Khoa học công dân thổi hồn vào nghiên cứu nông nghiệp tham gia. Một bài tổng hợp

Abah OS et al (2011) How wide are the ripples? From local participation to international organisational learning. 63. London, United Kingdom Abrol D, Gupta A (2014) Understanding the diffusion modes of grassroots innovations in India: a study of honey bee network supported innovators. African J Sci Technol Innov Dev 6(6):541–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2014.976974 Aker JC (2010) ‘Dial a for agriculture: using information and communication Technologies for Agricultural Extension in developing countries’, in Conference Agriculture for Development-Revisited, University of California at Berkeley, October, pp. 1–2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2011.00545.x Anderson JR, Feder G (2004) Agricultural extension: good intentions and hard realities. World Bank Res Obs 19(1):41–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkhO13 Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. Reprint from JAIP 35(4):216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225 Ashby JA (1996) What do we mean by participatory research in agriculture? In: New Frontiers in Participatory Research and Gender Analysis. An International Seminar on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis for Technology Development. CIAT, Cali, Columbia, p 280 Cali, pp. 15–22 Ballard HL, Dixon CGH, Harris EM (2017) Youth-focused citizen science: examining the role of environmental science learning and agency for conservation. Biological Conservation. The Authors 208:65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.024 Barnaud C, van Paassen A (2013) Equity, power games, and legitimacy: dilemmas of participatory natural resource management. Ecol Soc 18(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05459-180221 Barreteau O et al (2003) Our companion modelling approach. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 6(2) Available at: http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/2/1.html Becker T (2000) Participatory research in the CGIAR. In: Tropentag D (ed) Session: international agricultural research: methods. Strategies and Institutions, Hohenheim, pp 1–16 Bela G et al (2016) Learning and the transformative potential of citizen science. Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology 30(5):990–999. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12762 Bell S et al (2008) What counts? Volunteers and their organisations in the recording and monitoring of biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 17(14):3443–3454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9357-9 Bentley JW (1989) ‘What farmers don’ t know can’t help them: the strengths and weaknesses of indigenous technical knowledge in Honduras’, Agriculture and human values, Summer, pp. 25–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02217666 Bentley JW (1994) Facts, fantasies, and failures of farmer participatory research. Agric Hum Values 11(2–3):140–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01530454 Berthet ETA et al (2016) How to foster agroecological innovations? A comparison of participatory design methods. J Environ Plan Manag 59(2):280–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2015.1009627 Berthet ET, Hickey GM, Klerkx L (2018) Opening design and innovation processes in agriculture: insights from design and management sciences and future directions. Agric Syst 165(June):111–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.06.004 Beza E et al (2017) What are the prospects for citizen science in agriculture? Evidence from three continents on motivation and mobile telephone use of resource-poor farmers. Plos One 12(5):e0175700. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175700 Beza E et al (2018) Exploring farmers’ intentions to adopt mobile Short Message Service (SMS) for citizen science in agriculture. Comput Electron Agric 151(June):295–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.06.015 Biggs S (1989) ‘Resource-poor farmer participation in research: a synthesis of experiences from national agricultural research systems’, OFCOR - Comparative Study Paper No. 3, p. 37 Biggs S (2008) The lost 1990s? Personal reflections on a history of participatory technology development. Dev Pract 18(4–5):489–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520802181228 Blaney R et al (2016) ‘Citizen Science and Environmental Monitoring : Towards a Methodology for Evaluating Opportunities , Costs and Benefits Final Report on behalf of UK Environmental Observation Framework by ’:, Citizen Science and Environmental Monitoring-Final Report, (Final Report), p. 77 Bonney R et al (2014) Citizen science: next steps for citizen science. Science:1436–1437. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251554 Bonney R et al (2016) Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Underst Sci 25(1):2–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515607406 Brossard D, Lewenstein B, Bonney R (2005) Scientific knowledge and attitude change: the impact of a citizen science project. Int J Sci Educ 27(9):1099–1121. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500069483 Bunch R (1982) Two ears of corn: a guide to people-Centred agricultural improvement. World Neighbours, Oklahoma City Caroll JM (2017) Human-computer interaction - brief history. In: The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 3rd edn. Interaction Design Foundation, pp 21–62 Ceccarelli S (2015) Efficiency of plant breeding. Crop Science 55(1):87. