Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Ý Nghĩa Lâm Sàng của Tâm Lý Học Phân Tử và Các Dấu Ấn Sinh Học đối với Glioma Ác Tính
Tóm tắt
Glioma ác tính hiện nay được chẩn đoán dựa trên các tiêu chí hình thái và được phân loại theo phân loại của Tổ chức Y tế Thế giới về các khối u não nguyên phát. Thuật toán chẩn đoán và phân loại này cung cấp cho các bác sĩ lâm sàng một dự đoán ước tính về quá trình tự nhiên của bệnh. Nó không phản ánh được phản ứng mong đợi đối với các phương pháp điều trị cụ thể ngoài phẫu thuật (ví dụ: xạ trị hoặc hóa trị liệu alky hóa). Kinh nghiệm lâm sàng đã cho thấy rằng các glioma chia sẻ các tiêu chí mô học tương tự có thể thực sự có các quá trình lâm sàng khác nhau và thể hiện phản ứng rất khác biệt đối với các phương pháp điều trị. Điều này đã được chứng minh một cách ấn tượng đầu tiên đối với oligodendroglioma. Sự hiện diện hoặc thiếu các mất đoạn kết hợp của các đoạn nhiễm sắc thể 1p/19q liên quan đến lợi ích khác nhau từ xạ trị và hóa trị. Chúng tôi xem xét các dấu ấn phân tử hiện tại cho glioma ác tính và thảo luận về tác động hiện tại và tương lai của chúng đối với thần kinh học ung thư lâm sàng.
Từ khóa
#glioma ác tính #chẩn đoán #phân loại #dấu ấn sinh học #điều trịTài liệu tham khảo
Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, et al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 2007;114:97–109.
Batchelor TT, Duda DG, di Tomaso E, et al. Phase II study of cediranib, an oral pan-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2817–23.
Preusser M, Charles Janzer R, Felsberg J, et al. Anti-O6-methylguanine-methyltransferase (MGMT) immunohistochemistry in glioblastoma multiforme: observer variability and lack of association with patient survival impede its use as clinical biomarker. Brain Pathol. 2008;18:520–32.
Sciuscio D, Diserens AC, van Dommelen K, et al. Extent and patterns of MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma- and respective glioblastoma-derived spheres. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:255–66.
Weller M, Stupp R, Reifenberger G, et al. MGMT promoter methylation in malignant gliomas: ready for personalized medicine? Nat Rev Neurol. 2010;6:39–51.
Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:987–96.
Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T, et al. MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:997–1003.
Gilbert MR, Wang M, Aldape KD, et al. RTOG 0525: A randomized phase III trial comparing standard adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) with a dose-dense (dd) schedule in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). ASCO Meeting Abstracts. 2011;29:2006.
• Reifenberger G, Hentschel B, Felsberg J et al. Predictive impact of MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma of the elderly. Int J Canc. Journal international du cancer 2011. This study indicates a predictive role of MGMT methylation in elderly patients with glioblastomas. Currently, the role of MGMT in this glioblastoma patient population is further characterized in randomized clinical trials.
• Felsberg J, Thon N, Eigenbrod S et al. Promoter methylation and expression of MGMT and the DNA mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 in paired primary and recurrent glioblastomas. Int J Canc. Journal international du cancer 2011; 129: 659–670. This study demonstrates that the MGMT status is preserved in recurrent glioblastomas.
McLendon R, Friedman A, Bigner D et al. Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature 2008; 455: 1061–8.
• Yip S, Miao J, Cahill DP et al. MSH6 mutations arise in glioblastomas during temozolomide therapy and mediate temozolomide resistance. Clin Cancer Res. 2009; 15: 4622–9. Overcoming resistance to temozolomide therapy is a critical question. This study defines a role for the mismatch repair gene MSH6.
Wick W, Hartmann C, Engel C, et al. NOA-04 randomized phase III trial of sequential radiochemotherapy of anaplastic glioma with procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine or temozolomide. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5874–80.
van den Bent MJ, Dubbink HJ, Sanson M, et al. MGMT promoter methylation is prognostic but not predictive for outcome to adjuvant PCV chemotherapy in anaplastic oligodendroglial tumors: a report from EORTC Brain Tumor Group Study 26951. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5881–6.
van den Bent MJ, Gravendeel LA, Gorlia T, et al. A hypermethylated phenotype is a better predictor of survival than MGMT methylation in anaplastic oligodendroglial brain tumors: a report from EORTC study 26951. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:7148–55.
Noushmehr H, Weisenberger DJ, Diefes K, et al. Identification of a CpG island methylator phenotype that defines a distinct subgroup of glioma. Cancer Cell. 2010;17:510–22.
Reifenberger J, Reifenberger G, Liu L, et al. Molecular genetic analysis of oligodendroglial tumors shows preferential allelic deletions on 19q and 1p. Am J Pathol. 1994;145:1175–90.
