Climate‐Science Communication and the Measurement Problem

Political Psychology - Tập 36 Số S1 - Trang 1-43 - 2015
Dan M. Kahan1
1Yale University

Tóm tắt

This article examines the science‐of‐science‐communication measurement problem. In its simplest form, the problem reflects the use of externally invalid measures of the dynamics that generate cultural conflict over risk and other policy‐relevant facts. But at a more fundamental level, the science‐of‐science‐communication measurement problem inheres in the phenomena being measured themselves. The “beliefs” individuals form about a societal risk such as climate change are not of a piece; rather they reflect the distinct clusters of inferences that individuals draw as they engage information for two distinct ends: to gain access to the collective knowledge furnished by science and to enjoy the sense of identity enabled by membership in a community defined by particular cultural commitments. The article shows how appropriately designed “science comprehension” tests—one general and one specific to climate change—can be used to measure individuals’ reasoning proficiency as collective‐knowledge acquirers independently of their reasoning proficiency as cultural‐identity protectors. Doing so reveals that there is in fact little disagreement among culturally diverse citizens on what science knows about climate change. The source of the climate‐change controversy and like disputes over societal risks is the contamination of the science‐communication environment with forms of cultural status competition that make it impossible for diverse citizens to express their reason as both collective‐knowledge acquirers and cultural‐identity protectors at the same time.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1073/pnas.1003187107

10.1146/annurev-polisci-022811-160625

10.1111/j.1464-0597.1993.tb00731.x

Baron J., 2008, Thinking and deciding

10.1093/poq/nfl049

10.1002/tea.3660270503

Bishop G. F., 2005, The illusion of public opinion: Fact and artifact in American public opinion polls

Buckland P., 2014, “Resolved: Climate change is not a ‘crisis’”: Using cultural cognition research in high school ecology class, CCP Blog

California Academy of Sciences. (2014).Anytime lesson plan: Global climate change and sea level rise. Retrieved fromhttp://www.calacademy.org/teachers/resources/lessons/global-climate-change-and-sea-level-rise/

10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808

10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024

10.1007/s10584-012-0424-6

10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195377033.001.0001

10.1002/tea.3660320509

DeVellis R. F., 2012, Scale development: Theory and applications

10.1126/science.31.787.121

10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.x

10.1029/2009EO030002

10.1037/10519-153

Feynman R. P., 1963, The Feynman lectures on physics

10.1257/089533005775196732

Ganzach Y., 2008, On the perception and operationalization of risk perception, Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 317, 10.1017/S1930297500000887

Gliem J. A., 2003, Presented at the Midwest Research‐to‐Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education

10.1175/WCAS-D-11-00044.1

Gore A., 2007, An inconvenient truth: The crisis of global warming

10.1007/s10584-010-9957-8

10.1080/1088937X.2012.684155

Haran U., 2013, The role of actively open‐minded thinking in information acquisition, accuracy and calibration, Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 188, 10.1017/S1930297500005921

IPCC, 2013, Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis, working group in contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change

Kahan D. M., 2007, The cognitively illiberal state, Stanford Law Review, 60, 115

Kahan D.(2011).Industrial strength risk perception measure. CCP Blog. December 31. Retrieved fromhttp://www.culturalcognition.net/blog/2011/12/31/industrial-strength-risk-perception-measure.html

10.1038/488255a

10.1126/science.1245724

10.1017/S1930297500005271

Kahan D. M.(2014a).“Ordinary science intelligence”: A science comprehension measure for use in the study of risk perception and science communication. Cultural Cognition Project Working Paper No. 112.

Kahan D. M., 2014, Culture, politics and climate change, 203

10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00097.x

10.1038/nnano.2008.341

10.1080/13669877.2010.511246

Kahan D. M. Peters E. Dawson E. &Slovic P.(2013).Motivated numeracy and enlightened self‐government. Cultural Cognition Project Working Paper No. 116.

10.1038/nclimate1547

10.1257/000282803322655392

10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00158-X

Koch W., 2013, Americans back greenhouse gas cuts from power plants, USA Today

Kohut A., 2010, Views on climate change: What the polls show, New York Times, A22

10.1093/poq/nft080

Lawson A. E., 2006, Learning about evolution and rejecting a belief in special creation: Effects of reflective reasoning skill, prior knowledge, prior belief and religious commitment, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 143, 10.1002/tea.3660290205

10.1038/nclimate1720

Lichter S. R.(2008).Climate scientists agree on warming disagree on dangers and don't trust the media's coverage of climate change. Statistical Assessment Service George Mason University.

10.1177/0272989X0102100105

10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.10.004

McCright A. M., 2012, Bringing ideology in: The conservative white male effect on worry about environmental problems in the USA, Journal of Risk Research, 16, 1

10.1038/nclimate2443

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2009, Climate literacy: The essential principles of climate science

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2014, Frequently asked questions about the arctic

National Science Foundation, 2006, Science and engineering indicators 2006

National Science Foundation, 2014, Science and engineering indicators

10.1126/science.1103618

Osterlind S. J., 1998, Constructing test items: Multiple‐choice, constructed‐response, performance, and other formats

10.4135/9781412993913

10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01720.x

Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, 2009, Public praises science; scientists fault public, media

Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, 2013, Public's knowledge of science and technology

10.1063/1.3060577

Powell J.(2012).Why climate deniers have no scientific credibility—in one pie chart. Retrieved fromwww.desmogblog.com

10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01448.x

Roos J. M., 2012, Measuring science or religion? A measurement analysis of the National Science Foundation sponsored science literacy scale 2006–2010, Public Understanding of Science

Saad L.(2014 March 18).A steady 57% in U.S. blame humans for global warming. Retrieved fromhttp://www.gallup.com/poll/167972/steady-blame-humans-global-warming.aspx

Schuman H., 1998, Interpreting the poll results better, Public Perspective, 1, 87

10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38004-5

10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.001

Silver D.(2013 June 6).Most Americans say global warming is real but opinions split on why. Pew Research Center. Retrieved fromhttp://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2013/06/06/most-americans-say-global-warming-is-real-but-opinions-split-on-why/

10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x

Stanovich K. E., 2009, What intelligence tests miss: The psychology of rational thought

Stanovich K. E., 2011, Rationality and the reflective mind

Strong K., 2010, Polar puzzle: Will ice melting at the North or South Poles cause sea levels to rise?, Science Buddies

10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.02.001

University of Queensland. (2013).Study shows scientists agree humans cause global‐warming. Retrieved fromhttp://www.uq.edu.au/news/article/2013/05/study-shows-scientists-agree-humans-cause-global-warming

10.2307/256593

Watts D. J., 2011, Everything is obvious: How common sense fails us

10.1007/s10584-006-9060-3

10.1002/bdm.414

10.1037/a0023253

10.1002/bdm.1751

10.1016/0030-5073(82)90248-3

10.1017/CBO9780511818691