Clinically significant prostate cancer detection on MRI: A radiomic shape features study
Tài liệu tham khảo
Siegel, 2019, Cancer statistics, 2019, CA. Cancer J. Clin., 69, 7, 10.3322/caac.21551
Loeb, 2014, Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of prostate cancer, Eur. Urol., 65, 1046, 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.062
Bell, 2015, Prevalence of incidental prostate cancer: a systematic review of autopsy studies, Int. J. Cancer, 137, 1749, 10.1002/ijc.29538
Caverly, 2016, Presentation of benefits and harms in US cancer screening and prevention guidelines: systematic review, J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 108, 1, 10.1093/jnci/djv436
Mottet, 2017, EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent, Eur. Urol., 71, 618, 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003
Stark, 2009, Gleason score and lethal prostate cancer: does 3 + 4 = 4 + 3?, J. Clin. Oncol., 27, 3459, 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.4669
Ahmed, 2017, Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study, Lancet, 389, 815, 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1
Barentsz, 2016, Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 guidelines for multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging and recommendations for use, Eur. Urol., 69, 41, 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.038
Schouten, 2017, Why and where do We miss significant prostate cancer with multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging followed by magnetic resonance-guided and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve men?, Eur. Urol., 71, 896, 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.006
Lee, 2018, Combined analysis of biparametric MRI and prostate-specific antigen density: role in the prebiopsy diagnosis of gleason score 7 or Greater prostate cancer, Am. J. Roentgenol., 211, W166, 10.2214/AJR.17.19253
Yanai, 2018, Evaluation of prostate‑specific antigen density in the diagnosis of prostate cancer combined with magnetic resonance imaging before biopsy in men aged 70 years and older with elevated PSA, Mol. Clin. Oncol., 656
Cuocolo, 2018, PSA-density does not improve bi-parametric prostate MR detection of prostate cancer in a biopsy naïve patient population, Eur. J. Radiol., 104, 64, 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.05.004
Donati, 2014, Prostate cancer aggressiveness: assessment with whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient, Radiology, 271, 143, 10.1148/radiol.13130973
Tamada, 2017, Prostate cancer: diffusion-weighted MR imaging for detection and assessment of aggressiveness—comparison between conventional and kurtosis models, Radiology, 284, 100, 10.1148/radiol.2017162321
Gillies, 2016, Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data, Radiology, 278, 563, 10.1148/radiol.2015151169
Khalvati, 2015, Automated prostate cancer detection via comprehensive multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging texture feature models, BMC Med. Imaging, 15, 1, 10.1186/s12880-015-0069-9
Ginsburg, 2015, Novel PCA-VIP scheme for ranking MRI protocols and identifying computer-extracted MRI measurements associated with central gland and peripheral zone prostate tumors, J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 41, 1383, 10.1002/jmri.24676
Litjens, 2016, Computer-extracted features can distinguish noncancerous confounding disease from prostatic adenocarcinoma at multiparametric MR imaging, Radiology, 278, 135, 10.1148/radiol.2015142856
Nketiah, 2017, T2-weighted MRI-derived textural features reflect prostate cancer aggressiveness: preliminary results, Eur. Radiol., 27, 3050, 10.1007/s00330-016-4663-1
Stanzione, 2019, Detection of extraprostatic extension of cancer on biparametric MRI combining texture analysis and machine learning: preliminary results, Acad. Radiol., 1
Lorensen, 1987, Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm, ACM SIGGRAPH Comput. Graph., 10.1145/37402.37422
Krishna, 2019, Diagnosis of transition zone prostate cancer using T2-weighted (T2W) MRI: comparison of subjective features and quantitative shape analysis, Eur. Radiol., 29, 1133, 10.1007/s00330-018-5664-z
Stamey, 1993, Localized prostate cancer. Relationship of tumor volume to clinical significance for treatment of prostate cancer, Cancer, 71, 933, 10.1002/1097-0142(19930201)71:3+<933::AID-CNCR2820711408>3.0.CO;2-L
Yushkevich, 2006, User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability, Neuroimage, 31, 1116, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015
Van Griethuysen, 2017, Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype, Cancer Res., 77, e104, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0339
Hanley, 1983, A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the Same cases, Radiology, 148, 839, 10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708
Choy, 2018, Current applications and future impact of machine learning in radiology, Radiology, 288, 318, 10.1148/radiol.2018171820
Sarkiss, 2019, Machine learning in neuro-oncology: can data analysis from 5346 patients change decision-making paradigms?, World Neurosurg., 124, 287, 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.046
Sollini, 2018, Texture analysis and machine learning to characterize suspected thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: where do we stand?, Eur. J. Radiol., 99, 1, 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.12.004
Romeo, 2018, Characterization of adrenal lesions on unenhanced MRI using texture analysis: a machine-learning approach, J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 48, 198, 10.1002/jmri.25954
Imbriaco, 2018, Does texture analysis of MR images of breast tumors help predict response to treatment?, Radiology, 286, 421, 10.1148/radiol.2017172454
Krishna, 2018, Evaluation of MRI for diagnosis of extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer, J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 47, 176, 10.1002/jmri.25729
Wibmer, 2015, Haralick texture analysis of prostate MRI: utility for differentiating non-cancerous prostate from prostate cancer and differentiating prostate cancers with different gleason scores, Eur. Radiol., 25, 2840, 10.1007/s00330-015-3701-8
Fehr, 2015, Automatic classification of prostate cancer gleason scores from multiparametric magnetic resonance images, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 112, E6265, 10.1073/pnas.1505935112
Kaji, 2018, Diagnostic ability with abbreviated biparametric and full multiparametric prostate MR imaging: Is the use of PI-RADS version 2 appropriate for comparison?, Radiology, 286, 726, 10.1148/radiol.2017172265
Stanzione, 2018, Predicting prognosis with biparametric prostate imaging: one step at a time, Clin. Genitourin. Cancer, 16, e977, 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.04.006
Stanzione, 2018, Biparametric prostate MR imaging protocol: time to revise PI-RADS version 2?, Radiology, 287, 1082, 10.1148/radiol.2018180292
Stanzione, 2016, Biparametric 3T magentic resonance imaging for prostatic cancer detection in a biopsy-naïve patient population: a further improvement of PI-RADS v2?, Eur. J. Radiol., 85, 2269, 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.10.009
Chatterjee, 2015, changes in epithelium, stroma, and lumen space correlate more strongly with gleason pattern and are stronger predictors of prostate ADC changes than cellularity metrics, Radiology, 277, 751, 10.1148/radiol.2015142414
Hoang Dinh, 2016, Quantitative analysis of prostate multiparametric MR images for detection of aggressive prostate cancer in the peripheral zone: a multiple imager study, Radiology, 280, 117, 10.1148/radiol.2016151406
Peng, 2014, Validation of quantitative analysis of multiparametric prostate MR images for prostate cancer detection and aggressiveness assessment: a Cross-imager study, Radiology, 271, 461, 10.1148/radiol.14131320
Bonekamp, 2018, Radiomic machine learning for characterization of prostate lesions with MRI: comparison to ADC values, Radiology, 289, 128, 10.1148/radiol.2018173064