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2014.02.0158 Ceccarelli S, Grando S (2007) Decentralized-participatory plant breeding: an example of demand driven research. Euphytica 155(3):349–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-006-9336-8 Chambers R (1994) The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Dev 22(7):953–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-4 Chambers R, Jiggins J (1987) Agricultural research for resource-poor farmers part I: transfer-of-technology and farming systems research. Agric Adm Ext 27(1):35–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7475(87)90008-0 Chowdhury, A. et al. (2015) ‘Enhancing farmers’ capacity for botanical pesticide innovation through video-mediated learning in Bangladesh’, Int J Agric Sustain. Taylor & Francis, 13(4), pp. 1–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2014.997461 Clary EG et al (1998) Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: a functional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 74(6):1516–1530 Collinson M (2000) A history of farming systems research. Edited by M Collinson, FAO and CABI Cooke M (2000) Five arguments for deliberative democracy. Political Studies 48(5):947–969. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00289 Cooper CB, Lewenstein BV (2016) Two meanings of citizen science. In: The Rightful Place of Science: Citizen Science, 1st edn, pp 51–62 Cooper CB et al (2007) Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecol Soc 12(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02197-120211 Cooper CB, Bailey RL, Leech DI (2015) The role of citizen science in studies of avian reproduction. In: Reynolds DCD, S. J (eds) Nests, Eggs, and Incubation: New ideas about avian reproduction. Oxford University Press, pp 208–220. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198718666.003.0017 Cornwall A (2008) Unpacking “participation” models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal 43(3):269–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsn010 Cornwall A, Jewkes R (1995) What is participatory research? Soc sci Med 41(12):1667–1676 doi: citeulike-article-id:6707894 Crall A et al (2011) Assessing citizen science data quality: an invasive species case study. Conserv Lett 4(6):433–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00196.x Crowston, K. and Fagnot, I. (2008) ‘The motivational arc of massive virtual collaboration’, Proceedings of the IFIP WG 9.5 Working Conference on Virtuality and Society: Massive Virtual Communities, (July), pp. 1–2. 10.1.1.193.7977 Dehnen-Schmutz K et al (2016) Exploring the role of smartphone technology for citizen science in agriculture, Agronomy for Sustainable Development. Agron Sustain Dev 36(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0359-9 Dickel S, Franzen M (2016) The “problem of extension” revisited: new modes of digital participation in science. J Sci Commun 15(1):1–15 Dickinson JL et al (2012) The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Front Ecol Environ 10(6):291–297 Douthwaite B, Hoffecker E (2017) ‘towards a complexity-aware theory of change for participatory research programs working within agricultural innovation systems’. Agric Syst 155:88–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.04.002 Douthwaite B et al (2017) A new professionalism for agricultural research for development. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2017.1314754 Drinkwater LE, Friedman D, Buck L (2016) Innovative solutions to complex challenges. This publication is distributed by SARE Outreach Available at: http://www.sare.org/Learning-Center/Books/Systems-Research-for-Agriculture ECSA (2020) ECSA’s characteriscs of citzen science. Eur Citizen Sci Assoc:1–6. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787352339 Edelson DC, Kirn SL, Workshop Participants (2018) Designing citizen science for both science and education : a workshop report. BSCS Science Learning, Colorado Springs, USA, pp 1–39 Edwards R et al (2019) Learning and developing science capital through citizen science. Citizen Sci:381–390. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv550cf2.33 Eitzel MV et al (2017) Citizen Science Terminology Matters: Exploring Key Terms. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 2(1):1. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.96 Evans C et al (2005) The neighborhood nestwatch program: participant outcomes of a citizen-science ecological research project. Conserv Biol 19(3):589–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00s01.x Eveleigh, A. et al. (2014) ‘Designing for dabblers and deterring drop-outs in citizen science’, in CHI 2014, One of a CHInd, Toronto, Canada, pp. 2985–2994 Farrié B et al (2015) Rangeland rummy - a board game to support adaptive management of rangeland-based livestock systems. J Environ Manag 147:236–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.08.018 Faure G, Blundo-Canto G, Devaux-Spatarakis A, Le Guerroué JL, Mathé S, Temple L, Toillier A, Triomphe B, Hainzelin E (2020) A participatory method to assess the contribution of agricultural research to societal changes in developing countries. Research Evaluation, 29(2):158–170 Frensley T et al (2017) Bridging the benefits of online and community supported citizen science: a case study on motivation and retention with conservation-oriented volunteers. Citizen Sci: Theory Pract 2(1):4. