologie, 28, 286–340. Rogers, R., & Bender, D. (2018). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Rogers, R., Sewell, K. W., & Gillard, N. D. (2010). Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms-2 (SIRS-2) and professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Roma, P., Giromini, L., Burla, F., Ferracuti, S., Viglione, D. J., & Mazza, C. (2020). Ecological validity of the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29): An Italian study of court-ordered, psychological injury evaluations using the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) as criterion variable. Psychological Injury and Law, 13(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09368-4 Roper, B. L., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Butcher, J. N. (1995). Comparability and validity of computerized adaptive testing with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 358–371. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6502_10 Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Speckman, P. L., & Province, J. M. (2012). Default Bayes Factors for ANOVA Designs. Journal of Mathematical Psychology., 56, 356–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2012.08.001 Smith, G. P., & Burger, G. K. (1997). Detection of malingering: Validation of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS). Journal of the American Academy on Psychiatry and Law, 25, 180–183. Tombaugh, T. N. (1996). Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM). New York, USA: Multi Health Systems. van Impelen, A., Merckelbach, H., Jelicic, M., & Merten, T. (2014). The Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS): A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28, 1336–1365. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2014.984763 Viglione, D. J., & Giromini, L. (2020). Inventory of Problems–29: Professional Manual. Columbus, OH: IOP-Test LLC. Viglione, D. J., Giromini, L., & Landis, P. (2017). The Development of the Inventory of Problems–29: A brief self-administered measure for discriminating bona fide from feigned psychiatric and cognitive complaints. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(5), 534–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1233882 Viglione, D. J., Giromini, L., Landis, P., McCullaugh, J. M., Pizitz, T. D., O’Brien, S., Wood, S., Connell, K., & Abramsky, A. (2019). Development and validation of the false disorder score: The focal scale of the inventory of problems. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101(6), 653–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1492413 Widows, M. R., & Smith, G. P. (2005). SIMS-Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology. Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Winters, C. L., Giromini, L., Crawford, T. J., Ales, F., Viglione, D. J., & Warmelink, L. (2020). An Inventory of Problems–29 (IOP–29) study investigating feigned schizophrenia and random responding in a British community sample. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1767720 Wood, S. (2008). Unique contributions of performance and self-report methods in the detection of malingered psychotic symptoms (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). California School of Professional Psychology, San Diego, CA. Wright, A. J. (2018). Equivalence of remote, online administration and traditional, face-to-face administration of the Woodcock-Johnson IV cognitive and achievement tests. Archives of Assessment Psychology, 8(1), 23–35. Wright, A. J., Mihura, J. L., Pade, H., & McCord, D. M. (2020). Guidance on psychological tele-assessment during the COVID-10 crisis. Retrieved January 30, 2021 from https://www.apaservices.org/practice/reimbursement/health-codes/testing/tele-assessment-covid-19 Young, G., Foote, W. E., Kerig, P. K., Mailis, A., Brovko, J., Kohutis, E. A., McCall, S., Hapidou, E. G., Fokas, K. F., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2020). Introducing psychological injury and law. Psychological Injury and Law, 13(4), 452–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-020-09396-5