Classification techniques in planning analysis

Rao, 1952, Advanced Statistical Methods for Biometric Research, 71 Tiedman, 1967, The Multiple Discriminant Function: A. Symposium, Harv. Educational Rev., 21 Rulon, 1967 Cooley, 1966 Rettig, 1964, Multiple Discriminant Analysis: An Illustration, Am. Sociological Rev., 29, 398, 10.2307/2091483 Tiedman, 1954, Prediction of College Field of Concentration, Harv. Educational Rev., 24, 122 Jones, 1960, Multiple discriminant analysis applied to “Ways to Live” ratings from six cultural groups, Sociometry, 162, 10.2307/2785680 Cherukupalle, 1969, Multiple Canonical Discriminant Analysis: A Technique of Analysis and Classification Emilio Casetti, Multiple Discriminant Functions, Technical Report No. 12 ONR Task No. 339-135, Contract No. 1128(26), U.S. Office of Naval Research, Bryan, 1954, Prediction of college field of concentration, Harv. Educational Rev., 24, 72 Cherukupalle, 1967 Cassetti, Needless to say, we are not making any judgement regarding the appropriacy of the original treatments in objective or value terms ; only whether and how well the individual concerned fits in or resembles those treatments, and therefore, which one it belongs to. p. 3. Cherukupalle, 1967, Multiple Canonical Discriminant Analysis: A Technique of Analysis and Classification Thompson, 1965, 21 Cassetti, This contention was verified in the author's dissertation cited above and it was one of the most useful features of the technique that is Shubert, 1965 Cooley, 1962 Cooley, 1962, 122 Cherukupalle, 1961, Multivariate Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences Jones, 1961 Tiedman, 1954, Prediction of College Field of Concentration, Harv. Educational Rev., 24, 122 Rao, 1952, Advanced Statistical Methods for Biometric Research, 252 Cherukupalle, 1967, Multiple Canonical Discriminant Analysis: A Technique of Analysis and Classification Nirmala Devi Cherukupalle, It should be pointed out that interpretation of factors in factor analysis in conceptually meaningful terms is often bese Cooley, 1962 Rao, 1952, Advanced Statistical Methods for Biometric Research, 354 Cherukupalle, 1967, Multiple Canonical Discriminant Analysis: A Technique of Analysis and Classification Cherukupalle, 1969, Multiple Canonical Discriminant Analysis: A Technique of Analysis and Classification Cooley, 1966 Rulon, 1967 This judgement can be made by looking at the actual values of probabilities associated with different group memberships. If none of these probabilities is high enough the classification and membership criteria would be suspicious or invalid. Cooley and Lohnes, Programme RSPACE. Kaiser, 1968, Predicting the behavior of predevelopment landowners on the urban fringe, J. Am. Instit. Planners, 328, 10.1080/01944366808977552 Cooley, 1968, Predicting the behavior of predevelopment landowners on the urban fringe, J. Am. Instit. Planners, 142 Cooley, 1968, Predicting the behavior of predevelopment landowners on the urban fringe, J. Am. Instit. Planners, 142