Collaborating with ChatGPT in argumentative writing classrooms

Assessing Writing - Tập 57 - Trang 100752 - 2023
Yanfang Su1, Yun Lin2, Chun Lai3
1Department of Chinese and Bilingual Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
2College of Chinese Language and Culture, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
3Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abrams, 2005, Asynchronous CMC, collaboration and the development of critical thinking in a graduate seminar in applied linguistics, Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/Louisiana Revue canadienne Délelőtt l′apprentissage et Délelőtt Louisiana technologie, 31 Adamopoulou, 2020, Chatbots: History, technology, and applications Anderson, 2023, Visual thinking and argumentative writing: A social-cognitive pairing for student writing development Aull, 2020, From cow paths to conversation: Rethinking the argumentative essay. Pedagogy: Critical approaches to teac, Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, 20, 21, 10.1215/15314200-7878975 Bakhtin, 1986 Berland, 2010, A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts, Science Education, 94, 765, 10.1002/sce.20402 Bitchener, 2016, Vol. 96 Chin, 2010, Students’ questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 883, 10.1002/tea.20385 Coirier, 1999, From planning to translating: The specificity of argumentative writing, 1 Dale, 2021, The automated writing assistance landscape in 2021, Natural Language Engineering, 27, 511, 10.1017/S1351324921000164 Duncan, 2018, Grasp of evidence: Problematizing and expanding the next generation science standards’ conceptualization of evidence, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55, 907, 10.1002/tea.21468 Floridi, 2023, AI as agency without intelligence: On ChatGPT, large language models, and other generative models Fryer, 2019, Chatbot learning partners: Connecting learning experiences, interest and competence, Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 279, 10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.023 Godwin-Jones, 2022, Partnering with AI: Intelligent writing assistance and instructed language learning, Language Learning & Technology, 26, 5 Godwin-Jones, 2021, Big data and language learning: Opportunities and challenges, Language Learning & Technology, 25, 4 Graham, 2013, Writing: Importance, development, and instruction, Reading and Writing, 26, 1, 10.1007/s11145-012-9395-2 Guo, 2022, 100666 Hartwell, 2021, Automated text-matching and writing-assistance tools Hartwell, 2022, Constructs of argumentative writing in assessment tools Herrington, 2012, Writing to a machine is not writing at all, 219 Huang, 2022, Chatbots for language learning—Are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot‐supported language learning, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38, 237, 10.1111/jcal.12610 Hutson, 2021, Robo-writers: The rise and risks of language-generating AI, Nature, 591, 22, 10.1038/d41586-021-00530-0 Kasneci, 2023, ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education Lin, 2020, Enhancing post-secondary writers’ writing skills with a chatbot, Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23, 78 Luo, 2022, A critical review of state‐of‐the‐art chatbot designs and applications Malecka, 2022, Eliciting, processing and enacting feedback: mechanisms for embedding student feedback literacy within the curriculum, Teaching in Higher Education, 27, 908, 10.1080/13562517.2020.1754784 Ngo, 2022, The effectiveness of automated writing evaluation in EFL/ESL writing: a three-level meta-analysis OpenAI. (2023a). ChatGPT (Feb 13 version) [Large language model]. 〈https://chat.openai.com/chat〉. OpenAI. (2023b). ChatGPT (May 3 version) [Large language model]. 〈https://chat.openai.com/chat〉. OpenAI (2023c, March 1). Introducing ChatGPT and Whispers APIs. OpenAI. 〈https://openai.com/blog/introducing-chatgpt-and-whisper-apis〉. OpenAI (2022, November 30). Introducing ChatGPT. OpenAI. 〈https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt〉. Park, 2021, “I wrote as if I were telling a story to someone I knew.”: Designing Chatbot Interactions for Expressive Writing in Mental Health, In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021, 926, 10.1145/3461778.3462143 Ranalli, 2018, Automated written corrective feedback: How well can students make use of it, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31, 653, 10.1080/09588221.2018.1428994 Rudolph, 2023, ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Shi, 2022, Enhancing the use of evidence in argumentative writing through collaborative processing of content-based automated writing evaluation feedback, Language Learning & Technology, 26, 106 Stokel-Walker, 2022, AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays-should academics worry? Su, 2021, 102471 Thorp, 2023, ChatGPT is fun, but not an author, Science, 379, 313-313, 10.1126/science.adg7879 Toulmin, 2003 Vojak, 2011, New spaces and old places: An analysis of writing assessment software, Computers and Composition, 28, 97, 10.1016/j.compcom.2011.04.004 Wagner, 2017, The interplay between student-led discussions and argumentative writing, TESOL Quarterly, 51, 438, 10.1002/tesq.340 Williams, 2019, Technology and writing: Review of research, Computers & Education, 128, 227, 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.024 Xu, 2022, Engaging with multiple sources of feedback in academic writing: postgraduate students’ perspectives Yin, 2020, English as a foreign language learner interaction with chatbots: Negotiation for meaning, International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 7, 390 Zhang, 2020, Engaging with automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback on L2 writing: Student perceptions and revisions, Assessing Writing, 43, 1, 10.1016/j.asw.2019.100439 Zhang, 2021, A commentary of GPT-3 in MIT Technology Review 2021, Fundamental Research, 1, 831, 10.1016/j.fmre.2021.11.011 Zhu, 2001, Performing argumentative writing in English: Difficulties, processes, and strategies, TESL Canada Journal, 19, 34, 10.18806/tesl.v19i1.918