Community Dynamics in a University Environment

Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences - Tập 7 - Trang 181-203 - 2003
Ray Huffaker1, Ron Mittelhammer1, Paul Barkley1, Raymond Folwell1
1Department of Agricultural Economics, Washington State University, Pullman

Tóm tắt

Scholars have characterized academic communities of faculty, administration, and students in U.S. universities as “organized anarchies.” In contrast, we offer evidence that the community structures of two representative public university systems are notably systematic by applying empirical phase-diagram techniques from the nonlinear dynamics literature to reconstruct low-dimensional deterministic behavior from historic data on the coevolution of faculty, administration, and student populations in each system. Ecological community models, fit with population data for each university, reproduce the essence of this behavior. The models offer novel explanations of how university resources obtained from enrollments and other sources are systematically partitioned among faculty, administration, and student populations interacting in shifting and well-defined community roles. This work offers empirical evidence that ecological principles, typically reserved for characterizing nonhuman interactions in biological systems, can shed light on human interactions in social systems.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Baldridge, J., Curtis, D., Ecker, G., & Riley, G. (1978). Policy making and effective leadership. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

Berryman, A. (1991). Good theories and premature models. American Entomologist, 37, 202-204.

Case, T. (2000). An illustrated guide to theoretical ecology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Coehn, M. and Hall, D. (1974). Leadership and ambiguity. The American college president. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Choi, C.-H. (1997). Generalizations of the Lotka-Volterra population ecology model: Theory, simulation, and application. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 1, 263-273.

Dooley, K. (1997). A complex adaptive systems model of organizational change. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Science, 1, 69-97.

Dooley, K. (1999). Explaining complex organizational dynamics. Organizational Science, 10, 358-372.

Greene, W. (2000). Econometric analysis (4th edition). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Guastello, S. (1995). Chaos, catastrophe, and human affairs. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlabaum Associates.

Hallam, T. (1980). Community dynamics in a homogeneous environment. In T. Hallam & S. Levin (Eds.), Mathematical Biology (Biomathematics, volume 17) (pp. 241-258). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Hastings, A. (1978). Global stability of two species systems. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 5, 399-403.

Kot, M., Schaffer, W., Truty, W., & Graser, G. (1988). Changing criteria for imposing order. Ecological Modelling, 43, 75-110.

McCorkle, C. & Arohibald, S. (1982). Management and leadership in higher education. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

Nonlinear Dynamics Toolbox, Applied Chaos Laboratory, Georgia Tech School of Physics. The software is retrievable from www.physics.gatech.edu/chaos/research/NDT.html.

Paine, R. (1966). Food web complexity and species diversity. American Naturalist, 100, 65-76.

Rothschild, M. & White, L. (1995). The analytics of the pricing of higher education and other services in which the customers are inputs, Journal of Political Economy, 103, 573-586.

Schaffer, W. & Kot, M. (1985). Nearly one dimensional dynamics in an epidemic. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 112, 403-427.

Takens, F. (1980). Detecting strange attractor in turbulence. In D. Rand and L.-S Young (Eds), Dynamics Systems and Turbulance. Lecture Notes in Mathematics (pp. 366-381). New York: Springer.

Williams, G. (1997). Chaos theory tamed. Washington, D.C.: John Henry Press.

Winston, G. (1999). Subsidies, hierarchy and peers: The awkward economics of higher education. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13, 13-36.