Cognitive Penetration and Predictive Coding: A Commentary on Lupyan

Bitter, D. (unpublished) Distortions in the perceived lightness of faces: a defense of cognitive impenatrablility. Clark, A. 2013. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science”. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 36(3): 181–204. Fodor, J.A. 1983. The modularity of mind: an essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge: Bradford Books, MIT Press. Hohwy, J., A. Roepstorff, and K. Friston. 2008. Predictive coding explains binocular rivalry: an epistemological review. Cognition 108(3): 687–701. Howe, C.Q., and D. Purves. 2005. The Müller-Lyer illusion explained by the statistics of image–source relationships. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102(4): 1234–1239. doi:10.1073/pnas.0409314102. Lupyan G. (this volume) Cognitive penetrability of perception in the age of prediction: Predictive systems are penetrable systems. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. Lupyan, G., and E.J. Ward. 2013. Language can boost otherwise unseen objects into visual awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(35): 14196–14201. Macpherson, F. 2012. Cognitive penetration of colour experience: rethinking the issue in light of an indirect mechanism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84(1): 24–62. Schacter, D.L. 1992. Priming and multiple memory systems: perceptual mechanisms of implicit memory”. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 4(3): 244–256. Swinney, D. 1979. Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of content effects”. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 18(6): 645–659. Shams, L., Y. Kamitani, and S. Shimojo. 2000. What you see is what you hear. Nature 408: 788.