Clinical Evaluation of Reading Performance Using the Salzburg Reading Desk With a Refractive Rotational Asymmetric Multifocal Intraocular Lens

Journal of Refractive Surgery - Tập 32 Số 8 - Trang 526-532 - 2016
Katharina Linz, Mary S. Attia, Ramin Khoramnia, Tamer Tandogan, F. Kretz, Gerd U. Auffarth

Tóm tắt

PURPOSE: To evaluate functional results and reading performance using the Salzburg Reading Desk after implantation of a sector-shaped near-embedded, rotational asymmetrical multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) and a multifocal toric IOL with a +3.00 diopter (D) near addition. METHODS: In a prospective study, the LentisMplus and Mplus toric IOLs (Oculentis GmbH, Berlin, Germany) were implanted in 34 eyes of 18 patients at the University Eye Hospital of Heidelberg. Uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA) and uncorrected and corrected near visual acuity (UNVA, CNVA) were evaluated using standardized visual acuity charts (ETDRS). The Salzburg Reading Desk was used to analyze unilateral and bilateral uncorrected and corrected reading acuity, reading distance, reading speed, and the smallest log-scaled print size that could be read effectively at a set (40 cm/80 cm) and subjective chosen near and intermediate distance. RESULTS: Postoperatively, the median UDVA was 0.08 logMAR (20/25 Snellen) and the median CDVA was 0.01 logMAR (20/20 Snellen). The median UNVA was 0.12 logMAR (20/25 Snellen) and the median CNVA was 0.03 logMAR (20/20 Snellen). The median uncorrected reading acuity measured with the Salzburg Reading Desk for near distance at 40 cm was 0.18 logMAR (20/32 Snellen). The subjectively preferred near distance was 39 cm and revealed similar visual acuity results. The best reading acuity for intermediate distance with a median of 0.22 logMAR (20/32 Snellen) was achieved at a median distance of 62 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Reading performance of the multifocal IOL corresponded for near standardized and individual distance, whereas reading function was better at the patient's preferred intermediate distance. [ J Refract Surg . 2016;32(8):526–532.]

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1007/s003470170020

10.1007/s003470170172

10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.08.042

10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.08.013

10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.12.002

10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.035

10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.03.035

10.1007/s00347-013-2810-5

10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.055

10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.043

10.3928/1081597X-20091119-01

10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.03.054

10.3928/1081597X-20120215-02

10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.045

10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.08.036

10.3928/1081597X-20120110-01

10.3928/1081597X-20130318-04

10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.05.030

10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.08.013

10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.04.017

10.1007/s00417-002-0443-5

10.1007/s00717-009-0370-5

10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.11.039

10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.07.027

10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.05.022

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Refractive Surgery

Tập 32 Số 8

526-532

Thông tin tác giả