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.84 Frickel S et al (2010) Undone science: charting social movement and civil society challenges to research agenda setting. Science Technology and Human Values 35(4):444–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243909345836 Friis-Hansen E (2008) Impact assessment of farmer institutional development and agricultural change: Soroti district, Uganda. Dev Pract 18(4–5):506–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520802181236 Fuccillo KK et al (2015) Assessing accuracy in citizen science-based plant phenology monitoring. Int J Biometeorol 59(7):917–926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-014-0892-7 Funtowicz S et al (1997) Environmental problems, post-normal science, and extended peer communities. Études et Recherches sur les Systèmes Agraires et le Développement 30:169–175 Geoghegan H et al (2016) ‘Understanding motivations for citizen science. Final Report on behalf of the UK Environmental Observation Framework (UKEOF)’, (May), p. 124. Available at: http://www.ukeof.org.uk/resources/citizen-science-resources/MotivationsforCSREPORTFINALMay2016.pdf Green paper on Citizen Science (2013) Citizen science for Europe: towards a society of empowered citizens and enhanced research. European Commission. Brussels. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=4122 Grube J, Piliavin J (2000) Role identity, organizational experiences, and volunteer performance. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 26(9):1108–1119. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672002611007 Haklay M (2013) Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: overview and typology of participation. In: Sui D, Elwood S, Goodchild M (eds) Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: volunteered geographic information (VGI) in theory and practice. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7 Heinemann E, Van Hemelrijck A, Guijt I (2017) Getting the most out of impact evaluation for learning, reporting and influence. Insights from piloting a Participatory Impact Assessment and Learning Approach (PIALA) with IFAD. IFAD RESEARCH SERIES 16. Available at: https://www.ifad.org/documents/38714170/39317790/Res.+Series+Issue+16+Getting+the+most+out+of+impact.pdf/c76ba037-0195-420f-a290-8e8350749f0f Hellin J, Lundy M, Meijer M (2009) Farmer organization, collective action and market access in Meso-America. Food Policy 34(1):16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.10.003 Hickey S, Mohan G (2004) Participation: from tyranny to transformation. Zed Books, Exploring New Approaches to Participation in Development. First edit. London - New York Hobbs SJ, White PCL (2012) Motivations and barriers in relation to community participation in biodiversity recording. J Nat Conserv 20(6):364–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2012.08.002 Hoffmann V, Probst K, Christinck A (2007) Farmers and researchers: how can collaborative advantages be created in participatory research and technology development? Agric Hum Values 24(3):355–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-007-9072-2 Hogg E (2010) Constant, serial and trigger volunteers: volunteering across the lifecourse and into older age. Voluntary Sector Review 7(2):169–190. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/PZB01G Hughes D, and Salathé M (2015) An open access repository of images on plant health to enable the development of mobile disease diagnostics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.08060. Humphries S et al (2015) Synergies at the interface of farmer–scientist partnerships: agricultural innovation through participatory research and plant breeding in Honduras. Agriculture & Food Security 4(1):27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-015-0046-0 Irwin A (1995) Citizen science: a study of people, expertise and sustainable development. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069701800109 Jennett C et al (2016) Motivations, learning and creativity in online citizen science. J Sci Commun 15(3):1–23 Johnson NL, Lilja N, Ashby JA (2003) Measuring the impact of user participation in agricultural and natural resource management research. Agric Syst 78(2):287–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(03)00130-6 Johnson NL et al (2004) The practice of participatory research and gender analysis in natural resource management. Nat Res Forum 28(3):189–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2004.00088.x Jordan RC et al (2011) Knowledge gain and behavioral change in citizen-science programs. Conserv Biol 25(6):1148–1154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01745.x Jordan RC, Ballard HL, Phillips TB (2012) Key issues and new approaches for evaluating citizen science learning outcomes. Front Ecol Environ 10(6):307–309 Joseph MK, Andrew TN (2008) Participatory approaches for the development and use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) for rural farmers. In: 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society, pp 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS.2008.4559774 Kelling S et al (2015) Taking a “big data” approach to data quality in a citizen science project. Ambio 44(4):601–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0710-4 Kim, S. et al. (2011) ‘Creek watch: pairing usefulness and usability for successful citizen science’, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, (May 2014), pp. 2125–2134. