Climatic and Genotypic Effects for Grain Yield in Maize under Stress Conditions

Wiley - Tập 50 Số 1 - Trang 51-58 - 2010
M. Cinta Romay1, Rosa Ana Malvar Pintos1, Laura Campo2, Ángel Carracedo3, Jesús Moreno‐González2, A. Ordás1, Pedro Revilla1
1Misión Biológica de Galicia, CSIC, Apartado 28, 36080 Pontevedra, Spain
2Centro de Investigacións Agrarias de Mabegondo (CIAM) Xunta de Galicia, Apartado 10 15080 A Coruña Spain
3Estación Experimental de Aula Dei, CSIC, Apartado 202, 50080 Zaragoza, Spain

Tóm tắt

ABSTRACTClimate change is expected to affect agriculture. Yield stability across environments is a critical breeding goal when dealing with unstable climate and input reductions in farming systems. The objective of this study was to determine climatic and genetic factors contributing to genotype (G), environment (E), and genotype × environment (GE) variability for maize (Zea mays L.) grain yield under some stress conditions like drought, cold, and pest attack. A large sample of Spanish maize populations was evaluated along with checks at three diverse locations during 3 yr. Factorial regression was performed to obtain a biological explanation of the G, E, and GE interaction for yield. The commercial hybrids had more yield and stability than most populations; therefore, breeding programs focusing on yield have released hybrids with high yield and stability under stress conditions. The populations with a reasonable compromise between yield and stability were Andoain and Lira. The main genotypic covariate was kernel depth, followed by ear length, although other covariates were important for each location. The main climatic covariates for yield were related to days with mean temperature over 15°C and maximum temperature in September, but they were not consistent across locations. Therefore, if yield under stress conditions is a breeding goal, several climatic variables, especially those related to high temperatures, and genotypic traits such as kernel depth and ear length should be considered.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1080/02571862.2004.10635058

Ajibade S.R., 2002, AMMI analysis of genotype‐environment interaction for open‐pollinated maize varieties evaluated in major agro‐ecologies of Nigeria, Trop. Agric., 79, 265

10.1051/agro:19941003

10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.014

Baril C.P., 1995, Analysing genotype by environment interaction in Dutch potato variety trials using factorial regression, Euphytica, 82, 149, 10.1007/BF00027061

10.1111/j.1570-7458.2008.00733.x

10.2135/cropsci2004.7410

Castillo H.D., 2005, Yield potential and stability of germplasm combinations developed among maize groups, Rev. Fitotec. Mex., 28, 135

10.2135/cropsci1999.3951315x

10.1007/s00122-005-0060-x

10.2135/cropsci1977.0011183X001700050016x

Decoux G., 1991, INTERA. Logiciels pour l'interprétation statistique de l'interaction entre deux facteurs

Denis J.B., 1980, Analyse de régression factorielle, Biom. Praxim., 20, 1

10.1080/02331888808802080

10.2135/cropsci1992.0011183X003200050033x

10.2135/cropsci2001.413663x

10.2134/agronj2006.0144

10.1093/jee/84.6.1850

Gomes E., 2000, Yield stability of maize germplasm evaluated in several regions of Brazil, Pesq. Agripec. Bras., 35, 1143

10.2135/cropsci1989.0011183X002900030002x

10.1007/BF00215718

Malvar R.A., 1993, Sources of resistance to pink stem borer and European corn borer in maize, Maydica, 38, 313

10.2135/cropsci2004.0301

10.2134/agronj2007.0058

10.1007/s10681-007-9525-0

Revilla P., 2005, Abiotic stresses: Plant resistance through breeding and molecular approaches

10.2135/cropsci2006.10.0648

Ross A.J., 2006, Genetic analysis of traits correlated with maize ear length, Maydica, 51, 301

10.1016/j.fcr.2007.05.010

10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00024-2

10.1007/s10113-007-0039-z

10.2135/cropsci1999.0011183X003900040002x

Velasco P., 2007, Corn borers (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae; Crambidae) in northwestern Spain: Population dynamics and distribution, Maydica, 52, 195