Labussiere M, Idbaih A, Wang XW, et al. All the 1p19q codeleted gliomas are mutated on IDH1 or IDH2. Neurology. 2010;74:1886–90.
Jenkins RB, Blair H, Ballman KV, et al. A t(1;19)(q10;p10) mediates the combined deletions of 1p and 19q and predicts a better prognosis of patients with oligodendroglioma. Cancer Res. 2006;66:9852–61.
Weller M, Felsberg J, Hartmann C, et al. Molecular predictors of progression-free and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a prospective translational study of the German Glioma Network. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5743–50.
Bettegowda C, Agrawal N, Jiao Y, et al. Mutations in CIC and FUBP1 contribute to human oligodendroglioma. Science. 2011;333:1453–5.
Parsons DW, Jones S, Zhang X, et al. An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science. 2008;321:1807–12.
Yan H, Bigner DD, Velculescu V, Parsons DW. Mutant metabolic enzymes are at the origin of gliomas. Cancer Res. 2009;69:9157–9.
Nobusawa S, Watanabe T, Kleihues P, Ohgaki H. IDH1 mutations as molecular signature and predictive factor of secondary glioblastomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:6002–7.
Cairncross G, Berkey B, Shaw E, et al. Phase III trial of chemotherapy plus radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone for pure and mixed anaplastic oligodendroglioma: Intergroup Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 9402. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2707–14.
van den Bent MJ, Carpentier AF, Brandes AA, et al. Adjuvant procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine improves progression-free survival but not overall survival in newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendrogliomas and oligoastrocytomas: a randomized European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2715–22.
Dang L, White DW, Gross S, et al. Cancer-associated IDH1 mutations produce 2-hydroxyglutarate. Nature. 2009;462:739–44.
•• Figueroa ME, Abdel-Wahab O, Lu C et al. Leukemic IDH1 and IDH2 mutations result in a hypermethylation phenotype, disrupt TET2 function, and impair hematopoietic differentiation. Cancer cell 2010; 18: 553–67. This is a very important study demonstrating a connection between metabolics and epigenetics (ie, linking the presence of IDH mutations with hypermethylation).
Prensner JR, Chinnaiyan AM. Metabolism unhinged: IDH mutations in cancer. Nat Med. 2011;17:291–3.
Capper D, Simon M, Langhans CD et al. 2-Hydroxyglutarate concentration in serum from patients with gliomas does not correlate with IDH1/2 mutation status or tumor size. Int J Canc. Journal international du cancer 2011.
Pope WB, Prins RM, Albert Thomas M et al. Non-invasive detection of 2-hydroxyglutarate and other metabolites in IDH1 mutant glioma patients using magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Neuro Oncol 2011.
Capper D, Weissert S, Balss J, et al. Characterization of R132H mutation-specific IDH1 antibody binding in brain tumors. Brain Pathol. 2010;20:245–54.
Hartmann C, Hentschel B, Wick W, et al. Patients with IDH1 wild type anaplastic astrocytomas exhibit worse prognosis than IDH1-mutated glioblastomas, and IDH1 mutation status accounts for the unfavorable prognostic effect of higher age: implications for classification of gliomas. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;120:707–18.
Yan H, Parsons DW, Jin G, et al. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:765–73.
•• Sanson M, Marie Y, Paris S et al. Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 codon 132 mutation is an important prognostic biomarker in gliomas. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 4150–4. This is a very important study indicating that IDH1 codon 132 mutation is closely linked to the genomic profile of the tumor and constitutes an important prognostic marker in gliomas of different WHO grades.
Dubbink HJ, Taal W, van Marion R, et al. IDH1 mutations in low-grade astrocytomas predict survival but not response to temozolomide. Neurology. 2009;73:1792–5.
Taal W, Dubbink HJ, Zonnenberg CB, et al. First-line temozolomide chemotherapy in progressive low-grade astrocytomas after radiotherapy: molecular characteristics in relation to response. Neuro Oncol. 2011;13:235–41.
Hartmann C, Hentschel B, Tatagiba M, et al. Molecular markers in low-grade gliomas: predictive or prognostic? Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:4588–99.
• Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Bady P et al. Pathway analysis of glioblastoma tissue after preoperative treatment with the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib--a phase II trial. Mol Canc Therapeut 2011; 10: 1102–12. Preoperative treatment with targeted therapies enables the assessment of target modulation as demonstrated here for gefitinib.
van den Bent MJ, Brandes AA, Rampling R, et al. Randomized phase II trial of erlotinib versus temozolomide or carmustine in recurrent glioblastoma: EORTC brain tumor group study 26034. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1268–74.
Eisenstat DD, Nabors LB, Mason WP, et al. A phase II study of daily afatinib (BIBW 2992) with or without temozolomide (21/28 days) in the treatment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma. ASCO Meeting Abstracts. 2011;29:2010.
Sampson JH, Heimberger AB, Archer GE, et al. Immunologic escape after prolonged progression-free survival with epidermal growth factor receptor variant III peptide vaccination in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4722–9.
