Comment arising from a paper by Wolda and Dennis: using and interpreting the results of tests for density dependence
Tóm tắt
We argue that tests for density dependence are useful in analyses of population dynamics and suggest guide lines for their use and interpretation of results which avoid many of the problems discussed by Wolda and Dennis (1993). Processes other than density dependence per se can cause statistical tests to indicate the presence of density dependence (Wolda and Dennis 1993 and unpublished simulations). Tests for density dependence cannot reveal the mechanism of regulation, but they do indicate the nature of long-term population dynamics. Tests for density dependence give misleading results if sampling is not at generation intervals; however, this problem is avoided if we only use tests on data collected in each generation (Holyoak 1993a). Similarly, species should be semelparous. Non-delayed density dependence should not be considered without looking for delayed density dependence, since the presence of delayed density dependence can lead to over-detection of non-delayed density dependence (Woiwod and Hanski 1992; Holyoak 1993b). The partial autocorrelation function and knowledge of life-history are more useful than tests for density dependence for indicating whether any density dependence is delayed or not (Royama 1992; Holyoak 1993b). Estimation error with a constant upper size limit causes tests for density dependence to overestimate the frequency of delayed density dependence; however we do not know whether estimation error is bounded in real populations. Work in progress suggests that 20–40 generations (depending on the nature of population dynamics) gives a moderate level of accuracy with tests for density dependence, and >40 generations are necessary for tests to be accurate in their assessment of the strength of density dependence. We conclude that tests are useful indicators of whether density dependence, or other feedback mechanisms are likely to be acting.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bulmer MG (1975) The statistical analysis of density dependence. Biometrica 31:901–911
Crowley PH (1992) Density dependence, boundedness and attraction: detecting stability in stochastic systems. Oecologia 90:246–254
Dennis B, Taper M (1993) Density dependence in time series observations of natural populations: estimation and testing. Ecology, in press
Hokyoak M (1993a) Comment: appropriate time scales for identifying density dependent processes. J Anim Ecol, in press
Holuoak M (1993b) Identifying delayed density dependence in time series data. Oikos, in press
Holyoak M (1993c) New insights into testing for density dependence. Oecologia 93:435–444
Itô Y (1972) On the methods for determining density dependence by means of regression. Oecologia 10:347–372
Kuno E (1971) Sampling error as a misleading artefact in key-factor analysis. Res Popul Ecol 13:28–45
Pollard E (1991) Synchrony of population fluctuations: the dominant influence of widespread factors in local butterfly populations. Oikos 60:7–10
Pollard E, Lakhani KH, Rothery P (1987) The detection of density dependence from a series of annual censuses. Ecology 68:2046–2055
Pollard E, Swaay CAM van, Yates TJ (1993) Changes in butterfly numbers in Britain and The Netherlands, 1990–91. Ecol Entomol 18:93–94
Reddingius J (1971) Gambling for existence: a discussion of some theoretical problems in animal population ecology. Acta Biotheor 20 (Suppl): 1–208
Reddingius J (1990) Models for tesing: a secondary note. Oecologia 83:50–52
Reddingius J, Boer PJ den (1989) On the stabilization of animal numbers. Problems of testing. 1. Power estimates and estimation errors. Oecologia 78:1–8
Royama T (1981) Fundamental concepts and methodology for the analysis of animal population dynamics, with particular reference to univoltine species. Ecol Monogr 51:473–493
Royama T (1992) Analytical population dynamics. Chapman and Hall, London
Solow AR (1990) Testing for density dependence, a cautionary note. Oecologia 83:47–49
Solow AR, Steele JH (1990) On sample size, statistical power, and the detection of density dependence. J Anim Ecol 59:1073–1076
Turchin P (1990) Rarity of density dependence or population regulation with lags? Nature 344:660–663
Varley GC, Gradwell GR (1960) Key factors in population studies. J Anim Ecol 29:399–401
Vickery WL (1991) An evaluation of bias in k-factor analysis. Oecologia 85:413–418
Vickery WL, Nudds TD (1984) Detection of density dependent effects in annual duck censuses. Ecology 65:96–104
Woiwod IP, Hanski I (1992) Patterns of density dependence in moths and aphids. J Anim Ecol 61:619–630
Wolda H, Dennis B (1993) Density dependence tests, are they? Oecologia 95:581–591