Coexistence of the tiger and the common leopard in a prey‐rich area: the role of prey partitioning

Journal of Zoology - Tập 295 Số 2 - Trang 122-131 - 2015
Sandro Lovari1,2, Chiranjibi Prasad Pokheral3,4, Shant Raj Jnawali5, Leonida Fusani3, Francesco Ferretti1,2
1Department of Life Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
2Ev-K2-CNR Agency, Bergamo, Italy
3Department of Life Sciences and Biotechnology , University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
4National Trust for Nature Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal
5WWF Nepal/Hariyo Ban Program, Kathmandu, Nepal

Tóm tắt

AbstractEcological theory predicts that sympatric species should avoid competition through diet, spatial and/or temporal partitioning. In carnivores, interference is widespread between species with similar diets. Smaller species are expected to differentiate their diet from that of larger, dominant ones, to reduce the risk of potentially lethal encounters. Interference has been reported between tigers and common leopards, with the former dominant over the latter. In 2009–2011, in an area ofTerai,South‐WestNepal, we assessed food habits and prey selection of tigers and common leopards, to evaluate whether prey partitioning occurred between these large cats. Prey availability was high, both in terms of number of species (at least seven wild ungulates beside livestock, two primates and an array of smaller prey) and density (large ungulates, livestock and primates: 130.8–174.8 individuals per km2). Wild vertebrates were the staple of both cats (tigers: 82.7%; common leopards: 66.6%), but common leopards used livestock significantly more than tigers did. Diet breadth of leopards wasc.20% larger than that of tigers, indicating a broader trophic niche. Significant differences in prey use and selection occurred between tigers and leopards, with the former using large (i.e. >100 kg) prey more often and small (i.e. 5–25 kg) prey less often than the latter did. Medium‐sized prey were taken in comparable proportions by the two cats, with a great overlap of diet (Pianka index: 0.85). In conclusion, in our study area, apparently tigers and leopards did not base their coexistence on diet partitioning, suggesting a major role for spatial and/or temporal partitioning.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/j.1469-7998.2007.00310.x

Balson E.W., 1976, General Report on the Suklaphanta Wildlife Reserve

Barlow A.C.D.(2009).The Sundarbans tiger. Adaptation population status and conflict management. PhD thesis University of Minnesota.

10.1515/mamm.1977.41.1.1

10.1007/BF00323544

10.1063/1.3059856

10.1007/978-94-011-1572-8

10.2307/1934144

10.2307/3544421

10.1890/12-0017.1

10.1002/9780470515075

10.2981/0909-6396(2006)12[305:HIKOWA]2.0.CO;2

10.1016/0006-3207(80)90063-4

10.1086/501033

10.1046/j.1365-2656.1998.00202.x

10.1093/beheco/11.6.624

10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00046.x

10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01981.x

10.1890/08-0302.1

10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00565.x

10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00139.x

10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00871.x

10.1007/BF00384581

10.2307/5647

10.1111/j.1469-7998.2000.tb01076.x

Koppikar B.R., 1976, Identification of hairs of some Indian mammals, J. Bomb. Nat. Hist. Soc., 73, 5

Koppikar B.R., 1976, Further studies on the identification of hairs of some Indian mammals, J. Bomb. Nat. Hist. Soc., 74, 50

Kruuk H., 1989, The social badger: ecology and behaviour of a group‐living carnivore Meles meles

10.1007/s10344-010-0473-y

10.1111/j.1469-7998.2007.00356.x

10.1515/9780691209418

10.1046/j.1472-4642.2000.00069.x

10.1111/j.1469-1795.2009.00285.x

10.1111/jzo.12053

10.1080/03949370.2013.806362

Lucherini M., 1995, Seasonal variation in the food habits of badgers in an Alpine valley, Hystrix, 7, 165

10.1371/journal.pone.0088349

10.1111/j.0006-341X.2003.00107.x

Marques F.F.C., 2004, Advanced distance sampling, 31, 10.1093/oso/9780198507833.003.0003

10.1642/0004-8038(2007)124[1229:IEOBDU]2.0.CO;2

10.2307/3803241

McDougal C., 1988, Leopard and tiger interactions at Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal, J. Bomb. Nat. Hist. Soc., 85, 609

10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96252.x

10.1515/mamm.1994.58.1.139

10.2307/3800887

10.56021/9780801857898

10.1111/j.1469-1795.2008.00178.x

10.1016/j.zool.2007.03.003

10.1007/s11284-010-0723-1

10.1086/303189

10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.9020295.x

10.2307/2405010

10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000413

Pokheral C.P.(2013).Ecology and conservation of tiger Panthera tigris and leopard Panthera pardus in a Subtropical lowland area Nepal. PhD thesis University of Ferrara Italy.

10.1007/978-94-009-1517-6

10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00817.x

10.1016/j.biocon.2011.11.005

Schaller G.B., 1967, The deer and the tiger

Schaller G.B., 1972, The Serengeti lion: a study of predator/prey relations

10.1126/science.185.4145.27

10.2307/2989714

10.1016/j.biocon.2012.12.016

10.1086/284969

Subedi H. Shrestha H.K. Karmacharya R.&Yonzon P.(2003).Birds of the Shuklaphanta Wildlife Reserve. Resources Himalaya and Participatory Conservation Program (UNDP) Kathmandu.

Teerink B.J., 1991, Hair of West‐European mammals

Thomas L., 2009, Distance 6.0. release 2

10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01737.x

10.1016/0016-6995(90)80006-2

Turner A., 1997, The big cats and their fossil relatives: an illustrated guide to their evolution and natural history

10.1890/13-0217.1

10.1111/j.1469-7998.2008.00506.x

10.1111/j.1469-1795.2008.00230.x

10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.020