Collusion and turnover in experience goods markets

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 23 - Trang 91-111 - 2019
Daniel Monte1, Ideen Riahi2, Nikolaus Robalino3
1Sao Paulo School of Economics-FGV, São Paulo, Brazil
2Marxe School of Public and International Affairs, Baruch College, CUNY, New York City, USA
3Department of Economics Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester, USA

Tóm tắt

We study an infinite horizon duopoly with identical long-lived firms and a sequence of short-lived consumers. Consumers are willing to pay more for a higher-quality good, but quality is a noisy function of the firm’s unobserved effort, and it cannot be observed by consumers prior to purchase. We show that a duopoly can overcome this moral hazard problem, and that it can outperform a monopoly in terms of both efficiency and producer surplus. Specifically, we consider collusive N-turnover equilibria, which involve buyers switching firms in perpetuity, i.e., buying from one firm until that firm delivers bad quality N times, and then switching to the other firm. We show (1) that first-best efficiency can be achieved by duopoly in a collusive N-turnover equilibrium, even when monopoly cannot avoid deadweight loss, and (2) that monopoly profit in any equilibrium is strictly dominated by joint duopoly profit in some collusive N-turnover equilibrium.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bar-Isaac H (2005) Imperfect competition and reputational commitment. Econ Lett 89(2):167–173 Bar-Isaac H, Tadelis S (2008) Seller reputation. Found Trends Microecon 4(4):273–351 Chandrasekher M (2015) Unravelling in a repeated principal-agent model with multiple agents. Theor Econ 10(1):11–49 Dana J, Fong Y (2011) Product quality, reputation, and market structure. Int Econ Rev 52(4):1059–1076 Escobar J, Toikka J (2013) Efficiency in games with markovian private information. Econometrica 81(5):1887–1934 Fudenberg D, Levine D (1992) Maintaining a reputation when strategies are imperfectly observed. Rev Econ Stud 59(3):561–579 Gilbert R, Newbery D (1982) Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. Am Econ Rev 72(3):514–526 June Holmstrom B (1999) Managerial incentive problems: a dynamic perspective. Rev Econ Stud 66:169–182 Hörner J (2002) Reputation and competition. Am Econ Rev 92:644–663 Ivaldi M, Jullien B, Rey P, Seabright P, Tirole J (2007) The economics of tacit collusion: implications for merger control. In: Ghosal V, Stennek J (eds) The political economy of antitrust. Elsevier, Amsterdam Klein B, Leffler K (1981) The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance. J Political Econ 89:615–641 Kranton R (2003) Competition and the incentive to produce high quality. Economica 70:385–401 Mailath G, Samuelson L (2001) Who wants a good reputation? Rev Econ Stud 68:415–441 Mailath G, Samuelson L (2006) Repeated games and reputations: long-run relationships?. Oxford University Press, Oxford Matsushima H (2004) Repeated games with private monitoring: two players. Econometrica 72(3):823–852 Radner R (1985) Repeated principal-agent games with discounting. Econometrica 53(5):1173–1186 Reinganum J (1983) Uncertain innovation and the persistence of monopoly. Am Econ Rev 73(4):741–748 Rob R, Sekiguchi T (2006) Reputation and turnover. RAND J Econ 37:341–361 Yi S (1995) Uncertain innovation and persistence of monopoly revisited. Econ Lett Elsevier 49(3):319–322 September