Clinical application of a new hyaluronic acid filler based on its rheological properties and the anatomical site of injection

Biomedical Dermatology - Tập 2 - Trang 1-5 - 2018
Won Lee1, Jeung-Hyun Yoon2, Ik-Soo Koh3, Wook Oh4, Ki-Wook Kim5, Eun-Jung Yang6
1Yonsei E1 Plastic Surgery Clinic, Anyang, South Korea
2Yonseifams Clinic, Seoul, South Korea
3Kohiksoo Plastic Surgery Clinic, Seoul, South Korea
4Samsung Feel Clinic, Seoul, South Korea
5Regen Clinic, Seoul, South Korea
6Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cheil General Hospital and Women’s Healthcare Center, College of Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, Yongin, South Korea

Tóm tắt

Hyaluronic acid (HA) filler is the most commonly used filler for soft tissue augmentation. There are numerous commercially available HA fillers in the cosmetic market, and there are guidelines for each filler as determined by the manufacturing company. The successful use of injectable fillers requires an understanding of each option available so that the most appropriate form of hyaluronic acid may be selected for patients. The purpose of this study was to determine whether newly developed HA fillers are appropriate for forehead augmentation considering their rheological properties and the anatomical site of injection. The rheological properties of new HA fillers were assessed e.t.p.q. S100, S300, S500 (Zetema®). Comparing the rheological properties, the authors chose e.t.p.q. S300® for forehead augmentation. The filler was injected into the foreheads of 40 consecutive patients for esthetic purposes. e.t.p.q. S300® was determined to be an appropriate filler for the forehead. The injection procedure employed was considered to be easy and safe when applied to the preperiosteal layer using a cannula. None of the patients had complications such as vascular compromise, infections, granulomas, or migration. Understanding the physical properties of new fillers is necessary. As the preperiosteal layer of the forehead is an appropriate layer for the filler injection, physicians should consider injecting fillers with enough strength to withstand the shearing forces.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Cong LY, Phothong W, Lee SH, et al. Topographic analysis of the supratrochlear artery and the supraorbital artery: implication for improving the safety of forehead augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:620e–7e. Cotofana S, Mian A, Sykes JM, et al. An update on the anatomy of the forehead compartments. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:864e–72e. Ha RY, Nojima K, Adams WP Jr, Brown SA. Analysis of facial skin thickness: defining the relative thickness index. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:1769–73. Hee CK, Shumate GT, Narurkar V, Bernardin A, Messina DJ. Rheological properties and in vivo performance characteristics of soft tissue fillers. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41(Suppl 1):S373–81. Pierre S, Liew S, Bernardin A. Basics of dermal filler rheology. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41(Suppl 1):S120–6. Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE. The fat compartments of the face: anatomy and clinical implications for cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:2219–27. discussion 2228–2231 van Loghem JAJ, Humzah D, Kerscher M. Cannula versus sharp needle for placement of soft tissue fillers: an observational cadaver study. Aesthet Surg J. 2017;38:73–88.