Co-production of salient, credible and legitimate environmental knowledge: Cambodia National REDD+ Strategy
Tóm tắt
This paper examines the processes and factors that influence the production of a salient, credible and legitimate Cambodia’s National REDD+ Strategy (NRS). Findings are presented in two parts. First, it empirically reveals that while many working drafts were produced and consulted with more than 1,000 stakeholders from local to international level, finalization of the NRS is still pending as of December 2016. The second part then theoretically explains this empirical finding through concepts in sustainability science, in particular effective boundary work, defined as negotiation processes that happen at the interface between relevant scientists and policy-makers with different views of what constitute salient, credible and legitimate knowledge. This paper makes the central argument that while boundary work does contribute to stakeholders’ perceptions of the Cambodian NRS as salient, credible and legitimate, the effectiveness of this boundary work depends on the combined impacts of contexts and boundary agents. Although contexts for the NRS production are characterized by multiple sources and users of knowledge, this paper found that the former is less significant than the latter. It also found that in highly politicized contexts, boundary work is performed through boundary agents, instead of the formally established institutional arrangements. Boundary agents are defined by their abilities to facilitate communication, translation and mediation of the different political and personal interests that stakeholders bring into the policy process. This paper concludes that the process to develop a salient, credible and legitimate NRS is both a technical and political exercise.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adger WN, Barnett J, Brown K, Marshall N, O’Brien K (2013) Cultural dimensions of climate change impacts and adaptation. Nature Climate Change 3:112–117. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1666
Angelsen A (2010) Policies for reduced deforestation and their impact on agricultural production. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:19639–19644. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912014107
Angelsen A (2012) Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices. CIFOR, Bogor
Bazeley P (2007) Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo. Sage Publications, London
Bebbington AJ (2015) At the Boundaries of La Politica: Political ecology, policy networks and moments of government. In: Perreault T (ed) The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology. Routledge, New York, pp 198–208
Bebbington AJ, Bury J (2009) Institutional challenges for mining and sustainability in Peru. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:17296–17301. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906057106
Berling T, Bueger C (2017) Expertise in the age of post-factual politics: an outline of reflexive strategies. Geoforum 84:332–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.05.008
Bettencourt LM, Kaur J (2011) Evolution and structure of sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:19540–19545. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1102712108
Blom B, Sunderland T, Murdiyarso D (2010) Getting REDD to work locally: lessons learned from integrated conservation and development projects. Environ Sci Pol 2:164–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.01.002
Bryant R (2015) The international handbook of political ecology. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham 10.4337/9780857936172)
Cash DW (2001) In order to aid in diffusing useful and practical information: agricultural extension and boundary organizations. Sci Tech Hum Val 26:431–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390102600403
Cash DW, Clark W, Alcock F, Dickson N, Eckley N, Guston D, Jager J, Mitchell R (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8086–8091. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231332100
Clapp C, Alfsen K, Torvanger A, Lund H (2015) Influence of climate science on financial decisions. Nat Clim Change 5:84–85. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2495
Clark W, Majone G (1985) The Critical Appraisal of Scientific Inquiries with Policy Implications. Sci Tech Hum Val 10:6–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224398501000302
Clark W, Munn R (1986) Sustainable development of the biosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ISBN 978-051323697
Clark W, Tomich T, van Noordwijk M, Dickson N, Catacutan D, Guston D, McNie E (2010) Toward a general theory of boundary work: Insights from the CGIAR’s natural resource management programs. CID Working Paper No. 199. Cambridge, MA, Center for International Development at Harvard University