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979251 Kiptot E, Franzel S (2014) Voluntarism as an investment in human, social and financial capital: evidence from a farmer-to-farmer extension program in Kenya. Agric Hum Values 31(2):231–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-013-9463-5 Klerkx L, Van Mierlo B, Leeuwis C (2012) Evolution of systems approaches to agricultural innovation : concepts , analysis and interventions. In: Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic, pp 457–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2 Knol P, Spruit M, Scheper W (2008) Web 2.0 revealed: business model innovation through social computing. Proceedings of the Seventh AIS SIGeBIZ Workshop on e-business (January 2008) Kristjanson P, Harvey B (2014) ‘Social learning and sustainable development’, Nature Climate, 4, pp. 5–7. Available at: http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v4/n1/full/nclimate2080.html Leonelli S (2007) Weed for thought. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Using Arabidopsis thaliana to Understand Plant Biology Lilja N, Ashby JA (1999) Types of participatory research based on locus of decision making. CGIAR Systemwide Program on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis Working Document No. 6 (6) Lilja N, Bellon MR (2008) Some common questions about participatory research: a review of the literature. Dev Pract 18(4–5):479–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520802181210 Martin G, Felten B, Duru M (2011) Forage rummy: a game to support the participatory design of adapted livestock systems. Environ Model Softw 26(12):1442–1453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.08.013 McCallie E et al. (2009) ‘Many experts, many audiences: public engagement with science and informal science education’, A CAISE Inquiry, (March), pp. 1–83. Available at: http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=eth_fac McCarthy J, Wright P (2017) Taking [a]part: the politics and aesthetics of participation in experience-centered design. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2017.1280282 McCormick S (2012) After the cap: risk assessment, citizen science and disaster recovery. Ecol Soc 17(4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05263-170431 Meynard J-M, Dedieu B, Bos B (2012) Re-design and co-design of farming systems. An overview of methods and practices. In: Darnhofer I, Gibbon D, Dedieu B (eds) Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic. Springer Science+Business Media, pp 405–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2 Middleton JV (2006) The stream doctor project: community-driven stream restoration. BioScience 51(4):293. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0293:tsdpcd]2.0.co;2 Minet J et al (2017) Crowdsourcing for agricultural applications: a review of uses and opportunities for a farmsourcing approach. Comput Electron Agric 142:126–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.08.026 Morris ML, Bellon MR (2004) Participatory plant breeding research: opportunities and challenges for the international crop improvement system. Euphytica 136(1):21–35. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EUPH.0000019509.37769.b1 Muender T et al (2019) Comparison of mouse and multi-touch for protein structure manipulation in a citizen science game interface. J Sci Commun 18(01):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 Naivinit W et al (2010) Participatory agent-based modeling and simulation of rice production and labor migrations in Northeast Thailand. Environ Model Softw 25(11):1345–1358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.01.012 Najjar D, Spaling H, Sinclair AJ (2013) Learning about sustainability and gender through farmer field schools in the Taita Hills, Kenya. Int J Educ Dev 33(5):466–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.06.004 Neef A (2008) Integrating participatory elements into conventional research projects: measuring the costs and benefits. Dev Pract 18(4–5):576–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520802181632 Neef A, Neubert D (2011) Stakeholder participation in agricultural research projects: a conceptual framework for reflection and decision-making. Agric Hum Values 28(2):179–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-010-9272-z Newman G et al (2010) User-friendly web mapping: lessons from a citizen science website. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 24(12):1851–1869. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2010.490532 Newman G et al (2017) Leveraging the power of place in citizen science for effective conservation decision making. Biol Conserv 208:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.07.019 Nov O, Arazy O, Anderson D (2014) Scientists@Home: what drives the quantity and quality of online citizen science participation? PLoS One 9(4):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090375 Ojha T, Misra S, Singh N (2015) Wireless sensor networks for agriculture : the state-of-the-art in practice and future challenges. Comput Electron Agric 118:66–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.08.011 Ottinger, G. (2010) ‘Buckets of resistance: standards and the effectiveness of citizen science’, Science, Technology & Human Values, 35(2), pp. 244–270. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243909337121 Palmer JRB et al (2017) Citizen science provides a reliable and scalable tool to track disease-carrying mosquitoes. Nat Commun 8(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00914-9 Parolini G (2015) In pursuit of a science of agriculture: the role of statistics in field experiments. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 37(3):261–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-015-0075-9 Penner LA (2002) Dispositional and organizational influences on sustained volunteerism: an Interactionist perspective. J Soc Issues 58(3):447–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00270 Phillips CB (2017) Engagement and learning in environmentally-based citizen science : a mixed methods comparative. Cornell University. Available at: https://ecommons.cornell.edu/bitstream/handle/1813/58985/Phillips_cornellgrad_0058F_10635.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y Phillips D, Waddington H, White H (2014) Better targeting of farmers as a channel for poverty reduction: a systematic review of farmer field schools targeting. Development Studies Research 1(1):113–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2014.924841 Phillips T et al (2019) Engagement in science through citizen science: moving beyond data collection. Sci Educ 103(3):665–690. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21501 Pigford AAE, Hickey GM, Klerkx L (2018) Beyond agricultural innovation systems? Exploring an agricultural innovation ecosystems approach for niche design and development in sustainability transitions. Agric Syst 164:116–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.04.007 Piliavin JA, Grube JA, Callero PL (2002) Role as resource for action in public service. J Soc Issues 58(3):469–485 Pope HAN (2013) Participatory Crop Improvement : The challenges of and opportunities for institutionalisation in the Indian public research sector. PhD thesis, University of Sussex Preece J (2016) Citizen science: new research challenges for human–computer interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 32(8):585–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2016.1194153 Pretty J (1995) Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Dev 23(8):1247–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(95)00046-F Purcell K, Garibay C, Dickinson J (2012) A gateway to science for all: celebrate urban birds. In: Citizen Science: Public Participation in Environmental Research. Cornell Paperbacks Raddick MJ et al (2013) Galaxy zoo: motivations of citizen scientists. Astron Educ Rev 12(1):1–41. https://doi.org/10.3847/AER2011021 Reed J et al (2013) An exploratory factor analysis of motivations for participating in Zooniverse, a collection of virtual citizen science projects. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences:610–619. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2013.85 Richards P (2007) How does participation work? Deliberation and performance in African food security. IDS Bull 38(5):21–35 Riesch H, Potter C (2014) Citizen science as seen by scientists: methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions. Public Underst Sci 23(1):107–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513497324 Robinson LD et al (2018) Ten principles of citizen science. In: Hecker S, Haklay M, Bowser A, Makuch Z, Vogel J, A. B (eds) Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy. UCL Press, London, pp 1–23 Rotman D, et al (2012) ‘Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects’, Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW ‘12, p. 217. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145238 Ryan SF et al (2018) ‘The role of citizen science in addressing grand challenges in food and agriculture research. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 285:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.1977 Schäfer T, Kieslinger B (2016) Supporting emerging forms of citizen science: A plea for diversity, creativity and social innovation. J Sci Commun 15(2):1–12. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.15020402 Schot J, Geels FW (2008) Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys : theory , findings , research agenda , and policy. Tech Anal Strat Manag 20:37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320802292651 Schut M et al (2016) Innovation platforms: experiences with their institutional embedding in agricultural research for development. Exp Agric 52(04):537–561. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001447971500023X Scoones I, Thompson J, Chambers R (2008) Farmer first revisited. In: Scoones I, Thompson J, Chambers R (eds) Farmer First Revisited: Innovation for Agricultural Research and Development, pp 1–22 Available at: http://www.future-agricultures.org/farmerfirst/files/Farmer_First_Revisited_Post_Workshop_Summary_Final.pdf Sharma N et al (2019) From citizen science to citizen action: Analysing the potential for a digital platform to cultivate attachments to nature. J Sci Commun 18(1). https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18010207 Shirk J et al (2012) Public participation in scientific research: a framework for intentional design. Ecol Soc 17(2):29. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04705-170229 Skarlatidou A, Ponti M et al (2019a) User experience of digital technologies in citizen science. J Sci Commun:1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 Skarlatidou A, Hamilton A et al (2019b) What do volunteers want from citizen science technologies? A systematic literature review and best practice guidelines. J Sci Commun 18(1):1–23. