Climate change and EU foreign policy: The negotiation of burden sharing

International Politics - Tập 46 - Trang 469-490 - 2009
John Vogler1
1SPIRE, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK

Tóm tắt

The European Union has established itself as the leader of attempts to construct a global climate change regime. This has become an important normative stance, part of its self-image and international identity. Yet it has also come to depend on the Union's ability to negotiate internally on the distribution of the burdens necessitated by its external pledges to cut emissions. The paper considers institutionalist hypotheses on cooperative bargaining and normative entrapment in EU internal negotiations before the 1997 Kyoto Protocol negotiations and the more recent approach to negotiations on a post-2012 regime. It finds that there is evidence to support the normative entrapment hypothesis in both cases, but that agreement in 1997 was facilitated by a very favourable context associated with a 1990 baseline.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Andersen, M. and Liefferink, D. (eds.) (1997) European Environmental Policy: The Pioneers. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press. Andersson, M. and Mol, A.P.J. (2002) The Netherlands in the UNFCCC process – Leadership between ambition and reality. International Environmental Agreements 2: 49–68. Bretherton, C. and Vogler, J. (2006) The European Union as a Global Actor. London: Routledge. Cantor, J and Castle, F. (2007) EU wrangling on carbon emissions moves into the courts'. International Herald Tribune, 31 July. Cass, L. (2005) Norm entrapment and preference change: The evolution of the European Union position on international emissions trading. Global Environmental Politics 5 (2): 1–23. Cicero. (2006) The battle over climate policy in the EU, 2006-1. http://www.cicero.uio.no. Costa, O. (2006) Spain as an actor in European and international climate policy: From a passive to an active laggard. South European Society and Politics 11 (2): 223–240. Costa, O. (2008) Is climate change changing the EU? The second image reversed in climate politics. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 21: 4, December: 527–544. Dessai, S. and Michaelowa, A. (2001) Burden sharing and cohesion countries in European climate policy: The Portuguese example. Climate Policy 1: 327–341. European Council. (2005) Presidency Conclusions – Brussels 22/23 March. European Council. (2007) Presidency Conclusions - Brussels 8/9 March. Commission of the European Communities. (1996) Communication from the Commission under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, COM(96) 217 final, 11 June. Commission of the European Communities. (2006) Communication from the Commission to the Council and to the European Parliament on the assessment of national allocation plans for rhe allocation of emission allowances in the second period of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme, Brussels, 29 November, COM(2006)725 final, p. 2. Commission of the European Communities. (2008) Questions and answers on the Commission's proposal for effort sharing, Press Release MEMO/08/34, 23 January. Commission of the European Communities. (2008a) Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to improve and extend the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading system of the Community, COM (2008) 16 final, 23 January. Commission of the European Communities. (2008b) Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the effort of Member States to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to meet the Community's greenhouse gas emission reduction commitments up to 2020. COM (2008) 17 final, 23 January. Commission of the European Communities. (2008c) Questions and answers on the revised EU emissions trading system. MEMO/08/796, Brussels, 17 December. Council of Ministers. (1997) 2033 Environment, 16/10/- Press: 296 Nr:11332/97. Council of Ministers. (2006) Press Release 58, No. 576206, 9 March. Earth Negotiations Bulletin (ENB). (1995) ‘1st CoP FCCC-Summary’. Vol. 12 no. 21. Earth Negotiations Bulletin (ENB). (1996) ‘3rd Session of the AGBM’. Vol. 12 no. 27. Earth Negotiations Bulletin (ENB). (1997) ‘6th Session of the AGBM’- Summary. Vol. 12 no. 45. Earth Negotiations Bulletin (ENB). (2001) ‘CoP 6 bis-Summary’. Vol. 12 no. 176. ENDS Daily. (2006) Italy weakens ministerial climate resolution. 10 March. ENDS Daily. (2006a) Sweden adopts 2020 climate change target. 31 March. ENDS Daily. (2006b) Spain's greenhouse emissions hit new high. 24 April. ENDS Daily. (2006c) Italy returns to the fold on post-Kyoto rules. 8 November. ENDS Daily. (2006d) Council debates post-2012 climate options. 18 December. European Environment Agency. (2007) Annual European Community greenhouse gas inventory 1990–2005 and inventory report 2007, Submission to the UNFCCC Secretariat, EEA technical Report No.7/2006. European Voice. (2008) Deals on climate change economy and Lisbon Treaty. 12 December. Grubb, M. and Yamin, F. (2001) Climate collapse at the Hague. What happened and where do we go from here? International Affairs 77 (2): 261–276. Interview Council Secretariat. (2005) Brussels, 21 September. Interview Council Secretariat. (2006) Brussels, 13 January. Institute of International and European Affairs. (2008) Energy and Climate Change Policy Brief, February. Ringius, L. (1997) Differentiation, Leaders and Fairness: Negotiating Climate Commitments in the European Community. Oslo, Norway: Cicero, Report 1997:8. Schreurs, M.A. and Tiberghien, Y. (2007) Multi-level reinforcement: Explaining European Union leadership in climate change mitigation. Global Environmental Politics 7 (4): 19–46. Stern, N. (2008) Key Elements of a Global Deal on Climate Change. London School of Economics and Political Science. Thomas, D.C. (2009) Explaining the negotiation of EU foreign policy: Normative institutionalism and alternative approaches. International Politics 46 (4): 339–357. Vogler, J. (1999) The European Union as an actor in international environmental politics. Environmental Politics 8 (3): 24–48. Vogler, J. and Bretherton, C. (2006) The European Union as a protagonist to the United States on climate change. International Studies Perspectives 7: 1–22. Zartmann, I.W. (1976) Reality image and detail. In: I.W. Zartmann (ed.) The 50% Solution. Garden City: Doubleday. Walton, R.E. and McKersie, R.B. (1965) A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations: An Analysis of a Social Interaction System. New York: McGraw-Hill. Wettestad, J. (2005) The making of the 2003 EU Emissions Trading Directive: An ultra-quick process due to entrepreneurial proficiency?' Global Environmental Politics 5 (1): 1–23.