Clients’ resistance to therapists’ proposals: Managing epistemic and deontic status

Journal of Pragmatics - Tập 90 - Trang 12-25 - 2015
Katie Ekberg1, Amanda LeCouteur2
1School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
2School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, North Terrace Campus, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia

Tài liệu tham khảo

Antaki, 2012, Affiliative and disaffiliative candidate understandings, Discourse Stud., 14, 531, 10.1177/1461445612454074 Antaki, 2004, Trouble in agreeing on a client's problem in a cognitive-behavioural therapy, Riv. Psicolinguist. Appl., 4, 127 Beck, 1979 Beutler, 2002, Resistance in psychotherapy: what conclusions are supported by research?, J. Clin. Psychol., 58, 207, 10.1002/jclp.1144 Blackburn, 1990 Butler, 2010, Advice implicative interrogatives: Building ‘client centred’ support in a children's helpline, Soc. Psychol. Q., 73, 265, 10.1177/0190272510379838 Clift, 2006, Indexing stance: reported speech as an interactional evidential, J. Sociolinguist., 10, 569, 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00296.x Curl, 2008, Contingency and action: a comparison of two forms of requesting, Res. Lang. Soc. Interact., 41, 129, 10.1080/08351810802028613 Davis, 1986, The process of problem (re)formulation in psychotherapy, Sociol. Health Illn., 8, 44, 10.1111/1467-9566.ep11346469 Edwards, 2006, “To be honest”: sequential uses of honesty phrases in talk-in-interaction, Res. Lang. Soc. Interact., 39, 343, 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3904_1 Ekberg, 2012, Negotiating behavioural change: therapists’ proposal turns in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, Commun. Med., 9, 229, 10.1558/cam.v9i3.229 Ekberg, 2014, Co-implicating and re-shaping clients’ suggestions for behavioural change in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy practice, Qual. Res. Psychol., 11, 60, 10.1080/14780887.2012.709917 Emmison, 2011, Script proposals: a device for empowering clients in counselling, Discourse Stud., 13, 3, 10.1177/1461445610387734 Halliday, 1985 He, 1993, Exploring modality in institutional interactions: cases from academic counselling encounters, Text, 13, 503 Heritage, 1984 Heritage, 2010, Questioning in medicine, 42 Heritage, 2012, The epistemic engine: sequence organization and territories of knowledge, Res. Lang. Soc. Interact., 45, 30, 10.1080/08351813.2012.646685 Heritage, 2013, Action formation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds, Discourse Stud., 15, 551, 10.1177/1461445613501449 Heritage, 2013, Epistemics in conversation, 370 Heritage, 2005, The terms of agreement: indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction, Soc. Psychol. Q., 68, 15, 10.1177/019027250506800103 Heritage, 2010, Navigating epistemic landscapes: acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions Heritage, 1992, Dilemmas of advice: aspects of the delivery and reception of advice in interactions between health visitors and first time mothers, 359 Holt, 1996, Reporting on talk: the use of direct reported speech in conversation, Res. Lang. Soc. Interact., 29, 219, 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_2 Jefferson, 2004, Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction, 13 Jefferson, 1992, The rejection of advice: managing the problematic convergence of a “troubles-telling” and a “service encounter”, 521 Kent, 2012, Compliance, resistance and incipient compliance when responding to directives, Discourse Stud., 14, 711, 10.1177/1461445612457485 Kinnell, 1996, The delivery and receipt of safer sex advice in pretest counselling sessions for HIV and AIDS, J. Contemp. Ethnogr., 24, 405, 10.1177/089124196024004002 Koenig, 2011, Patient resistance as agency in treatment decisions, Soc. Sci. Med., 72, 1105, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.010 Land, 2007, Some uses of third-person reference forms in speaker self-reference, Discourse Stud., 9, 493, 10.1177/1461445607079164 Landmark, 2015, Whose decision? Negotiating epistemic and deontic rights in medical treatment decisions, J. Pragmat., 78, 54, 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.007 Leahy, 2001 Lerner, 2007, Extraction and aggregation in the repair of individual and collective self-reference, Discourse Stud., 9, 526, 10.1177/1461445607079165 