Clinical and etiological analysis of co‐infections and secondary infections in COVID‐19 patients: An observational study

Clinical Respiratory Journal - Tập 15 Số 7 - Trang 815-825 - 2021
Shuyan Chen1, Qing Zhu1, Yanyu Xiao1, Chi Wu1, Zhaofang Jiang1, Lei Liu1, Jiuxin Qu1
1Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Shenzhen, China

Tóm tắt

AbstractBackgroundCo‐infections, secondary bacterial or fungal infections, are important risk factors for poor outcomes in viral infections. The prevalence of co‐infection and secondary infection in patients infected with SARS‐CoV‐2 is not well understood.AimsTo investigate the role of co‐infections and secondary infections in disease severity of hospitalized individuals with COVID‐19.Materials and MethodsA retrospective study was carried out between 11 January 2020 and 1 March 2020 among 408 laboratory confirmed COVID‐19 patients in China. These patients were divided into three groups based on disease severity: mild or moderate, severe, or critically ill. Microbiological pathogens in blood, urine, and respiratory tract specimens were detected by the combination of culture, serology, polymerase chain reaction, and metagenomic next‐generation sequencing (mNGS).ResultsThe median age of participants was 48 years (IQR 34–60 years). Fifty‐two patients (12.7%) had at least one additional pathogen, 8.1% were co‐infected, and 5.1% had a secondary infection. There were 13 Mycoplasma pneumoniae cases, 8 Haemophilus influenzae cases, 8 respiratory viruses, and 3 Streptococcus pneumoniae cases, primarily detected in mild and moderate COVID‐19 patients. Hospital‐acquired infection pathogens were more common in critically ill patients. Compared to those without additional pathogens, patients with co‐infections and/or secondary infections were more likely to receive antibiotics (p < 0.001) and have elevated levels of d‐dimer (p = 0.0012), interleukin‐6 (p = 0.0027), and procalcitonin (p = 0.0002). The performance of conventional culture was comparable with that of mNGS in diagnosis of secondary infections.ConclusionCo‐infections and secondary infections existed in hospitalized COVID‐19 patients and were relevant to the disease severity. Screening of common respiratory pathogens and hospital infection control should be strengthened.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5

World Health Organization.Weekly operational update on COVID‐19 ‐ 30 October 2020. Available at:https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly‐operational‐update‐‐‐30‐october‐2020

10.1001/jama.2020.12839

10.1056/NEJMp2006761

10.3390/jcm9082442

10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30076-X

10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33293-2

10.1001/jama.2012.194139

10.5858/134.2.235

10.1016/j.cmi.2018.06.009

10.1016/j.ijid.2018.03.012

10.1128/mBio.01888-15

10.1093/cid/ciaa489

10.1016/j.ab.2005.01.046

10.1128/JCM.02943-12

10.1371/journal.pone.0110240

10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324

10.1093/cid/ciy693

Guan WJ, 2020, Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China, N Engl J Med, 58, 711

10.1001/jama.2020.1585

10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3

10.1186/s12879-015-0808-0

10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7

10.1016/j.jinf.2020.05.046

10.1016/j.cmi.2020.07.041

10.1016/j.cmi.2020.07.016

10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.10.008

10.1080/22221751.2020.1812437

10.1093/ofid/ofaa220

10.1183/09031936.00169714