Coevolution of product quality and consumer preferences

Journal of Bioeconomics - Tập 12 - Trang 101-117 - 2010
Takanori Ida1
1Graduate School of Economics, Kyoto University Yoshida, Sakyo, Japan

Tóm tắt

This paper seeks to analyze the self-reinforcing coevolutionary process of innovation on the basis of the framework of evolutionary ecology and population genetics. Particularly central to this analysis is “Fisher’s runaway process,” which explains the coevolution of product quality and consumer preference in the supply–demand context. This paper puts forward the following main points. First, we can conclude from a matching model of supply and demand that when a consumer who prefers high-quality products discovers such a product in the market, he/she will certainly purchase that product. Second, taking into account both the high survival rate of a firm that supplies a high-quality product and the cost incurred by the firm in improving product quality, we arrive at an evolutionarily stable Fisher’s process. The third point, however, considers the disutility of a consumer with an inordinately high quality preference; in this case, Fisher’s process disappears. Fourth, it is possible to recover Fisher’s process if we consider the existence of power users or the effect of the negative bias of innovation.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Andersen B. (2001) Technological change and the evolution of corporate innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham Anderson E. S. (1994) Evolutionary economics: Post-Schumpeterian contributions. Pinter Publishers, London Brock D. C. (eds) (2006) Understanding Moore’s law: Four decades of innovation. Chemical Heritage Press, Philadelphia Bulmer M. G. (1985) The mathematical theory of quantitative genetics. Oxford University Press, Oxford Christensen C. M., Bower J. L. (1996) Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal 17: 197–218 Christensen C. M., Verlinden M., Westerman G. (2002) Disruption, disintegration and the dissipation of differentiability. Industrial Corporate Change 11: 955–993 Dosi G. (2000) Innovation, organization and economic dynamics. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham Falconer D. S. (1981) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, London Fisher R. A. (1915) The evolution of sexual preferences. Eugenics Review 7: 184–192 Hodgson G. M. (1994) Economics and evolution: Bringing life back into economics. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor Iwasa Y., Pomiankowski A., Nee S. (1991) The evolution of costly mate preference II. Evolution 45: 1431–1442 Lande R. (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of Natural Academic Science of the U.S.A. 78: 3721–3725 Mayr E. (1976) Evolution and the diversity of life: Selected essays. Harvard University Press, Boston Metcalfe J. S. (1998) Evolutionary economics and creative destruction. Routledge, New York Nelson R., Winter S. (1984) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Boston Pomiankowski A., Iwasa Y., Nee S. (1991) The evolution of costly mate preference I. Evolution 45: 1422–1430 Rohlfs J. H. (2001) Bandwagon effects in high-technology industries. The MIT Press, Boston Sundbo J. (1998) The theory of innovation: Entrepreneurs, technology and strategy. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham Wadman W. M. (2000) Variable quality in consumer theory: Toward a dynamic microeconomic theory of the consume. M.E. Sharpe Inc, New York Witt U. (1993) Evolutionary economics. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham