Clinical Practice Guidelines in an Era of Accountability, Saudi Arabia: A Call for Action
Tóm tắt
Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) development and implementation in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia are suboptimal. The Kingdom’s Vision 2030 envisages a transformational change to achieve an effective, integrated, value-based ecosystem focused on patient health. This study aimed to develop a CPG appraisal tool that will support the realization of the Kingdom’s Vision 2030 through the development of high-quality and highly implementable CPGs. To maximize its impact, all vital healthcare paradigms, such as systems thinking, value-based healthcare, and information technology, will robustly be incorporated in the tool. The Saudi Health Council through its National Center of Evidence-Based Medicine (NCEBM) embarked on a program to develop this appraisal tool. A taskforce of experts was selected based on their experience in evidence-based practice and training. The task force, through a methodology of extensive literature review, deliberation, outside experts’ feedback, and Delphi and consensus voting, developed a prototype appraisal tool that was named the Holistic Appraisal Tool for CPGs (HAT-CPG). The HAT-CPG was developed comprising three sections: an initial basic information section, an internal validity section, and an external validity section with a total of 13 section items and 73 reporting elements. It is envisaged that the Holistic Appraisal Tool will support CPG developers and users in Saudi Arabia in realizing the objectives for which it was developed.
Tài liệu tham khảo
https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/v2030/vrps/hstp/. Accessed 3 Jan 2022.
Alkhamis A, Hassan A, Cosgrove P. Financing healthcare in Gulf Cooperation Council countries: a focus on Saudi Arabia. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2014;29(1):e64–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2213. (Epub 2013 Aug 28).
Herzallah HK, Antonisamy BR, Shafee MH, Al-Otaibi ST. Temporal trends in the incidence and demographics of cancers, communicable diseases, and non-communicable diseases in Saudi Arabia over the last decade. Saudi Med J. 2019;40(3):277–86. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2019.3.23585.
Al Fraihi KJ, Latif SA. Evaluation of outpatient service quality in Eastern Saudi Arabia Patient’s expectations and perceptions. Saudi Med J. 2016;37(4):420–8. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2016.4.14835.
Al-Momani MM. Gap analysis between perceptions and expectations of medical-surgical patients in a public hospital in Saudi Arabia. Med Princ Pract. 2016;25(1):79–84. https://doi.org/10.1159/000441000. (Epub 2015 Oct 27).
Senitan M, Alhaiti AH, Gillespie J. Patient satisfaction and experience of primary care in Saudi Arabia: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2018;30(10):751–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzy104.
Aidah S, Gillani SW, Alderazi A, Abdulazeez F. Medication error trends in Middle Eastern countries: a systematic review on healthcare services. J Educ Health Promot. 2021;30(10):227. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1549_20. (eCollection 2021).
Al Wahabi S, Farahat F, Bahloul AY. Prevalence and preventability of sentinel events in Saudi Arabia: analysis of reports from 2012 to 2015. East Mediterr Health J. 2017;23(7):492–9. https://doi.org/10.26719/2017.23.7.492. (PMID: 28853133).
Aljadhey H, Mahmoud MA, Ahmed Y, Sultana R, Zouein S, Alshanawani S, Mayet A, Alshaikh MK, Kalagi N, Al Tawil E, El Kinge AR, Arwadi A, Alyahya M, Murray MD, Bates D. Incidence of adverse drug events in public and private hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: the (ADESA) prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(7):e010831. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010831.
Rotenstein LS, Torre M, Ramos MA, Rosales RC, Guille C, Sen S, Mata DA. Prevalence of burnout among physicians: a systematic review. JAMA. 2018;320(11):1131–50. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.12777.
Almannie R, Almuhaideb M, Alyami F, Alkhayyal A, Binsaleh S. The status of medical malpractice litigations in Saudi Arabia: Analysis of the annual report. Saudi J Anaesth. 2021;15(2):97–100. https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_908_20. (Epub 2021 Apr 1).
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines, Graham R, Mancher, M, Miller Wolman D, Greenfield S, Steinberg E (eds) (2011) Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. National Academies Press (US). https://doi.org/10.17226/13058
Brouwers MC, Florez ID, McNair SA, Vella ET, Yao X. Clinical practice guidelines: tools to support high quality patient care. Semin Nucl Med. 2019;49(2):145–52. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2018.11.001. (Epub 2019 Jan 10).
