Citing and referencing habits in medicine and social sciences journals in 2019
Tóm tắt
This article explores citing and referencing systems in social sciences and medicine articles from different theoretical and practical perspectives, considering bibliographic references as a facet of descriptive representation.
The analysis of citing and referencing elements (i.e. bibliographic references, mentions, quotations and respective in-text reference pointers) identified citing and referencing habits within disciplines under consideration and errors occurring over the long term as stated by previous studies now expanded. Future expected trends of information retrieval from bibliographic metadata was gathered by approaching these referencing elements from the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) entities concepts.
Reference styles do not fully accomplish with their role of guiding authors and publishers on providing concise and well-structured bibliographic metadata within bibliographic references. Trends on representative description revision suggest a predicted distancing on the ways information is approached by bibliographic references and bibliographic catalogs adopting FRBR concepts, including the description levels adopted by each of them under the perspective of the FRBR entities concept.
This study was based on a subset of medicine and social sciences articles published in 2019 and, therefore, it may not be taken as a final and broad coverage. Future studies expanding these approaches to other disciplines and chronological periods are encouraged.
By approaching citing and referencing issues as descriptive representation's facets, findings on this study may encourage further studies that will support information science and computer science on providing tools to become bibliographic metadata description simpler, better structured and more efficient facing the revision of descriptive representation actually in progress.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
ABNT, 2018, ABNT NBR 6023 - informação e documentação - referências: elaboração
2007, O impacto dos metadados na representação descritiva, Revista ACB: Biblioteconomia em Santa Catarina, 12, 177
Barbeau, E. (2018), “Why thousands of citation styles exist”, available at: https://www.citethisforme.com/blog/2018/08/17/thousands-citation-styles-exist (accessed 17 August 2020).
BibMe (2017), “Why are there so many citation styles?”, available at: https://www.bibme.org/blog/updates/many-citation-styles/ (accessed 17 August 2020).
1987, Power and centrality: a family of measures, American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1170, 10.1086/228631
1982, Norms and functions in citation - the view of journal editors and referees in psychology, Social Science Information Studies, 2, 65, 10.1016/0143-6236(82)90001-1
2008, Dicionário de Biblioteconomia e Arquivologia
1998, Construção de conceitos no campo da ciência da informação, Ciência da Informação, 27, 46, 10.1590/S0100-19651998000100006
Gratz, A. (2016), “Why are there so many different citation styles?”, available at: https://libraries.mercer.edu/research-tools-help/citation-tools-help/DifferentCitationStylesHandout.pdf (accessed 17 August 2020).
2012, A further step forward in measuring journals' scientific prestige: the SJR2 indicator, Journal of Informetrics, 6, 674, 10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.001
1893, Rules for Compositors and Readers at the University Press
ICMJE (2020), “Preparing a manuscript for submission to a medical journal”, available at: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/manuscript-preparation/preparing-for-submission.html#g (accessed 17 August 2020).
IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (2009), “Functional Requirements for bibliographic records”, available at: https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf (accessed 17 August 2020).
IFLA (2009), “Statement of international cataloguing principles”, available at: https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/icp/icp_2009-en.pdf (accessed 17 August 2020).
ISO, 2010, ISO 690 - Information and Documentation - Guidelines for BRs and Citations to Information Resources
2015, Introduction to Cataloging and Classification, 11th ed.
2004, Indexação e resumos, 2nd ed.
2011, Reflexões acerca das relações entre representação temática e descritiva, Informação and Sociedade: Estudos, 21, 27
OCLC (2020), “OCLC research activities and IFLA's functional Requirements for bibliographic records”, available at: https://www.oclc.org/research/activities/frbr.html (accessed 17 August 2020).
1977, Style manuals and guides for authors and editors: prescriptive or descriptive?, 287
2018, The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles, PeerJ, 6, e4375, 10.7717/peerj.4375
2020, Glossary of the article ‘Citing and referencing habits in Medicine and Social Sciences journals in 2019’, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3996578
2020, Raw and aggregated data for the study introduced in the article ‘Citing and referencing habits in Medicine and Social Sciences journals in 2019’, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3996582
2020, Workflow for retrieving all the data of the analysis introduced in the article ‘Citing and referencing habits in Medicine and Social Sciences journals in 2019’, 10.17504/protocols.io.bbifikbn
SCImago (2020), “SJR - SCImago journal and country Rank”, available at: http://www.scimagojr.com (accessed 17 August 2020).
1989, Errors in bibliographic citations: a continuing problem, The Library Quarterly, 59, 291, 10.1086/602160
2003, The FRBR model (functional Requirements for bibliographic records)
2003, What Is FRBR? a Conceptual Model for the Bibliographic Universe
UCM Writing Center (2016), “Why are there so many citation styles?”, available at: http://ucmwriting.weebly.com/blog/why-are-there-so-many-citation-styles# (accessed 17 August 2020).