Class II treatment by extraction of maxillary first molars or Herbst appliance: dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects in comparison

Al-Nimri KS (2006) Vertical changes in class II division 1 malocclusion after premolar extractions. Angle Orthod 76:52–58 Anderson BD (1975) Multiple extraction patterns in severe discrepancy cases. Angle Orthod 45:291–303 Basciftci FA, Usumez S (2003) Effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on class I and class II subjects. Angle Orthod 73:36–42 Basdra EK, Stellzig A, Komposch G (1996) Extraction of maxillary second molars in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod 66:287–292 Bishara SE, Cummins DM, Zaher AR (1997) Treatment and posttreatment changes in patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion after extraction and nonextraction treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 111:18–27 Bishara SE, Cummins DM, Jakobsen JR (1995) The morphologic basis for the extraction decision in Class II, division 1 malocclusions: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 107:129–135 Bishara SE (1998) Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class II division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113:661–673 Bishara SE, Zaher AR, Cummins DM et al (1994) Effects of orthodontic treatment on the growth of individuals with Class II division 1 malocclusion. Angle Orthod 64:221–230 Bock N, Pancherz H (2006) Herbst treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in retrognathic and prognathic facial types. Angle Orthod 76:930–941 Bokas J, Collett T (2006) Effect of upper premolar extractions on the position of the upper lip. Aust Orthod J 22:31–37 Booij JW, Goeke J, Bronkhorst EM et al (2011) Overjet correction and space closure mechanisms for Class II treatment by extracting the maxillary first molars. J Orofac Orthop 72:196–203 Booij JW, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Katsaros C (2009) A treatment method for Class II division 1 patients with extraction of permanent maxillary first molars. World J Orthod 10:41–48 Bravo LA, Canut JA, Pascual A et al (1997) Comparison of the changes in facial profile after orthodontic treatment, with and without extractions. Br J Orthod 24:25–34 Cudovic B (1998) Orthodontic treatment of a Class II, 1 malocclusion including extractions of the 4 first molars. J Orofac Orthop 59:186–191 Darendeliler N, Taner L (2006) Changes in the soft tissue profile after extraction orthodontic therapy. J Dent Child 73:164–169 Erdinc AE, Nanda RS, Dandajena TC (2007) Profile changes of patients treated with and without premolar extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132:324–331 Flores-Mir C, Major MP (2006) Soft tissue changes with fixed functional appliances in Class II division 1. Angle Orthod 76:712–720 Goeke J (2009) Dentale und skelettofaziale Veränderungen zweier Therapieformen der Klasse II/1. Begg-technik versus Herbst-Behandlung. Eine röntgenkephalometrische Untersuchung. Med Diss (Giessen) Katsaros C, Ripplinger B, Hoegel A et al (1996) The influence of extraction versus nonextraction orthodontic treatment on the soft tissue profile. J Orofac Orthop 57:354–365 Katsaros C (1996) Profile changes following extraction vs. nonextraction orthodontic treatment in a pair of identical twins. J Orofac Orthop 57:56–59 Lo FD, Hunter WS (1982) Changes in nasolabial angle related to maxillary incisor retraction. Am J Orthod 82:384–391 Looi LK, Mills JR (1986) The effect of two contrasting forms of orthodontic treatment on the facial profile. Am J Orthod 89:507–517 Luppanapornlarp S, Johnston LE Jr (1993) The effects of premolar-extraction: a long-term comparison of outcomes in “clear-cut” extraction and nonextraction Class II patients. Angle Orthod 63:257–272 Nelson B, Hägg U, Hansen K, Bendeus M (2007) A long-term follow-up study of Class II malocclusion correction after treatment with Class II elastics or fixed functional appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132:499–503 Nelson B, Hansen K, Hägg U (2000) Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118:142–149 O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F et al (2003) Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124:128–137 Pancherz H, Ruf S (2008) The Herbst-appliance. Research-based clinical management. Quintessence, Berlin Pancherz H (1982) The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. Am J Orthod 82:104–113 Pancherz H (1979) Treatment of class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 76:423–442 Pancherz H, Anehus-Pancherz M (1994) Facial profile changes during and after Herbst appliance treatment. Eur J Orthod 16:275–286 Paquette DE, Beattie JR, Johnston LE (1992) A longterm comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in “borderline” Class II patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 102:1–14 Peterson JE, McNamara JA (2003) Temporomandibular joint adaptations associated with Herbst appliance treatment in juvenile Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Sem Orthod 9:12–25 Ricketts RM (1960) The influence of orthodontic treatment on facial growth and development. Angle Orthod 30:103–133 Ruf S, Pancherz H (1999) Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes in young adults treated with the Herbst appliance. Angle Orthod 69:239–246 Ruf S, Pancherz H (1998) Temporomandibular joint growth adaptation in Herbst treatment. A prospective MRI and cephalometric roentgenographic study. Eur J Orthod 20:375–388 Ruf S, Pancherz H (1999) Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes in young adults treated with the Herbst appliance. Angle Orthod 69:239–246 Ruf S, Pancherz H (1999) Temporomandibular joint remodeling in adolescents and young adults during Herbst treatment: a prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric radiographic investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 115:607–618 Ruf S, Pancherz H (1996) The effect of Herbst appliance treatment on the mandibular plane angle: a cephalometric roentgenographic study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 110:225–229 Sandler PJ, Atkinson R, Murray AM (2000) For four sixes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 117:418–434 Schaefer AT, McNamara JA Jr, Franchi L et al (2004) A cephalometric comparison of treatment with the Twin-block and stainless steel crown Herbst appliances followed by fixed appliance therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126:7–15 Skidmore KJ, Brook KJ, Thomson WM et al (2006) Factors influencing treatment time in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129:230–238 Stalpers MJ, Booij JW, Bronkhorst EM et al (2007) Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132:316–323 Vig PS, Weintraub JA, Brown C et al (1990) The duration of orthodontic treatment with and without extractions: a pilot study of five selected practices. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 97:45–51 Weichbrodt L, Ingervall B (1992) Treatment of Class II, div. 1 malocclusion with the activator and with the Begg technique. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 102:1037–1045 Williams R (1979) Single arch extraction—upper first molars or what to do when nonextraction treatment fails. Am J Orthod 76:376–393