Shaneyfelt TM, Mayo-Smith MF, Rothwangl J. Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature. JAMA. 1999;281(20):1900–5.
Grilli R, Magrini N, Penna A, Mura G, Liberati A. Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for critical appraisal. Lancet. 2000;355:103–6.
Burgers JS, Fervers B, Haugh M, Brouwers M, Browman G, Phillip T, Cluzeau FA. International assessment of the quality of clinical practice guidelines in oncology using the Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation Instrument. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2000–7.
Koornneef E, et al. The development, implementation and evaluation of clinical practice guidelines in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries: a systematic review of literature. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015;21(6):1006–1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12337.
Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, Wu AW, Wilson MH, Abboud PA, Rubin HR. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282(15):1458–65. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.15.1458.
Barth JH, Misra S, Aakre KM, Langlois MR, Watine J, Twomey PJ, Oosterhuis WP. Why are clinical practice guidelines not followed? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016;54(7):1133–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2015-0871.
Siering U, Eikermann M, Hausner E, Hoffmann-Eßer W, Neugebauer EA. Appraisal tools for clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82915.
Vlayen J, Aertgeerts B, Hannes K, Sermeus W, Ramaekers DA. Systematic review of appraisal tools for clinical practice guidelines: multiple similarities and one common deficit. Int J Qual Health Care. 200;17(3):235–242. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzi027.
Hébert C, Watkins-Martin K, Ciquier G, Azzi M, Drapeau M. The quality of six clinical practice guidelines in health and social sciences: are we on the right track? Adm Policy Ment Health. 2021;48(5):821–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-021-01132-8. (Epub 2021 Apr 18).
Eikermann M, Holzmann N, Siering U, Rüther A. Tools for assessing the content of guidelines are needed to enable their effective use–a systematic comparison. BMC Res Notes. 2014;26(7):853. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-853.
Correa VC, Lugo-Agudelo LH, Aguirre-Acevedo DC, Contreras JAP, Borrero AMP, Patiño-Lugo DF, Valencia DAC. Individual, health system, and contextual barriers and facilitators for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines: a systematic metareview. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020;18(1):74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00588-8.
Almazrou SH, Alfaifi SI, Alfaifi SH, Hakami LE, Al-Aqeel SA. Barriers to and Facilitators of Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Middle East and North Africa region: a systematic review. Healthcare (Basel). 2020;8(4):564. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8040564.
Keiffer MR. Utilization of clinical practice guidelines: barriers and facilitators. Nurs Clin North Am. 2015;50(2):327–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnur.2015.03.007.
Correa VC, et al. Individual, health system, and contextual barriers and facilitators for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines: a systematic metareview. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020;18(1):74. Published 2020 Jun 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00588-8.
Grimshaw J, Russell I. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993;342:1317–22.
Grol R. Success and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Med Care. 2001;39(8 Suppl 2):1146–54.
Davis DA, Taylor-Vaisey A. Translating guidelines into practice: a systematic review of theoretic concepts, practice experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ. 1997;157(4):408–16.
Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, Fervers B, Graham ID, Grimshaw J, Hanna SE, Littlejohns P, Makarski J, Zitzelsberger L. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care AGREE Next Steps Consortium. CMAJ. 2010;182(18):E839–42. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.090449. (Epub 2010 Jul 5).
de Vasconcelos LP, Melo DO, Stein AT, de Carvalho HB. Even high-quality CPGs seldom include implementation strategies. Front Pharmacol. 2021;11:593894. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.593894. (eCollection 2020).
Gagliardi AR, Brouwers MC, Bhattacharyya OK. The development of guideline implementation tools: a qualitative study. CMAJ Open. 2015;3(1):E127–33. https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20140064. (eCollection2015Jan-Mar).
Sabharwal S, Patel NK, Gauther S, et al. High methodological quality but poor applicability: assessment of the AAOS guidelines using the AGREE II instrument [published erratum in Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;472:2309]. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:1982–8.
Dobbins M, Hanna SE, Ciliska D, Manske S, Cameron R, Mercer SL, O’Mara L, DeCorby K, Robeson P. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies. Implement Sci. 2009;23(4):61. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-61.
Saha S, Beach C, Cooper L. Patient Centeredness, Cultural Competence, and Healthcare Quality. JNMA. 2008;100(11):1275–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0027-9684(15)31505-4.