Clark W, Tomich T, van Noordwijk M, Dickson N, Catacutan D, Guston D, McNie E (2016) Boundary work for sustainable development: Natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 17:4615–4622. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900231108
Clements T (2012) Money for Something? Investigating the effectiveness of biodiversity conservation interventions in the Northern Plains of Cambodia. PhD Thesis. University of Cambridge
Corbera E, Schroeder H (2011) Governing and implementing REDD+. Environ Sci Pol 14:89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.11.002
DeFries R, Ellis E, Chapin F III, Matson P, Turner IIB, Agrawal A, Crutzen P, Field C, Gleick P, Kareiva P, Lambin E, Liverman D, Ostrom E, Sanchez P, Syvitski J (2013) Planetary opportunities: a social contract for global change science to contribute to a sustainable future. Bioscience 62:603–606. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.6.11
Fischer R, Hargita Y, Gunter S (2016) Insights from the Ground Level? A content analysis review of multi-national REDD+ studies since 2010. Forest Pol Econ 66:47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.11.003
Forestry Administration (2007) Forest cover changes in Cambodia, 2002–2006. Paper prepared for the Cambodia Development Cooperation Forum. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Phnom Penh
Forsyth T (2003) Critical political ecology: The Politics of Environmental Science. Routledge, New York
Gibbs H, Brown S, O’Niles J, Foley J (2007) Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: making REDD a reality. Environ Res Let 2:1–13
Gieryn T (1995) Boundaries of science. In: Jasanoff S (ed) Handbook of science and technology studies. Sage Publishing, Thousand Oaks
Guston D (1999) Stabilizing the boundary between US politics and science: the role of the office of technology transfer as a boundary organization. Soc Stu Sci 29:87–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631299029001004
Guston D (2001) Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction. Sci Tech Hum Val 26:399–408
Hackett E (2008) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. MIT Press, Cambridge
Jasanoff S (2004) State of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order. Routledge, London
Jasanoff S, Martello M (2004) Earthly politics: Local and global in environmental governance. MIT Press, Cambridge
Jones N, Jones H, Walsh C (2008) Political Science? Strengthening Science-Policy Dialogue in Developing Countries. Working Paper No. 294, Overseas Development Institute, London
Kanowski P, McDermott C, Cashore B (2011) Implementing REDD+: lessons from analysis of forest governance. Environ Sci Pol 14:111–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.11.007
Kates R, Clark W, Corell R, Hall J, Jaeger C, Lowe I, McCarthy J, Schellnhuber H, Bolin B, Dickson N, Faucheux S, Gallopin G, Grubler A, Huntley B, Jager J, Jogha N, Kasperson R, Mabogunje A, Matson P, Mooney H, Moore III B, O’Riordan, Svedin U (2001). Sustain Sci Sci 292: 641–642. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1059386
King N, Horrocks C (2010) Interviews in qualitative research. Sage Publications, London
Lebel L, Garden P, Luers A, Manuel-Navarrete D Giap DH (2009) Knowledge and innovation relationships in the shrimp industry in Thailand and Mexico. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:4585–4590. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900555106
Lindblom C, Cohen D (1979) Usable knowledge: social science and social problem solving. Yale University Press, New Haven
Liverman D (2004) Who Governs, at What Scale and at What Price? Geography, environmental governance, and the commodification of nature. Annals Asso Amer Geog 94:734–738. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.00428.x
Liverman D (2010) Carbon offsets, the CDM, and sustainable development. In: Schellnhuber H (ed) Global sustainability: a nobel cause. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 129–143
Marion K, Suiseeya M, Caplow S (2013) In pursuit of procedural justice: lessons from an analysis of 56 forest carbon project designs. Glo Environ Cha 23:968–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.013
Mauser W, Klepper G, Rice M, Schmalzbauer B, Hackmann H, Leemans R, Moore H (2013) Transdisciplinary global change research: the co-creation of knowledge for sustainability. Current Op Environ Sust 5:420–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.001
McDermott C, Levn K, Cashore B (2011) Building the forest-climate bandwagon: REDD + and the logic of problem amelioration. Glob Environ Pol 11:85–103 https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00070
McGregor A, Weaver S, Challies E, Howson P, Astuti R, Haalboom B (2014) Practical critique: bridging the gap between critical and practice-oriented REDD+ research communities. Asia Pac Viewp 55:277–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12064
