Clinical and radiographic outcomes of hybrid glenoid fixation with a central porous titanium post: analysis of 713 consecutive shoulders

Barrett, 1987, Total shoulder arthroplasty, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 69, 865, 10.2106/00004623-198769060-00011 Bartels, 2021, Revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty for anatomical glenoid component loosening was not universally successful: a detailed analysis of 127 consecutive shoulders, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 103, 879, 10.2106/JBJS.20.00555 Bercik, 2016, A modification to the Walch classification of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis using three-dimensional imaging, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 25, 1601, 10.1016/j.jse.2016.03.010 Best, 2021, Increasing incidence of primary reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in the United States, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 30, 1159, 10.1016/j.jse.2020.08.010 Budge, 2013, Results of total shoulder arthroplasty with a monoblock porous tantalum glenoid component: a prospective minimum 2-year follow-up study, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 22, 535, 10.1016/j.jse.2012.06.001 Chalmers, 2019, An analysis of costs associated with shoulder arthroplasty, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 28, 1334, 10.1016/j.jse.2018.11.065 Chen, 2019, Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores predict postoperative outcome in total shoulder arthroplasty patients, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 28, 547, 10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.040 Cicchetti, 1994, Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology, Psychol Assess, 6, 284, 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284 Flurin, 2013, Comparison of outcomes using anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013), 71, 101 Fox, 2013, Radiographic survival in total shoulder arthroplasty, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 22, 1221, 10.1016/j.jse.2012.12.034 Friedman, 2019, Clinical and radiographic comparison of a hybrid cage glenoid to a cemented polyethylene glenoid in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 28, 2308, 10.1016/j.jse.2019.04.049 Friedman, 1992, The use of computerized tomography in the measurement of glenoid version, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 74, 1032, 10.2106/00004623-199274070-00009 Griffin, 2014, Patient age is a factor in early outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 23, 1867, 10.1016/j.jse.2014.04.004 Gulotta, 2015, No differences in early results of a hybrid glenoid compared with a pegged implant, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 473, 3918, 10.1007/s11999-015-4558-5 Lazarus, 2002, The radiographic evaluation of keeled and pegged glenoid component insertion, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 84, 1174, 10.2106/00004623-200207000-00013 Malahias, 2020, Total shoulder arthroplasty with hybrid fixation of glenoid components consisting of cementless porous metal pegs or cage along with cemented backside polyethylene surface: a systematic review, Musculoskelet Surg, 104, 229, 10.1007/s12306-020-00670-y Marigi, 2021, Hybrid fixation in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: surgical technique and review of the literature, JSES Rev Rep Tech, 1, 113 Matache, 2017, Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: technical considerations, Open Orthop J, 11, 1115, 10.2174/1874325001711011115 Mejia-Hernandez, 2018, Smartphone applications for the evaluation of pathologic shoulder range of motion and shoulder scores—a comparative study, JSES Open Access, 2, 109, 10.1016/j.jses.2017.10.001 Nelson, 2018, Five-year minimum clinical and radiographic outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty using a hybrid glenoid component with a central porous titanium post, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 27, 1462, 10.1016/j.jse.2018.01.012 Papadonikolakis, 2014, Metal-backed glenoid components have a higher rate of failure and fail by different modes in comparison with all-polyethylene components: a systematic review, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 96, 1041, 10.2106/JBJS.M.00674 Papadonikolakis, 2013, Failure of the glenoid component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of the English-language literature between 2006 and 2012, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 95, 2205, 10.2106/JBJS.L.00552 Parada, 2021, Comparison of complication types and rates associated with anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 30, 811, 10.1016/j.jse.2020.07.028 Rasmussen, 2014, Patient-reported outcome and risk of revision after shoulder replacement for osteoarthritis: 1,209 cases from the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry, 2006–2010, Acta Orthop, 85, 117, 10.3109/17453674.2014.893497 Simovitch, 2018, Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: the substantial clinical benefit, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 27, 903, 10.1016/j.jse.2017.12.014 Simovitch, 2018, Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 27, 298, 10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.013 Smith, 2006, Patient and physician-assessed shoulder function after arthroplasty, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 88, 508 Sperling, 2000, Radiographic assessment of ingrowth total shoulder arthroplasty, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 9, 507, 10.1067/mse.2000.109384 Tammachote, 2009, Long-term results of cemented metal-backed glenoid components for osteoarthritis of the shoulder, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 91, 160, 10.2106/JBJS.F.01613 Throckmorton, 2010, Pegged versus keeled glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 19, 726, 10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.018 Torchia, 1997, Total shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer prosthesis: long-term results, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 6, 495, 10.1016/S1058-2746(97)90081-1 Walch, 2011, Results of a convex-back cemented keeled glenoid component in primary osteoarthritis: multicenter study with a follow-up greater than 5 years, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 20, 385, 10.1016/j.jse.2010.07.011 Yoon, 2021, Articular surface failure of a hybrid anatomic glenoid component: a case report, JBJS Case Connect, 11, e21.00137, 10.2106/JBJS.CC.21.00137