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18010202 Solli PE, Wilson Rowe E, Yennie Lindgren W (2013) Coming into the cold: Asia’s Arctic interests. Polar Geogr 36(4):253–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2013.825345 Spielman DJ, Kennedy A (2016) Towards better metrics and policymaking for seed system development: insights from Asia’s seed industry. Agric Syst 147:111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.05.015 Spiers H et al (2019) Everyone counts? Design considerations in online citizen science. J Sci Commun 18(1):1–32. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18010204 Sturm U, Tscholl M (2019) The role of digital user feedback in a user-centred development process in citizen science. J Sci Commun 18(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18010203 Sullivan BL et al (2014) The eBird enterprise: an integrated approach to development and application of citizen science. Biol Conserv 169:31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.003 Sumberg J, Okali C (1997) Farmers’ experiments: creating local knowledge. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, Colorado, USA Sumberg J, Okali C, Reece D (2003) Agricultural research in the face of diversity, local knowledge and the participation imperative: theoretical considerations. Agric Syst 76(2):739–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00153-1 Sumberg J et al (2013) From agricultural research to “product development”: what role for user feedback and feedback loops? Outlook on Agriculture 42(4):233–242. https://doi.org/10.5367/oa.2013.0144 Ton G et al (2014) Empowering smallholder farmers in markets: strengthening the advocacy capacities of national farmer organisations through collaborative research. Food Security 6(2):261–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-014-0339-3 Trimble M, de Araujo LG, Seixas CS (2014) One party does not tango! Fishers’ non-participation as a barrier to co-management in Paraty, Brazil. Ocean Coast Manag 92:9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.02.004 Trumbull DJ et al (2000) Thinking scientifically during participation in a citizen-science project. Sci Educ 84(2):265–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2<265::AID-SCE7>3.0.CO;2-5 Unell J, Castle R (2012) ‘Developing sustainable volunteering within the natural connections demonstration project: a review of evidence’, Natural England Commissioned Report NECR096, (July), p. 36. Available at: http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/1988713 van de Fliert E, Braun AR (2002) Conceptualizing integrative , farmer participatory research for sustainable agriculture : From opportunities to impact. Agric Hum Values 19:25–38. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015081030682 van Etten J et al (2019) Crop variety management for climate adaptation supported by citizen science. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116(10). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1813720116 van Ingen E, Wilson J (2017) I volunteer, therefore I am? Factors affecting volunteer role identity. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q 46(1):29–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764016659765 Van Mele P (2006) Zooming-in zooming-out: a novel method to scale up local innovations and sustainable technologies. Int J Agric Sustain 4(2):131–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2006.9684796 Vines J et al. (2012) ‘Participation and HCI: Why Involve People in Design?’, Proc. of the 2012 ACM annual conference extended abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts - CHI EA ‘12, (May), pp. 1217–1220. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2212427 Vines J, Clarke R, Wright P (2013) Configuring participation: on how we involve people in design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 20(1):429–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00026-X Waddington H et al (2014) Farmer field schools for improving farming practices and farmer. A Systematic Review, Campbell Systematic Reviews, Outcomes. https://doi.org/10.4073/CSR.2014.6 Waters-Bayer A et al (2007) PROLINNOVA: building partnerships to promote local innovation processes. Farmer Participatory Research and Development Twenty Years on, Farmer First Revisited, pp 12–14 Available at: http://www.future-agricultures.org/farmerfirst/files/T3b_WatersBayer.pdf Waters-Bayer A et al (2015) Exploring the impact of farmer-led research supported by civil society organisations. Agriculture & Food Security 4:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-015-0023-7 West S, Pateman R (2016) Recruiting and retaining Participants in citizen science: what can be learned from the volunteering literature? Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 1(2):1–10. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.8 White, S. C. (1996) ‘Depoliticising development: the uses and abuses of participation’, Dev Pract, 6(1), pp. 6–15. Wiggins A, Crowston K (2011) ‘From conservation to crowd sourcing: a typology of citizen science’, 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–10 Woolley JP et al (2016) Citizen science or scientific citizenship? Disentangling the uses of public engagement rhetoric in national research initiatives. BMC Medical Ethics 17(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0117-1