Commenting on a commentary?

Arnold, 1998, The limits of postmodernism in accounting history: the decatur experience, Acc. Organ. Society, 23, 665, 10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00021-4 Arrington, 1997, Tightening one’s belt: some questions about accounting, modernity, and the postmodern, Critic. Perspect. Acc., 8, 3, 10.1006/cpac.1996.9999 Bloor D. Knowledge and social imagery. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1976. Bourdieu P. Homo Academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1998. [Collier P, Trans., Homo Academicus; Les Éditions de Minuit, 1984]. Bourdieu P. La Noblesse d’état: les grandes ecoles. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1996. [Claugh LC, The State Nobility, Trans.; Les Éditions de Minuit, 1989]. Burrell G. Linearity, text and death. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Organising in a Multi-voiced World. Leuven, Belgium; 1997. Callon M. Struggles and negotiation to define what is problematic and what is not: the sociology of translation. In: Knorr KD, Krhon R, Whitley R, editors. The social process of scientific investigation. Dordrecht-London: D. Reidel Publishing Company; 1981. Callon M. The sociology of actor-network: the case of an electric vehicle. In: Callon M, Law J, Rip A, editors. Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. Sociology of science in the real word. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1986. Callon M. Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In: Law J, editor. A sociology of monsters: essays on power, technology and domination. London and New York: Routledge; 1991. Callon M, Latour B. Don’t throw the baby with the bath out school! A reply to Collins and Yearly. In: Pickering A, editor. Science as practice and culture. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press; 1992. Callon M, Law J, Rip A, editors. Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. Sociology of science in the real word. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1986. Collins HM, Yearley S. Epistemological chicken. In: Pickering A, editor. Science as practice and culture. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press; 1992. Cooper, 1997, Against postmodernism: class oriented questions for critical accounting, Critic. Perspect. Acc., 8, 15, 10.1006/cpac.1996.0086 Czarniawska B. A narrative approach to organization studies. London: Sage publications; 1998. Czarniawska B. Writing management. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999. Foucault M. The order of things: an archaeology of the human sciences. London: Tavistock Publications; 1970. Froud, 1998, Caterpillar: two stories and an argument, Acc. Organ. Society, 23, 685, 10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00023-8 Gilbert N, Mulkay M. Context of scientific discourse: social accounting in experimental papers. In: Knorr KD, Krhon R, Whitley R, editors. The social process of scientific investigation. Dordrecht-London: D. Reidel Publishing Company; 1981. Hines, 1988, Financial accounting: in communicating reality we construct reality, Acc. Organ. Soc., 13, 251, 10.1016/0361-3682(88)90003-7 Hofstadter DR. Gödel, Escher, Bach: an eternal golden braid. Hassocks: Harvester; 1979. Hoskin, 1994, Boxing clever: for, against and beyond Foucault in the battle for accounting theory, Critic. Perspect. Acc., 5, 57, 10.1006/cpac.1994.1004 Jones, 2002, The ABC bangdown and the juggernaut of modernity, Acc. Organ. Society, 27, 121, 10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00035-6 Knorr KD, Krhon R, Whitley R, editors. The social process of scientific investigation. Dordrecht-London: D. Reidel Publishing Company; 1981. Latour B. Science in action. How to follow scientist and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1987. Latour B. The politics of explanations: an alternative. In: Woolgar S, editor. Knowledge and reflexivity. New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge. London: Sage Publications; 1988. Latour B. We have never been modern. London: Sage publications; 1991a. Latour B. Technology is society made durable. In: Law J, editor. A sociology of monsters: essays on power, technology and domination. London and New York: Routledge; 1991b. Latour B. Pandora’s hope. Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1999. Latour B, Bastide F. Writing science—fact and fiction: the analysis of the process of reality construction through the application of socio-semiotic methods to scientific texts. In: Callon M, Law J, Rip A, editors. Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. Sociology of science in the real word. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1986. Latour B, Woolgar S. Laboratory life: the social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills and London: Sage publications; 1979. Law J. The heterogeneity of texts. In: Callon M, Law J, Rip A, editors. Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. Sociology of science in the real word. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1986. Law J. Heterogeneities. In: Paper presented at the meeting on Uncertainty, Knowledge and Skill, 1977 Nov 6–8, at Limburg University, Diepenbeek, Belgium [co-organised by Organisation Research Group, Limburg University, and the Centre for Social Theory and Technology, Keele University]. http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/sociology/stslaw4.html. Lee, 1999, Organization unbound: actor-network theory, research strategy and institutional flexibility, Organization, 6, 391, 10.1177/135050849963002 McSweeney, 2002, Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: a triumph of faith; a failure of analysis, Human Relat., 55, 89, 10.1177/0018726702055001602 Miller, 1994, Accounting, “Economic Citizenship” and the spatial reordering of manufacture, Acc. Organ. Society, 19, 15, 10.1016/0361-3682(94)90011-6 Miller, 1998, Finding things out, Acc. Organ. Society, 23, 709, 10.1016/S0361-3682(98)00034-8 Neimark, 1990, The king is dead. Long live the king!, Critic. Perspect. Acc., 1, 103, 10.1016/1045-2354(90)01010-3 Neimark, 1994, Regicide revisited: Marx, Foucault and accounting, Critic. Perspect. Acc., 5, 87, 10.1006/cpac.1994.1005 Pickering, A. Science as practice and culture. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press; 1992. Quattrone P. Practices of theorising: placing the production of accounting knowledge in its institutional and social context. The case of the Italian academia. In: Paper presented at the EIASM Workshop on Mapping Diversity in Management Control Theories and Practices in Europe, TMR Euroconference, Palermo, December, 1997. Quattrone, 2000, Constructivism and accounting research: towards a trans-disciplinary perspective, Acc. Aud. Acc. J., 13, 130, 10.1108/09513570010323047 Quattrone, 2001, What does organisational change mean? Speculations on a taken for granted category, Manage. Acc. Res., 12, 404, 10.1006/mare.2001.0176 Rip A. Mobilizing resources through texts. In: Callon M, Law J, Rip A, editors. Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. Sociology of science in the real word. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1986. Rorty R. Consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1982. Sikka P, Willmott H. Practicing critical accounting. Critic Perspect Acc 1997;8(1/2):149–65. Stone, 2001, Accountant’s tales, Acc. Organ. Society, 26, 461, 10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00016-7 Tinker AM, Merino BD, Neimark M. The normative origins of positive theories: ideology and accounting thought. Acc Organ Society 1982;7(2):167–200. Woolgar S. Discovery: logic and sequence in a scientific text. In: Knorr KD, Krhon R, Whitley R, editors. The social process of scientific investigation. Dordrecht-London: D. Reidel Publishing Company; 1981. Woolgar S. Science: the very idea. Sussex: Ellis Horwood; 1988a. Woolgar S, editor. Knowledge and reflexivity. New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge. London: Sage Publications; 1988b. Woolgar S. Reflexivity is the ethnographer of the text. In: Woolgar S, editor. Knowledge and reflexivity. New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge. London: Sage Publications; 1988c. Woolgar S. The turn to technology in social studies of science. Sci Tech Human Values. 1991;16(1):20–50. Woolgar S, Ashmore M. The next step: an introduction to the reflexive project. In: Woolgar S, editor. Knowledge and reflexivity. New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge. London: Sage Publications.