Clinician and Patient Experience of Internet-Mediated Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing Therapy

Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health - Tập 9 Số 3 - Trang 251-262 - 2022
Matthew Bursnall1, Benjamin D. Thomas1, Hannah Berntsson1, Emily Strong, Mark Brayne2, Daniel Hind1
1School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK
21a Havelock Road, Sheringham, NR26 8QD, UK

Tóm tắt

AbstractMany eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapists moved their practice online during COVID-19. We conducted surveys and interviews to understand the implementation and acceptability of online EMDR therapy. From 17 June to 2nd August 2021 an online survey was open to EMDR therapists from the EMDR Association UK & Ireland and EMDR International Association email lists, and, through them, their clients. Questions related to determinants of implementation (for therapists) and acceptability (for clients) of online EMDR. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a sample of therapist respondents to provide a deeper understanding of survey responses. Survey responses were received from therapists (n = 562) from five continents, and their clients (n = 148). 88% of clients responded as being extremely or very comfortable receiving EMDR therapy online. At the initial point of ‘social distancing’, 54% of therapists indicated strong or partial reluctance to deliver online EMDR therapy compared to 11% just over one year later. Four fifths of therapists intended to continue offering online therapy after restrictions were lifted. Free-text responses and interview data showed that deprivation and clinical severity could lead to exclusion from online EMDR. Internet connectivity could disrupt sessions, lead to cancellations, or affect the therapy process. Therapists benefited from training in online working. Online EMDR is generally acceptable to therapists and clients, with reservations about digital exclusion, case severity, poor internet connectivity and the need for training. Further research is needed to confirm that online EMDR is clinically non-inferior to in-person working.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bradley R, Greene J, Russ E, et al. A multidimensional meta-analysis of psychotherapy for PTSD. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:214–27.

Shapiro F. The role of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy in medicine: addressing the psychological and physical symptoms stemming from adverse life experiences. Perm J. 2014;18:71–7.

Békés V, Aafjes-van Doorn K. Psychotherapists’ attitudes toward online therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Psychother Integr. 2020;30:238–47.

Feijt M, de Kort Y, Bongers I, et al. Mental health care goes online: practitioners’ experiences of providing mental health care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2020;23:860–4.

Jeffries FW, Davis P. What is the role of eye movements in eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)? a review. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2013;41:290–300.

Lee CW, Cuijpers P. A meta-analysis of the contribution of eye movements in processing emotional memories. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2013;44:231–9.

De Witte NAJ, Carlbring P, Etzelmueller A, et al. Online consultations in mental healthcare during the COVID-19 outbreak: an international survey study on professionals’ motivations and perceived barriers. Internet Interv. 2021;25:100405.

EMDR Association of Australia Online EMDR Therapy—EMDRAA guidance during Covid-19. 2021. https://www.emdraa.org/wp-content/uploads/newsletter/non-news/EMDRAAGuidanceforOnlineTherapy.pdf. Accessed 15 Sep 2021

Rollins S, Hughes T, Cordes G, et al Guidelines for virtual EMDR therapy: a report of the virtual training and therapy task group presented to the EMDRIA board of Directors, January 18, 2020. https://www.emdria.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Virtual_TG_Report_for_Member.pdf. Accessed 15 Sep 2021.

EMDR Europe Guidelines to practice EMDR Therapy online. In: EMDR Europe. 2021. https://emdrassociation.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Guidelines-EMDR-Therapy-online-Europe.pdf. Accessed 18 Aug 2021

Fisher N. Using EMDR therapy to treat clients remotely. J EMDR Pract Res. 2021;15:73–84.

Spence J, Titov N, Johnston L, et al Internet-delivered eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (iEMDR): an open trial. F1000Res 2013;2:79. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-79.v2

Guest G. How many interviews are enough?: An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18:59–82.

Weller SC, Vickers B, Bernard HR, et al. Open-ended interview questions and saturation. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0198606.

Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444.

Francis JJ, Johnston M, Robertson C, et al. What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health. 2010;25:1229–45.

Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG, editors. Analysing Qualitative Data. Routledge; 1994. p. 173–94.

Atkins L, Francis J, Islam R, et al. A guide to using the theoretical domains framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implement Sci. 2017;12:1–77.

Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:88.

Coleridge ST. Christabel Kubla Khan, a vision the pains of sleep. London: John & Murray; 1816.

Kongsted A, Leboeuf-Yde C. The Nordic back pain subpopulation program: course patterns established through weekly follow-ups in patients treated for low back pain. Chiropr Osteopat. 2010;18:2.

Mayr A, Gefeller O, Prokosch H-U, et al. Web-based data collection yielded an additional response bias—but had no direct effect on outcome scales. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65:970–7.

Stoop I, Verhagen J, van Ingen EP, et al (2007) Increased fieldwork efforts, enhanced response rates, better estimates? In: the challenges of a changing world: proceedings of the fifth international conference of the association for survey computing, University of Southampton, 12–14 September 2007. Association for Survey Computing, Southampton, pp 167–178

Khoshrounejad F, Hamednia M, Mehrjerd A, et al. Telehealth-based services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review of features and challenges. Front Public Health. 2021;9:711762.

Parker RF, Figures EL, Paddison CA, et al. Inequalities in general practice remote consultations: a systematic review. BJGP Open. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0040.

Sezgin E, Huang Y, Lin D, et al. Documented reasons of cancellation and rescheduling of telehealth appointments during the pandemic. Telemed J E Health. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2020.0454.

Ribeiro E, Ferreira Â, Cardoso C, et al. Face-to-face clinical practice under Covid-19 pandemic: how psychotherapists describe their experiences. Front Psychol. 2021;12:726439.

Kadesjö Banck J, Bernhardsson S. Experiences from implementation of internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy for insomnia in psychiatric health care: a qualitative study applying the NASSS framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20:729.

Aronson JK, Barends E, Boruch R, et al. Key concepts for making informed choices. Nature. 2019;572:303–6.

Lenferink LIM, Meyerbröker K, Boelen PA. PTSD treatment in times of COVID-19: A systematic review of the effects of online EMDR. Psychiatry Res. 2020;293:113438.