Moss R, Meehl G, Lemos M, Smith J, Arnold J, Arnott J, Behar D, Brasseur G, Broomell S, Busalacchi A, Dessai S, Ebi K, Edmonds J, Furlow J, Goddard L, Hartmann H, Hurrell J, Katzenberger J, Liverman D, Mote P, Moser S, Kumar A, Pulwarty R, Seyller E, Tunrer IIB, Washington W, Wilbanks T (2013) Hell and high water: practice-relevant adaptation science. Science 342:696–698. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239569
Nguon P (2009) Cambodia’s “Carbon Forest” Project Development and Implementation. Unpublished MA Thesis, Monash University, Melbourne
Nguon P (2014) REDD+ feasibility assessment for community protected areas in Cambodia. Ministry of Environment, Phnom Penh
Nguon P, Chhun D (2015) Background Document of the Cambodia’s National REDD+ Strategy. Cambodia REDD+ Taskforce Secretariat, Phnom Penh
Nguon P, Kulakowski D (2013) Natural forest disturbances and the design of REDD + initiatives. Envrion Sci Pol 33:332–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.04.011
Nomura K (2013) Selection Process for REDD+ Consultation Group Representatives in Cambodia. UN-REDD PROGRAMME, Bangkok
Nordhaus W (2007) A review of the stern review on the economics of climate change. J Econ Lit 45:686–702
Pasgaard M, Dawson N, Rasmussen L, Enghoff M, Jensen A (2017) The research and practice of integrating conservation and development by researchers on methodologies, objectives and influence. Glo Eco Cons 9:50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2016.11.006
Perreault T, Bridge K, McCarthy J (2015) The Routledge handbook of political ecology. Routledge, New York
Phelps J, Webb E, Agrawal A (2010) Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance? Science 328:312–313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.118774
Phelps J, Webb E, Adams W (2012) Biodiversity co-benefits of policies to reduce forest-carbon emissions. Nature Climate Change 2:497–503. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1462
REDD+ Taskforce S (2012) Terms of reference for the Cambodia REDD+ Taskforce Secretariat. Phnom Penh
REDD+ Taskforce S (2013) Terms of Reference for REDD+ Consultation Group. Phnom Penh
REDD+ Taskforce S (2014a) Terms of Reference for the REDD+ Gender Group. Phnom Penh
REDD + Taskforce S (2014b) Minutes of the First Meeting of the Four REDD+ Technical Teams. Phnom Penh,
Robbins P (2004) Political ecology: a critical introduction, 1st edn. Blackwell, Malden
Robbins P (2011) Political ecology: a critical introduction, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Malden
Royal Government of Cambodia (2008) Decision 699. Council of Ministers, Phnom Penh
Royal Government of Cambodia (2011) Cambodia UN-REDD National Programme Document. UN-REDD Programme, Phnom Penh
Royal Government of Cambodia (2013) Cambodia: Forest Carbon Partnership Facility REDD + Readiness Project. Phnom Penh
Royal Government of Cambodia (2015) Sub-decree on establishment and functioning of the general secretariat of the National Council for Sustainable Development. Phnom Penh
Salvini G, Herold M, De Sy V, Kissinger G, Brockhaus M, Skutsch M (2014) How countries link REDD+ interventions to drivers in their readiness plans: implications for monitoring systems. Environ Res Let 9:074004
Sikor T (2013) The justices and injustices of ecosystems services. Routledge, New York
Stern P, Ebi K, Leichenko R, Olson R, Steinbruner J, Lempert R (2013) Managing risk with climate vulnerability science. Nat Clim Change 3:607–609. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1929
Turner IIIB., Clark W, Kates R, Richards J, Mathews J, Meyer W (1990) The earth as transformed by human action: global and regional changes in the biosphere over the past 300 years. Cambrdige University Press, Cambridge. ISBN 9780521446303
UNFCCC (2010) Report of the Conference of the Parties on its sixteenth session. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Cancun
UNFCCC (2011) Report of the Conference of the Parties on its seventeenth session. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Durban
UNFCCC (2013) Report of the Conference of the Parties on its nineteenth session. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Warsaw
UNFCCC (2015) Report of the Conference of the Parties on its twenty-first session. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Paris
van Kerkhoff L, Lebel L (2006) Linking Knowledge and Action for Sustainable Development. Ann Rev Environ Res 31:445–477. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.102405.170850
van Noordwijk M, Tomich T, Verbist B (2001) Negotiation support models for integrated natural resource management in tropical forest margins. Conse Eco 5:21
Vatn A, Vedeld P (2013) National governance structures for REDD+. Glo Environ Cha 23:422–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.11.005
World Bank’s FCPF, UNREDD Programme (2012) Guidelines on stakeholder engagement in REDD+ readiness. Geneva