Lindström, 2015, Orientations to epistemics and deontics in treatment discussions, J. Pragmat., 78, 39, 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.005 MacMartin, 2008, Resisting optimistic questions in narrative and solution-focused therapies, 80 Madill, 2001, The potential of conversation analysis for psychotherapy research, Couns. Psychol., 29, 413, 10.1177/0011000001293006 Muntigl, 2013, Resistance in couples counselling: sequences of talk that disrupt progressivity and promote disaffiliation, J. Pragmat., 49, 18, 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.01.003 Peräkylä, 2003, Conversation analysis and the professional stocks of interactional knowledge, Discourse Soc., 14, 727, 10.1177/09579265030146003 Peräkylä, 2008 Pilnick, 2008, ‘It's something for you both to think about’: choice and decision making in nuchal translucency screening for Down's syndrome, Sociol. Health Illn., 30, 511, 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01071.x Pomerantz, 1984, Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes, 57 Raymond, 2010, Grammar and social relations: alternative forms of yes/no-type initiating actions in health visitor interactions, 87 Raymond, 2006, The epistemics of social relations: owning grandchildren, Lang. Soc., 35, 677, 10.1017/S0047404506060325 Sacks, 1974, A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation, Language, 50, 696, 10.1353/lan.1974.0010 Safran, 1996, The resolution of ruptures in the therapeutic alliance, J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 64, 447, 10.1037/0022-006X.64.3.447 Silverman, 1997 Simmons, 2011, ‘Hypothetical active-voicing’: therapists ‘modelling’ of clients’ future conversations in CBT interactions, J. Pragmat., 43, 3177, 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.002 Stevanovic, 2012, Establishing joint decisions in a dyad, Discourse Stud., 14, 779, 10.1177/1461445612456654 Stevanovic, 2013, Constructing a proposal as a thought: a way to manage problems in the initiation of joint decision-making in Finnish workplace interaction, J. Pragmat., 23, 519, 10.1075/prag.23.3.07ste Stevanovic, 2012, Deontic authority in interaction: the right to announce, propose, and decide, Res. Lang. Soc. Interact., 45, 297, 10.1080/08351813.2012.699260 Stevanovic, 2014, Three orders in the organization of human action: on the interface between knowledge, power, and emotion in interaction and social relations, Lang. Soc., 43, 185, 10.1017/S0047404514000037 Stivers, 2005, Modified repeats: one method for asserting primary rights from second position, Res. Lang. Social Interact., 38, 131, 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3802_1 Stivers, 2005, Parent resistance to physicians’ treatment recommendations: one resource for initiating a negotiation of the treatment decision, Health Commun., 18, 41, 10.1207/s15327027hc1801_3 Stivers, 2010, An overview of the question–response system in American English conversation, J. Pragmat., 42, 2772, 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.011 Svennevig, 2015, Special issue: epistemics and deontics in conversational directives, J. Pragmat., 78, 1, 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.008 Toerien, 2013, Initiating decision-making in neurology consultations: ‘recommending’ versus ‘option-listing’ and the implications for medical authority, Sociol. Health Illn., 35, 873, 10.1111/1467-9566.12000 Vehviläinen, 2001, Evaluative advice in educational counselling: the use of disagreement in the “stepwise entry” to advice, Res. Lang. Soc. Interact., 34, 371, 10.1207/S15327973RLSI34-3_4 Vehviläinen, 2008, Identifying and managing resistance in psychoanalytic interaction, 120 Waring, 2005, Peer tutoring in a graduate writing centre: indentity, expertise, and advice resisting, Appl. Linguist., 26, 141, 10.1093/applin/amh041 Waring, 2007, Complex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetries, Text Talk, 27, 107, 10.1515/TEXT.2007.005 Weiste, 2015, Describing therapeutic projects across sequences: balancing between supportive and disagreeing interventions, J. Pragmat., 80, 22, 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.02.001 Wright, 2006 Zinken, 2011, How to propose an action as objectively necessary: the case of polish trzeba x (“one needs to x”), Res. Lang. Soc. Interact., 44, 263, 10.1080/08351813.2011.591900