Co-creation between cities and climate change science achieves research and action agenda

#Cities IPCC Bartunek, 2014, Academics and practitioners are alike and unlike: the paradoxes of academic-practitioner relationships, J. Manag., 40, 1181 Beck, 2018, The IPCC and the new map of science and politics, WIRES Clim. Change, 9, 10.1002/wcc.547 Blackstock, 2007, Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability, Ecol. Econ., 60, 726, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.014 Börner, 2010, A multi-level systems perspective for the science of team science, Sci. Transl. Med., 2, 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001399 Bouman, 2020, Engaging city residents in climate action: addressing the personal and group value-base behind residents’ climate actions, Urbanisation, 2455747120965197 C40 Cities Callaghan, 2020, A topography of climate change research, Nat. Clim. Chang., 10, 118, 10.1038/s41558-019-0684-5 Campbell, 2020, Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples, J. Res. Nurs., 25, 652, 10.1177/1744987120927206 Cartwright, 2012, Climate change at the city scale: Impacts Co-Chairs of the Scientific Steering Committee Cockburn, 2016, How to build science-action partnerships for local land-use planning and management: lessons from Durban, South Africa, Ecol. Soc., 21, 10.5751/ES-08109-210128 Colgan, 2021, Asset revaluation and the existential politics of climate change, Int. Organ., 75, 586, 10.1017/S0020818320000296 Davids, 2021, Towards the three dimensions of sustainability for international research team collaboration: learnings from the sustainable and healthy food systems research programme, Sustainability, 13, 12427, 10.3390/su132212427 Devès, 2017, Why the IPCC should evolve in response to the UNFCCC bottom-up strategy adopted in Paris? An opinion from the French Association for Disaster Risk Reduction, Environ. Sci. Pol., 78, 142, 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.001 Doberneck, 2017, Disciplinary variations in publicly engaged scholarship: an analysis using the Biglan classification of academic disciplines, J. Higher Edu. Outreach Engage., 21, 78 Dodman, 2022, Cities, settlements and key infrastructure climate change: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability Future Earth Gordon, 2014, Enhancing communication between conservation biologists and conservation practitioners: letter from the conservation front line, Anim. Conserv., 17, 1, 10.1111/acv.12097 Harris, 2013, Transdisciplinary environmental research: building trust across professional cultures, Environ. Sci. Pol., 31, 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.02.006 Hirsch Hadorn, 2006, Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research, Ecol. Econ., 60, 119, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.002 Howarth, 2017, Enhancing the contribution and role of practitioner knowledge in the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC) working group (WG) II process: Insights from UK workshops, Clim. Serv., 5, 3, 10.1016/j.cliser.2017.04.003 Hughes, 2015, Bourdieu and the IPCC’s symbolic power, Global Environ. Politics, 15, 85, 10.1162/GLEP_a_00323 Hughes, 2017, Narrowing the climate field: the symbolic power of authors in the IPCC’s assessment of mitigation, Rev. Policy Res., 34, 744, 10.1111/ropr.12255 IPCC IPCC, 2018 IPCC, 2022 Jahn, 2012, Transdisciplinarity: between mainstreaming and marginalization, Ecol. Econ., 79, 1, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.017 Jones, 2018, City governments measuring their response to climate change, Reg. Stud. Kates, 2001, Sustainability science, Science, 292, 641, 10.1126/science.1059386 Keane, 2009, Civil society, definitions and approaches, Int. Encyclopedia Civil Soc., 461 Kelly, 2007, Limits to learning for developing a sustainable region: lessons from north-East Queensland, Aust. J. Environ. Manag., 14, 231, 10.1080/14486563.2007.10648721 Klein, 2008, Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: a literature review, Am. J. Prev. Med., 35, S116, 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.010 Klopp, 2017, The urban sustainable development goal: indicators, complexity and the politics of measuring cities, Cities, 63, 92, 10.1016/j.cities.2016.12.019 Knapp, 2019, Placing transdisciplinarity in context: a review of approaches to connect scholars, society and action, Sustainability, 11 Lang, 2012, Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges, Sustain. Sci., 7, 25, 10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x Lwasa, 2022, Urban Systems and other settlements Climate Change 2022: mitigation of climate change Marion, 2016, Informal leadership, interaction, cliques and productive capacity in organizations: a collectivist analysis, Leadersh. Q., 27, 242, 10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.01.003 Morrison-Smith, 2020, Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: a literature review, SN Appl. Sci., 2, 1, 10.1007/s42452-020-2801-5 North, 2022, Science for implementation: The roles, experiences and perceptions of practitioners involved in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change O’Grady, 2021, Glasgow pact leaves 1.5°C goal on life support, Science, 374, 920, 10.1126/science.acx9654 Paterson, 2022, Climate governance antagonisms: policy stability and repoliticization, Global Environ. Politics, 22, 1, 10.1162/glep_a_00647 Plummer, 2022, Transdisciplinary partnerships for sustainability: an evaluation guide, Sustain. Sci., 1 Pohl, 2008, Methodological challenges of transdisciplinary research, Nat. Sci. Soc., 16, 111, 10.1051/nss:2008035 Pohl, 2019, Methods for coproduction of knowledge among diverse disciplines and stakeholders, 115 Polk, 2015, Transdisciplinary co-production: designing and testing a transdisciplinary research framework for societal problem solving, Futures, 65, 110, 10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.001 Posner, 2009, 12 Prieur-Richard Revi, 2014 Roberts, 2016, The new climate Calculus: 1.5°C = Paris agreement, cities, local government, science and champions (PLSC2), Urbanisation, 1, 71, 10.1177/2455747116672474 Romero-Lankao, 2018, Urban transformative potential in a changing climate, Nat. Clim. Chang., 8, 754, 10.1038/s41558-018-0264-0 Schipper, 2022, Climate resilient development pathways climate change 2022: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability Siemens, 2011, The balance between on-line and in-person interactions: methods for the development of digital humanities collaboration, Digital Studies/le Champ Numerique, 2 Solecki, 2021, Accelerating climate research and action in cities through advanced science-policy-practice partnerships, Urban Sust., 1 Stokols, 2003, Evaluating transdisciplinary science, Nicotine Tob. Res., 5, S21, 10.1080/14622200310001625555 Taylor, 2016, Evaluating the outcomes and processes of a research-action partnership: the need for continuous reflective evaluation, Bothalia, 46, 10.4102/abc.v46i2.2154 Tengö, 2021, Solutions-oriented research for sustainability: turning knowledge into action, Ambio. UN-Habitat UN-Habitat, 2018, International conference on climate change and cities United Nations Viner, 2014, Practitioners’ work and evidence in IPCC reports, Nat. Clim. Chang., 4, 848, 10.1038/nclimate2362 Voogt, 2018, CitiesIPCC in Edmonton turns the spotlight on urban areas, Int. Assoc. Urban Clim., 67, 34 Walker, 2006, Grounded theory: an exploration of process and procedure, Qual. Health Res., 16, 547, 10.1177/1049732305285972 Walter, 2007, Measuring societal effects of transdisciplinary research projects: design and application of an evaluation method, Eval. Prog. Plan., 30, 325, 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.08.002